Estimating the diagnostic accuracy of three culture-dependent methods for the Listeria monocytogenes detection from a Bayesian perspective.

The objective of this study was to estimate the test accuracy measures (classification probabilities [CPs], predictive values [PVs], likelihood ratios [LRs] and area under receiving operating characteristic curve [AUC]) of three different culture-dependent methods, commonly used during routine analysis for the detection of the foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes, from a Bayesian perspective. Data from a previous study by Andritsos et al. (2010) were used to define measures of accuracy for the diagnostic tests. Samples of minced pork meat obtained from local markets were tested for L. monocytogenes presence by parallel testing using selective media (PALCAM, ALOA and RAPID'L.mono). Dirichlet distribution, which is the multivariate expression of a Beta distribution, was used to analyze the data. Bayesian analysis determines characteristics of the posterior distribution from available prior information. Results showed that all methods were best at ruling in L. monocytogenes presence than ruling it out. PALCAM seemed to have better performance based on positive PV, positive LR and AUC, but it was not so sensitive as RAPID'L.mono was. Results also showed that none of the media were perfect in detecting L. monocytogenes, i.e. sensitivity and specificity equal to one. Besides, the problem of observing zero counts may be overcome by applying Bayesian analysis, making the determination of a test performance feasible.

[1]  Performance of a chromogenic medium for the isolation of Listeria monocytogenes in food , 2008 .

[2]  Ian A Gardner,et al.  "TAGS", a program for the evaluation of test accuracy in the absence of a gold standard. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[3]  Washington,et al.  Considerations for establishing safety-based consume-by date labels for refrigerated ready-to-eat foods. , 2005 .

[4]  M. Wagner,et al.  A validated PCR-based method to detect Listeria monocytogenes using raw milk as a food model--towards an international standard. , 2004, Journal of food protection.

[5]  W. Holzapfel,et al.  Comparison of two chromogenic media for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes with the plating media recommended by EN/DIN 11290-1. , 2006, International journal of food microbiology.

[6]  R. Reissbrodt New chromogenic plating media for detection and enumeration of pathogenic Listeria spp.--an overview. , 2004, International journal of food microbiology.

[7]  P. Hansbro,et al.  Methods for the isolation and identification of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes: a review. , 2005, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[8]  Emmanuel Lesaffre,et al.  Estimating Disease Prevalence in a Bayesian Framework Using Probabilistic Constraints , 2006, Epidemiology.

[9]  W. Luf,et al.  Performance testing of six chromogenic ALOA‐type media for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes , 2009, Journal of applied microbiology.

[10]  V. Lafarge,et al.  Improvement of the detection of Listeria monocytogenes by the application of ALOA, a diagnostic, chromogenic isolation medium , 2000, Journal of applied microbiology.

[11]  Sophia Kathariou,et al.  Listeria monocytogenes virulence and pathogenicity, a food safety perspective. , 2002, Journal of food protection.

[12]  M Uyttendaele,et al.  A Bayesian modelling framework to estimate Campylobacter prevalence and culture methods sensitivity: application to a chicken meat survey in Belgium , 2008, Journal of applied microbiology.

[13]  Emmanuel Lesaffre,et al.  Bayes and diagnostic testing. , 2007, Veterinary parasitology.

[14]  J. McLauchlin The identification of Listeria species. , 1997, International journal of food microbiology.

[15]  B. Jarvis On the compositing of samples for qualitative microbiological testing , 2007, Letters in applied microbiology.