Adoption of Stream Fencing Among Dairy Farmers in Four New Zealand Catchments

The effect of dairy farming on water quality in New Zealand streams has been identified as an important environmental issue. Stream fencing, to keep cattle out of streams, is seen as a way to improve water quality. Fencing ensures that cattle cannot defecate in the stream, prevents bank erosion, and protects the aquatic habitat. Stream fencing targets have been set by the dairy industry. In this paper the results of a study to identify the factors influencing dairy farmers’ decisions to adopt stream fencing are outlined. Qualitative methods were used to gather data from 30 dairy farmers in four New Zealand catchments. Results suggest that farm contextual factors influenced farmers’ decision making when considering stream fencing. Farmers were classified into four segments based on their reasons for investing in stream fencing. These reasons were fencing boundaries, fencing for stock control, fencing to protect animal health, and fencing because of pressure to conform to local government guidelines or industry codes of practice. This suggests that adoption may be slow in the absence of on-farm benefits, that promotion of stream fencing needs to be strongly linked to on-farm benefits, and that regulation could play a role in ensuring greater adoption of stream fencing.

[1]  R. Monaghan,et al.  The impact of potential nitrous oxide mitigation strategies on the environmental and economic performance of dairy systems in four New Zealand catchments , 2005 .

[2]  B. Caruso.  Comparative Analysis of New Zealand and US Approaches for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Management , 2000, Environmental management.

[3]  Allan Curtis,et al.  Understanding landholder management of river frontages: The Goulburn Broken , 2003 .

[4]  G. Marshall,et al.  Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders , 2006 .

[5]  B. Niven,et al.  Farmers, Streams, Information, and Money: Does Informing Farmers About Riparian Management Have Any Effect? , 2002, Environmental management.

[6]  Ross M. Monaghan,et al.  Land‐use impacts and water quality targets in the intensive dairying catchment of the Toenepi Stream, New Zealand , 2006 .

[7]  D. Smeaton,et al.  A desktop evaluation of the environmental and economic performance of model dairy farming systems within four New Zealand catchments , 2022 .

[8]  R. Monaghan,et al.  Linkages between land management activities and water quality in an intensively farmed catchment in southern New Zealand , 2007 .

[9]  T. G. Parminter,et al.  A study of farmer attitudes towards riparian management practices , 1998 .

[10]  Geoff Kaine,et al.  Adoption of sustainable irrigation management practices by stone and pome fruit growers in the Goulburn/Murray Valleys, Australia , 2005, Irrigation Science.

[11]  Timothy Bock,et al.  Small Sample Market Research , 2002 .

[12]  R. McDowell,et al.  Particulate phosphorus transport within stream flow of an agricultural catchment. , 2004, Journal of environmental quality.

[13]  A. J. Belsky,et al.  SURVEY OF LIVESTOCK INFLUENCES ON STREAM AND RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEMS IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES , 1999 .

[14]  Oliver Buck,et al.  Scale-dependence of land use effects on water quality of streams in agricultural catchments. , 2004, Environmental pollution.

[15]  Denise Bewsell,et al.  Using market research to understand the adoption of irrigation management strategies in the stone and pome fruit industry , 2005 .

[16]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  Adopting sustainable farm management practices within a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone in Scotland: the view from the farm , 2006 .

[17]  B. Caruso.  Risk-based targeting of diffuse contaminant sources at variable spatial scales in a New Zealand high country catchment. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  J. Barnett,et al.  Water quality of a lowland stream in a New Zealand dairy farming catchment , 1999 .