Gait event detection in laboratory and real life settings: Accuracy of ankle and waist sensor based methods.

Wearable sensors technology based on inertial measurement units (IMUs) is leading the transition from laboratory-based gait analysis, to daily life gait monitoring. However, the validity of IMU-based methods for the detection of gait events has only been tested in laboratory settings, which may not reproduce real life walking patterns. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of two algorithms for the detection of gait events and temporal parameters during free-living walking, one based on two shank-worn inertial sensors, and the other based on one waist-worn sensor. The algorithms were applied to gait data of ten healthy subjects walking both indoor and outdoor, and completing protocols that entailed both straight supervised and free walking in an urban environment. The values obtained from the inertial sensors were compared to pressure insoles data. The shank-based method showed very accurate initial contact, stride time and step time estimation (<14ms error). Accuracy of final contact timings and stance time was lower (28-51ms error range). The error of temporal parameter variability estimates was in the range 0.09-0.89%. The waist method failed to detect about 1% of the total steps and performed worse than the shank method, but the temporal parameter estimation was still satisfactory. Both methods showed negligible differences in their accuracy when the different experimental conditions were compared, which suggests their applicability in the analysis of free-living gait.

[1]  Stephen R Lord,et al.  Comparison of handheld video camera and GAITRite® measurement of gait impairment in people with early stage Parkinson's disease: a pilot study. , 2013, Journal of Parkinson's disease.

[2]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Wearable pendant device monitoring using new wavelet-based methods shows daily life and laboratory gaits are different , 2015, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[3]  Catherine Dehollain,et al.  Gait assessment in Parkinson's disease: toward an ambulatory system for long-term monitoring , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Estimation of step-by-step spatio-temporal parameters of normal and impaired gait using shank-mounted magneto-inertial sensors: application to elderly, hemiparetic, parkinsonian and choreic gait , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[5]  Keith D Hill,et al.  Gait variability in younger and older adult women is altered by overground walking protocol. , 2009, Age and ageing.

[6]  Marco Donati,et al.  An enhanced estimate of initial contact and final contact instants of time using lower trunk inertial sensor data. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[7]  A. Hof,et al.  Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters from trunk accelerations during human walking. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[8]  Diana Trojaniello,et al.  Accuracy, sensitivity and robustness of five different methods for the estimation of gait temporal parameters using a single inertial sensor mounted on the lower trunk. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[9]  Hylton B Menz,et al.  Accelerometry: a technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[10]  C. Mazzà,et al.  Step Detection and Activity Recognition Accuracy of Seven Physical Activity Monitors , 2015, PloS one.

[11]  Wiebren Zijlstra,et al.  Does walking strategy in older people change as a function of walking distance? , 2009, Gait & posture.

[12]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff Gait dynamics, fractals and falls: finding meaning in the stride-to-stride fluctuations of human walking. , 2007, Human movement science.

[13]  Shane A Lowe,et al.  Monitoring human health behaviour in one's living environment: a technological review. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  Alan Godfrey,et al.  Validation of an Accelerometer to Quantify a Comprehensive Battery of Gait Characteristics in Healthy Older Adults and Parkinson's Disease: Toward Clinical and at Home Use , 2016, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[15]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Comparative assessment of different methods for the estimation of gait temporal parameters using a single inertial sensor: application to elderly, post-stroke, Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease subjects. , 2015, Gait & posture.

[16]  M L van der Linden,et al.  Validity and reliability of a kinematic protocol for determining foot contact events. , 2000, Gait & posture.