A new method of measuring stock market manipulation through structural equation modeling (SEM)

This paper proposes a new model of measuring a latent variable, stock market manipulation. The model bears close resemblance with the literature on economic well-being. It interprets the manipulation of a stock as a latent variable, in the form of a multiple indicators and multiple causes (MIMIC) model. This approach exploits systematic relations between various indicators of manipulation and between manipulation and multiple causes, which allows it to identify the determinants of manipulation and an index of manipulation simultaneously. The main reason of stock market manipulation comes from the fact that information availability is not universally equal. The manipulation is thus critically linked to the creation, arrival and dissemination of information or rumors/mis-information. Thus, the immediate impact of manipulation is on the time profile of returns, or excess returns, from an asset and the excess volatility of returns in excess of the volatility explained by the fundamentals. In this basic setup, the model used these two variables as the indicators of stock market manipulation. The main intuition of the MIMIC approach is that some variables, or statistics, related to peace are indicators of manipulation, while others signify effects or outputs of causal factors, or inputs, of manipulation. In other words, distinction can be made between causes of manipulation and indicators of manipulation. The causal factors used in this model are classified into five different domains namely pure economic factors as determinants of manipulation, labor market conditions, international factors, quality of governance factors and systematic risk factors.

[1]  Kose John,et al.  Market Manipulation and the Role of Insider Trading Regulations , 1997 .

[2]  Astrid Oline Ervik IQ and the Wealth of Nations. , 2003 .

[3]  Avinash Dixit,et al.  Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance , 2011 .

[4]  E. Armson False trading and market rigging in Australia , 2009 .

[5]  I. Mangla,et al.  Market Volatility, Manipulation, and Regulatory Response: A Comparative Study of Bombay and , 2006 .

[6]  M. D. Morris,et al.  Measuring the Condition of the World's Poor: The Physical Quality of Life Index , 1979 .

[7]  R. Jarrow,et al.  Market manipulation and corporate finance: A new perspective , 1993 .

[8]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[9]  IQ and the Wealth of Nations , 2004, Heredity.

[10]  Jean-Luc Vila Simple games of market manipulation , 1989 .

[11]  K. Jöreskog A General Method for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System. , 1970 .

[12]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Estimation of a Model with Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes of a Single Latent Variable , 1975 .

[13]  Franklin Allen,et al.  Stock-Price Manipulation , 1992 .

[14]  Richard Lynn,et al.  IQ and Global Inequality , 2006 .

[15]  Robert A. Jarrow,et al.  Market Manipulation, Bubbles, Corners, and Short Squeezes , 1992, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[16]  B. Muthén BEYOND SEM: GENERAL LATENT VARIABLE MODELING , 2002 .

[17]  Dionigi Gerace,et al.  Stock Market Manipulation on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange , 2014 .

[18]  J. Cyriax,et al.  Manipulation , 2018, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[19]  Stan Lipovetsky,et al.  Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis , 2001, Technometrics.

[20]  Sophia Rabe-Hesketh,et al.  Generalized latent variable models: multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models , 2004 .

[21]  Md. Abdul Hannan Mia,et al.  Origin of & Solution to Global Financial Meltdown: An Islamic View , 2012 .

[22]  C. Davies IQ AND THE WEALTH OF NATIONS , 2003 .

[23]  Roberto Dell'Anno,et al.  Estimating the Shadow Economy in Italy: A Structural Equation Approach , 2003 .