Construction of Drug Network Based on Side Effects and Its Application for Drug Repositioning

Drugs with similar side-effect profiles may share similar therapeutic properties through related mechanisms of action. In this study, a drug-drug network was constructed based on the similarities between their clinical side effects. The indications of a drug may be inferred by the enriched FDA-approved functions of its neighbouring drugs in the network. We systematically screened new indications for 1234 drugs with more than 2 network neighbours, 36.87% of the drugs achieved a performance score of Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain in the top 5 positions (NDCG@5)≥0.7, which means most of the known FDA-approved indications were well predicted at the top 5 positions. In particular, drugs for diabetes, obesity, laxatives and antimycobacterials had extremely high performance with more than 80% of them achieving NDCG@5≥0.7. Additionally, by manually checking the predicted 1858 drug-indication pairs with Expression Analysis Systematic Explorer (EASE) score≤10−5 (EASE score is a rigorously modified Fisher exact test p value), we found that 80.73% of such pairs could be verified by preclinical/clinical studies or scientific literature. Furthermore, our method could be extended to predict drugs not covered in the network. We took 98 external drugs not covered in the network as the test sample set. Based on our similarity criteria using side effects, we identified 41 drugs with significant similarities to other drugs in the network. Among them, 36.59% of the drugs achieved NDCG@5≥0.7. In all of the 106 drug-indication pairs with an EASE score≤0.05, 50.94% of them are supported by FDA approval or preclinical/clinical studies. In summary, our method which is based on the indications enriched by network neighbors may provide new clues for drug repositioning using side effects.

[1]  D. Robinson,et al.  Prostaglandin-stimulated bone resorption by rheumatoid synovia. A possible mechanism for bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1975, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[2]  B. Driessen,et al.  Interaction of the central analgesic, tramadol, with the uptake and release of 5‐hydroxytryptamine in the rat brain in vitro , 1992, British journal of pharmacology.

[3]  R. Shank,et al.  Opioid and nonopioid components independently contribute to the mechanism of action of tramadol, an 'atypical' opioid analgesic. , 1992, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[4]  G. M. Bressa,et al.  S‐adenosyl‐l‐methionine (SAMe) as antidepressant: meta‐analysis of clinical studies , 1994, Acta neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[5]  M. Prada,et al.  Improved Therapy of Parkinson's Disease with Tolcapone, a Central and Peripheral COMT Inhibitor with an S‐Adenosyl‐L‐Methionine‐Sparing Effect , 1994 .

[6]  Tolcapone: a potential new antidepressant detected in a novel animal model of depression , 1994, Behavioural pharmacology.

[7]  P. Dayer,et al.  Contribution of monoaminergic modulation to the analgesic effect of tramadol. , 1996, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[8]  J. Micó,et al.  Tramadol induces antidepressant-type effects in mice. , 1998, Life sciences.

[9]  M. Fava,et al.  Open study of the catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor tolcapone in major depressive disorder. , 1999, Journal of clinical psychopharmacology.

[10]  J. Sundy COX-2 inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis , 2001, Current rheumatology reports.

[11]  C. Bingham Development and clinical application of COX-2-selective inhibitors for the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. , 2002, Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine.

[12]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques , 2002, TOIS.

[13]  Douglas A. Hosack,et al.  Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE , 2003, Genome Biology.

[14]  T. Ashburn,et al.  Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[15]  I. Kola,et al.  Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[16]  N. Borges Tolcapone in Parkinson’s disease: liver toxicity and clinical efficacy , 2005, Expert opinion on drug safety.

[17]  R Kohnen,et al.  The catechol-O-methyltransferase Val108/158Met polymorphism affects short-term treatment response to mirtazapine, but not to paroxetine in major depression , 2005, The Pharmacogenomics Journal.

[18]  Paul A Clemons,et al.  The Connectivity Map: Using Gene-Expression Signatures to Connect Small Molecules, Genes, and Disease , 2006, Science.

[19]  L. Fañanás,et al.  Analysis of COMT gene (Val 158 Met polymorphism) in the clinical response to SSRIs in depressive patients of European origin. , 2006, Journal of affective disorders.

[20]  J. Aronson,et al.  Meyler's side effects of drugs : the international encyclopedia of adverse drug reactions and interactions , 2006 .

[21]  G. V. Paolini,et al.  Global mapping of pharmacological space , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  Brad T. Sherman,et al.  Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[23]  E. Smeraldi,et al.  The catechol-O-methyltransferase Val(108/158)Met polymorphism affects antidepressant response to paroxetine in a naturalistic setting , 2009, Psychopharmacology.

[24]  V. Tayal,et al.  Evaluation of antidepressant activity of tramadol in mice , 2008, Indian journal of pharmacology.

[25]  N. Ozaki,et al.  Influence of the tyrosine hydroxylase val81met polymorphism and catechol‐O‐methyltransferase val158met polymorphism on the antidepressant effect of milnacipran , 2008, Human psychopharmacology.

[26]  J. Micó,et al.  Opiates as antidepressants. , 2009, Current pharmaceutical design.

[27]  Eric David,et al.  Pharmaceutical R&D: the road to positive returns , 2009, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[28]  D. Truong Tolcapone: review of its pharmacology and use as adjunctive therapy in patients with Parkinson’s disease , 2009, Clinical interventions in aging.

[29]  Charles C. Persinger,et al.  How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[30]  R. Tagliaferri,et al.  Discovery of drug mode of action and drug repositioning from transcriptional responses , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  P. Bork,et al.  A side effect resource to capture phenotypic effects of drugs , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[32]  E. Smeraldi,et al.  Effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase Val(108/158)Met polymorphism on antidepressant efficacy of fluvoxamine , 2010, European Psychiatry.

[33]  Pankaj Agarwal,et al.  Systematic Drug Repositioning Based on Clinical Side-Effects , 2011, PloS one.

[34]  Y. Forsell,et al.  The functional Val158Met polymorphism in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) is associated with depression and motivation in men from a Swedish population-based study. , 2011, Journal of affective disorders.

[35]  Lin He,et al.  DRAR-CPI: a server for identifying drug repositioning potential and adverse drug reactions via the chemical–protein interactome , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[36]  R. Sharan,et al.  PREDICT: a method for inferring novel drug indications with application to personalized medicine , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[37]  E. Gordon,et al.  An investigation of EEG, genetic and cognitive markers of treatment response to antidepressant medication in patients with major depressive disorder: a pilot study. , 2011, Journal of affective disorders.

[38]  P. Gokul,et al.  Evaluation of role of noradrenergic system in the antidepressant activity of tramadol using tail suspension test in Albino mice , 2011, Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics.

[39]  F. Pammolli,et al.  The productivity crisis in pharmaceutical R&D , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[40]  Oakland J. Peters,et al.  Predicting new indications for approved drugs using a proteochemometric method. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[41]  Patrick Aloy,et al.  Recycling side-effects into clinical markers for drug repositioning , 2012, Genome Medicine.

[42]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  Drug Repurposing: Far Beyond New Targets for Old Drugs , 2012, The AAPS Journal.

[43]  L. Cardon,et al.  Use of genome-wide association studies for drug repositioning , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  Yadi Zhou,et al.  Prediction of chemical-protein interactions: multitarget-QSAR versus computational chemogenomic methods. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.

[45]  K. Śmietana,et al.  Outlook for the next 5 years in drug innovation , 2012, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[46]  Zhiwei Cao,et al.  A pathway profile-based method for drug repositioning , 2012 .

[47]  Kailin Tang,et al.  Study of drug function based on similarity of pathway fingerprint , 2012, Protein & Cell.

[48]  Y Z Chen,et al.  Predicting targeted polypharmacology for drug repositioning and multi- target drug discovery. , 2013, Current medicinal chemistry.

[49]  Luonan Chen,et al.  Network-based drug repositioning. , 2013, Molecular bioSystems.

[50]  Collectif Side Effects of Drugs Annual : A worldwide yearly survey of new data in adverse drug reactions , 2015 .

[51]  Chetna K. Desai Meyler's side effects of drugs: The international encyclopedia of adverse drug reactions and interactions , 2016, Indian Journal of Pharmacology.