Spatial Representations From Perception and Cognitive Mediation

Spatial representations can be derived not only by direct perception, but also through cognitive mediation. Conventional or ex-situ ultrasound displays, which displace imaged data to a remote screen, require both types of process. To determine the depth of a target hidden beneath a surface, ultrasound users must both perceive how deeply the ultrasound transducer indents the surface and interpret the on-screen image to visualize how deeply the target lies below the transducer. Combining these perceptual and cognitive depth components requires a spatial representation that has been called amodal. We report experiments measuring errors in perceptual and cognitively mediated depth estimates and show that these estimates can be concatenated (linked) without further error, providing evidence for an amodal representation. We further contrast conventional ultrasound with an in-situ display whereby an ultrasound image appears to float at the precise location being imaged, enabling the depth of a target to be directly perceived. The research has the potential to enhance ultrasound-guided surgical intervention.

[1]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Mental concatenation of perceptually and cognitively specified depth to represent locations in near space , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  M. Chi,et al.  The Nature of Expertise , 1988 .

[3]  Jeffrey S. Katz,et al.  Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[4]  R. Glaser,et al.  Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing x-ray pictures. , 1988 .

[5]  G. Stetten,et al.  Overlaying ultrasonographic images on direct vision. , 2001, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[6]  D. R. Montello,et al.  The Role of Spatial Cognition in Medicine: Applications for Selecting and Training Professionals. , 2007 .

[7]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Functional Equivalence of Spatial Images Produced by Perception and Spatial Language , 2007 .

[8]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[9]  George D. Stetten,et al.  Psychophysical evaluation of in-situ ultrasound visualization , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[10]  Roberta L Klatzky,et al.  Spatial updating of locations specified by 3-d sound and spatial language. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of integrating ground information , 2004, Nature.

[12]  I Moar,et al.  Memory for Routes , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  S. Doherty,et al.  A conceptual model and empirical analysis of children's acquisition of spatial knowledge , 1985 .

[14]  Roberta L Klatzky,et al.  Functional equivalence of spatial representations derived from vision and language: evidence from allocentric judgments. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  D. Holding,et al.  Acquisition of Route Network Knowledge by Males and Females , 1989 .

[16]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Embodiment, ego-space, and action , 2008 .

[17]  Aaron P. Blaisdell,et al.  Integration of spatial maps in pigeons , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Information integration in perception and communication , 1996 .

[19]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Encoding, learning, and spatial updating of multiple object locations specified by 3-D sound, spatial language, and vision , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  F. Mast,et al.  Spatial processing in navigation, imagery and perception , 2007 .