Denmark at a Crossroad? Intensified Data Sourcing in a Research Radical Country

Denmark is regularly portrayed in international science journals as ‘the epidemiologist’s dream’: a country where health data on all citizens can be combined with e.g. information about social or financial position, kinship ties, school performance data as well as tissue samples. Moreover, it can all be done without the informed consent of the individual. This chapter describes the practices in Denmark involved in what I call ‘intensified data sourcing’. I define intensified data sourcing as attempts at getting more data, of better quality, on more people – and I point out how intensified data sourcing has emerged as a new way of running the health services. My key point with this chapter is that though research uses of health data receive the most attention, research is not necessarily the main purpose with intensified data sourcing. Nevertheless, ethical debates tend to focus on research and thereby neglect an adequate understanding of the everyday practices of data sourcing and the many competing purposes it serves. Furthermore, I point out how ethical debates often focus on the rights of the individual, though data sourcing operates at the level of the population, and when attending to individual rights there is an unfortunate tendency to conjure concerns about privacy with rights of autonomy. We need new modes of ethical reasoning that take point of departure in an understanding of actual data practices. Since Denmark is in many ways at the forefront of intensified data sourcing, it is a good place from which to begin rethinking the policy challenges associated with intensified data sourcing at both national and European levels.

[1]  Vilhjalmur Arnason,et al.  Coding and Consent: Moral Challenges of the Database Project in Iceland , 2004, Bioethics.

[2]  Erwin Laure,et al.  Privacy Threat Modeling for Emerging BiobankClouds , 2014, EUSPN/ICTH.

[3]  L. Hogle,et al.  Informed Consent: The Politics of Intent and Practice in Medical Research Ethics* , 2014 .

[4]  C. Holmberg,et al.  Making Predictions , 2013 .

[5]  S. Bauer From Administrative Infrastructure to Biomedical Resource: Danish Population Registries, the “Scandinavian Laboratory,” and the “Epidemiologist's Dream” , 2014, Science in Context.

[6]  Iain E. Buchan,et al.  A unified modeling approach to data-intensive healthcare , 2009, The Fourth Paradigm.

[7]  M Gwinn,et al.  Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics. , 2001, JAMA.

[8]  Regeringen och Regeringskansliet Ett lyft för forskning och innovation , 2008 .

[9]  L. Hood,et al.  A personal view on systems medicine and the emergence of proactive P4 medicine: predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory. , 2012, New biotechnology.

[10]  Michael Morrison,et al.  Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks , 2014, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[11]  Shirly Bar-Lev The politics of healthcare informatics: knowledge management using an electronic medical record system. , 2015, Sociology of health & illness.

[12]  L. Frank The Epidemiologist's Dream: Denmark , 2003, Science.

[13]  M. Mayrhofer About the new significance and the contingent meaning of biological material and data in biobanks. , 2013, History and philosophy of the life sciences.

[14]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts , 2015, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[15]  Thorvald Sirnes,et al.  Population Biobanks: The Ethical Gravity of Informed Consent , 2006 .

[16]  Ants Nõmper Open consent - a new form of informed consent for population genetic databases , 2005 .

[17]  I. Kerridge,et al.  Consent in crisis: the need to reconceptualize consent to tissue banking research , 2006, Internal medicine journal.

[18]  Lau Caspar Thygesen,et al.  When the entire population is the sample: strengths and limitations in register-based epidemiology , 2014, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[19]  C. Novas The Political Economy of Hope: Patients’ Organizations, Science and Biovalue , 2006 .

[20]  A. Mol The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[21]  K. Maschke,et al.  Alternative consent approaches for biobank research. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[22]  I. Hacking The looping effects of human kinds , 1995 .

[23]  T. Murdoch,et al.  The inevitable application of big data to health care. , 2013, JAMA.

[24]  Viktor Mayer-Schnberger,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2013 .

[25]  T. Beauchamp,et al.  A History and Theory of Informed Consent , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[26]  Joakim Dillner,et al.  Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[27]  L Frank,et al.  When an Entire Country Is a Cohort , 2000, Science.

[28]  Nikolas Rose,et al.  The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century , 2006 .

[29]  Sabina Leonelli,et al.  What difference does quantity make? On the epistemology of Big Data in biology , 2014, Big Data Soc..

[30]  Klaus Hoeyer,et al.  Informed Consent: The Making of a Ubiquitous Rule in Medical Practice , 2009 .

[31]  Peter C. Smith Reflecting on ‘Analytical perspectives on performance-based management: an outline of theoretical assumptions in the existing literature’ , 2015, Health Economics, Policy and Law.

[32]  David Armstrong,et al.  Actors, patients and agency: a recent history. , 2014, Sociology of health & illness.

[33]  David Wendler,et al.  One-time general consent for research on biological samples , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[34]  A. Tupasela Re-examining medical modernization: framing the public in Finnish biomedical research policy , 2007, Public understanding of science.

[35]  O. Corrigan,et al.  Empty ethics: the problem with informed consent. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[36]  K. Steinsbekk,et al.  Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: Is passive participation an ethical problem? , 2013, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[37]  J. Kaye The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research. , 2012, Annual review of genomics and human genetics (Print).

[38]  R. Madden Being Ethnographic: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Ethnography , 2010 .

[39]  Leroy Hood,et al.  Integrating big data and actionable health coaching to optimize wellness , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[40]  C. Lidz,et al.  Chronic disease: The sick role and informed consent , 1985, Culture, medicine and psychiatry.

[41]  R. Price,et al.  Artemether-lumefantrine treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis of day 7 lumefantrine concentrations and therapeutic response using individual patient data , 2015, BMC Medicine.