Stimulus Relations in Comparative Primate Perspective

Nonhuman primates have demonstrated the ability to learn a variety of stimulus-stimulus relations. Lexigram-word linguistic systems with juvenile pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) have disclosed incidental learning of relations between lexigrams, objects, and spoken English. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) have shown equivalence relations in which “food” and “tool” lexigrams were used to categorize other lexigrams. The latter subjects also showed evidence of generalized learning strategies such as “learning by exclusion.” The discussion of these findings focuses on developmental and species factors that seem critical to their development.

[1]  D M Baer,et al.  The development of imitation by reinforcing behavioral similarity to a model. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  M Sidman,et al.  A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  D M Rumbaugh,et al.  The capacity of animals to acquire language: do species differences have anything to say to us? , 1985, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  S. Savage-Rumbaugh,et al.  Spontaneous symbol acquisition and communicative use by pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus). , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  S. Revusky,et al.  Learned Associations Over Long Delays1 , 1970 .

[6]  G. Green,et al.  Development of conditional and equivalence relations without differential consequences. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  E. S. Savage-rumbaugh,et al.  Ape Language: From Conditioned Response to Symbol , 1986 .

[8]  M R D'Amato,et al.  Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  Duane M. Rumbaugh,et al.  Symbols: Their communicative use, comprehension, and combination by bonobos (Pan paniscus). , 1990 .

[10]  H. Harlow,et al.  The formation of learning sets. , 1949, Psychological review.

[11]  K. C. Kirby,et al.  The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. , 1988, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  M Sidman,et al.  Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. , 1989, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  D. Rumbaugh,et al.  Reference: the linguistic essential. , 1980, Science.

[14]  J. J. McDowell,et al.  Matching Theory in Natural Human Environments , 1988, The Behavior analyst.

[15]  W J McIlvane,et al.  Acquisition of matching - to - sample performances in severe retardation: learning by exclusion. , 1981, Journal of mental deficiency research.

[16]  K. Reeve,et al.  Stimulus generalization and equivalence classes: a model for natural categories. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  K. Breland,et al.  The misbehavior of organisms. , 1961 .

[18]  M. Sidman,et al.  Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  S. Savage-Rumbaugh,et al.  Symbolic cross-modal transfer in two species of chimpanzees. , 1988, Child development.