Localization of spatial attention processes with the aid of a probe technique.

A sudden visual onset is thought to 'attract attention to its location' within less than 100 ms. We attempted to measure the effect of this attentional process on the event-related potential (ERP) to a probe presented about 140 ms after the onset, and to delineate the spatiotemporal characteristics of such an effect, if any. ERPs were recorded from 30 channels from 6 subjects while they performed a target detection task. Both targets and probes could be located in each of the 4 quadrants (eccentricities 6.1 degrees and 7 degrees, respectively). For a given single target, the subsequent probe was either presented near the location of the target ('valid target') or at the diagonal opposite ('invalid target'). Appropriate 'neutral' conditions (probes preceded by no target, or by simultaneous targets in all quadrants) were applied, and ERPs to probes were corrected for the contribution of the ERPs to targets. The earliest effect of (in)validity was found at about 120 ms after probe onset for lower field probes. This effect consisted of enhanced posterior positivity for valid relative to neutral relative to invalid conditions. This positivity was superposed on a contralateral, extrastriate negative ongoing wave peaking at about 150 ms ('N150'). Source localization suggested that the (in)validity effects originate from deep medial parietal areas. The source corresponding to the N150 activity was not influenced by (in)validity. An earlier deflection to the probe at 80 ms ('NP80') depended on location, but not on (in)validity, and seemed to be of striate origin. Results are discussed in terms of a model postulating an attention-independent 'input module' from which activation is fed to a 'location module' embodying the actual attention mechanism.

[1]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[2]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Determinants of Negative Priming , 1995 .

[3]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Attention : selection, awareness, and control : a tribute to Donald Broadbent , 1996 .

[4]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Analysis of striate activity underlying the pattern onset EP of children , 1992, Vision Research.

[5]  J. Kenemans,et al.  Removal of the ocular artifact from the EEG: a comparison of time and frequency domain methods with simulated and real data. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[6]  S. Shipp,et al.  The functional logic of cortical connections , 1988, Nature.

[7]  A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al.  Selective Attention in Vision , 1991 .

[8]  E. Fox Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[10]  R. Rafal,et al.  The neurology of inhibition: Integrating controlled and automatic processes. , 1994 .

[11]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[12]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[13]  A. H. C. Heijden,et al.  The effects of advance location cueing on latencies in a single-letter recognition task , 1988, Psychological research.

[14]  G Mulder,et al.  Attention to color: an analysis of selection, controlled search, and motor activation, using event-related potentials. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[15]  S. Luck,et al.  Attention-Related Modulation of Sensory-Evoked Brain Activity in a Visual Search Task , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  M. Eimer An ERP study on visual spatial priming with peripheral onsets. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[18]  J P Joseph,et al.  Modifications of the pattern-evoked potential (PEP) in relation to the stimulated part of the visual field (clues for the most probable origin of each component). , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[20]  C. Geula,et al.  Architecture of connectivity within a cingulo-fronto-parietal neurocognitive network for directed attention. , 1993, Archives of neurology.

[21]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  C. Olson,et al.  Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: the anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  G. Romani,et al.  Auditory evoked magnetic fields and electric potentials , 1990 .

[24]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans , 1994, Nature.

[25]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  R. Eason Visual evoked potential correlates of early neural filtering during selective attention , 1981 .

[27]  M. Verbaten,et al.  Event-Related Brain Research , 1991 .

[28]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A PET study of visuospatial attention , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  H J Müller,et al.  Spatial Cueing and the Relation between the Accuracy of “Where” and “What” Decisions in Visual Search , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[31]  Gijsbertus Mulder,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of the spatial distribution of attention to colored stimuli in focused and divided attention conditions , 1989, Biological Psychology.

[32]  G. Mangun Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[33]  A Kok,et al.  Event-related potentials to conjunctions of spatial frequency and orientation as a function of stimulus parameters and response requirements. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  T W Picton,et al.  Separation and identification of event-related potential components by brain electric source analysis. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[35]  N. Lesevre CHRONOTOPOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS OF THE HUMAN EVOKED POTENTIAL IN RELATION TO THE VISUAL FIELD (DATA FROM NORMAL INDIVIDUALS AND HEMIANOPIC PATIENTS) , 1982 .

[36]  M. Scherg Fundamentals if dipole source potential analysis , 1990 .

[37]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. , 1994 .

[38]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[39]  H Spekreijse,et al.  The extrastriate generators of the EP to checkerboard onset. A source localization approach. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[40]  M Eimer,et al.  Spatial cueing, sensory gating and selective response preparation: an ERP study on visuo-spatial orienting. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[41]  A. V. D. Heijden,et al.  Complete dependence of color identification upon color localization in a single-item task , 1995 .

[42]  D A Allport,et al.  Perceptual integration of identity, location and colour , 1986, Psychological research.

[43]  G D Logan On the Relation between Identifying and Locating Masked Targets in Visual Search , 1975, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  Klaus P. Ebmeier,et al.  The Neuropsychiatric Sequelae of Mercury Poisoning , 1995, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[45]  David LaBerge,et al.  Computational and anatomical models of selective attention in object identification. , 1995 .

[46]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .