Improved volumetric measurement of brain structure with a distortion correction procedure using an ADNI phantom.

PURPOSE Serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images acquired from multisite and multivendor MRI scanners are widely used in measuring longitudinal structural changes in the brain. Precise and accurate measurements are important in understanding the natural progression of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease. However, geometric distortions in MRI images decrease the accuracy and precision of volumetric or morphometric measurements. To solve this problem, the authors suggest a commercially available phantom-based distortion correction method that accommodates the variation in geometric distortion within MRI images obtained with multivendor MRI scanners. METHODS The authors' method is based on image warping using a polynomial function. The method detects fiducial points within a phantom image using phantom analysis software developed by the Mayo Clinic and calculates warping functions for distortion correction. To quantify the effectiveness of the authors' method, the authors corrected phantom images obtained from multivendor MRI scanners and calculated the root-mean-square (RMS) of fiducial errors and the circularity ratio as evaluation values. The authors also compared the performance of the authors' method with that of a distortion correction method based on a spherical harmonics description of the generic gradient design parameters. Moreover, the authors evaluated whether this correction improves the test-retest reproducibility of voxel-based morphometry in human studies. RESULTS A Wilcoxon signed-rank test with uncorrected and corrected images was performed. The root-mean-square errors and circularity ratios for all slices significantly improved (p < 0.0001) after the authors' distortion correction. Additionally, the authors' method was significantly better than a distortion correction method based on a description of spherical harmonics in improving the distortion of root-mean-square errors (p < 0.001 and 0.0337, respectively). Moreover, the authors' method reduced the RMS error arising from gradient nonlinearity more than gradwarp methods. In human studies, the coefficient of variation of voxel-based morphometry analysis of the whole brain improved significantly from 3.46% to 2.70% after distortion correction of the whole gray matter using the authors' method (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The authors proposed a phantom-based distortion correction method to improve reproducibility in longitudinal structural brain analysis using multivendor MRI. The authors evaluated the authors' method for phantom images in terms of two geometrical values and for human images in terms of test-retest reproducibility. The results showed that distortion was corrected significantly using the authors' method. In human studies, the reproducibility of voxel-based morphometry analysis for the whole gray matter significantly improved after distortion correction using the authors' method.

[1]  M. Revenu,et al.  MRI geometric distortion: A simple approach to correcting the effects of non‐linear gradient fields , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Nick C Fox,et al.  The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  H. Benali,et al.  Support vector machine-based classification of Alzheimer’s disease from whole-brain anatomical MRI , 2009, Neuroradiology.

[4]  Huawei Zhao,et al.  Use of spherical harmonic deconvolution methods to compensate for nonlinear gradient effects on MRI images , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  V Sturm,et al.  Correction of spatial distortion in MR imaging: a prerequisite for accurate stereotaxy. , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer's disease. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  A. W. Toga,et al.  3D maps localize caudate nucleus atrophy in 400 Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy elderly subjects , 2010, Neurobiology of Aging.

[8]  Marie Chupin,et al.  Automatic classi fi cation of patients with Alzheimer ' s disease from structural MRI : A comparison of ten methods using the ADNI database , 2010 .

[9]  A. Liddle,et al.  Information criteria for astrophysical model selection , 2007, astro-ph/0701113.

[10]  A. Dale,et al.  Subregional neuroanatomical change as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Gradient distortions in MRI: Characterizing and correcting for their effects on SIENA-generated measures of brain volume change , 2010, NeuroImage.

[12]  Norbert Schuff,et al.  Measurement of MRI scanner performance with the ADNI phantom. , 2009, Medical physics.

[13]  P. Scheltens,et al.  Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: revising the NINCDS–ADRDA criteria , 2007, The Lancet Neurology.

[14]  Michael Weiner,et al.  Comparison of phantom and registration scaling corrections using the ADNI cohort , 2009, NeuroImage.

[15]  A. Dale,et al.  Structural MRI biomarkers for preclinical and mild Alzheimer's disease , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[16]  C. Jack,et al.  Brain MRI hippocampal volume and prediction of clinical status in a mild cognitive impairment trial , 2002, Journal of Molecular Neuroscience.

[17]  Didier Dormont,et al.  Characterization and correction of distortions in stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging for bilateral subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[18]  H Matsuda,et al.  Automatic Voxel-Based Morphometry of Structural MRI by SPM8 plus Diffeomorphic Anatomic Registration Through Exponentiated Lie Algebra Improves the Diagnosis of Probable Alzheimer Disease , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[19]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: Effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[20]  Norbert Schuff,et al.  Longitudinal stability of MRI for mapping brain change using tensor-based morphometry , 2006, NeuroImage.

[21]  D. Bennett,et al.  MRI-derived entorhinal and hippocampal atrophy in incipient and very mild Alzheimer’s disease☆ ☆ This research was supported by grants P01 AG09466 and P30 AG10161 from the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health. , 2001, Neurobiology of Aging.

[22]  C. Jack,et al.  Medial temporal atrophy on MRI in normal aging and very mild Alzheimer's disease , 1997, Neurology.

[23]  Takeshi Iwatsubo,et al.  Japanese Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Present status and future , 2010, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[24]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[25]  M A Moerland,et al.  Analysis of machine-dependent and object-induced geometric distortion in 2DFT MR imaging. , 1992, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  Clifford R. Jack,et al.  Alzheimer's disease diagnosis in individual subjects using structural MR images: Validation studies , 2008, NeuroImage.

[27]  B Gino Fallone,et al.  Characterization, prediction, and correction of geometric distortion in 3 T MR images. , 2007, Medical physics.