Optimization of the difference-of-Gaussian channel sets for the channelized Hotelling observer

Abstract. The channelized-Hotelling observer (CHO) was investigated as a surrogate of human observers in task-based image quality assessment. The CHO with difference-of-Gaussian (DoG) channels has shown potential for the prediction of human detection performance in digital mammography (DM) images. However, the DoG channels employ parameters that describe the shape of each channel. The selection of these parameters influences the performance of the DoG CHO and needs further investigation. The detection performance of the DoG CHO was calculated and correlated with the detection performance of three humans who evaluated DM images in 2-alternative forced-choice experiments. A set of DM images of an anthropomorphic breast phantom with and without calcification-like signals was acquired at four different dose levels. For each dose level, 200 square regions-of-interest (ROIs) with and without signal were extracted. Signal detectability was assessed on ROI basis using the CHO with various DoG channel parameters and it was compared to that of the human observers. It was found that varying these DoG parameter values affects the correlation (r2) of the CHO with human observers for the detection task investigated. In conclusion, it appears that the the optimal DoG channel sets that maximize the prediction ability of the CHO might be dependent on the type of background and signal of ROIs investigated.

[1]  Matthew A Kupinski,et al.  Correlation between a 2D channelized Hotelling observer and human observers in a low‐contrast detection task with multislice reading in CT , 2017, Medical physics.

[2]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  New difference of Gaussian channel-sets for the channelized Hotelling observer? , 2019, Medical Imaging.

[3]  D R Dance,et al.  Can the channelized Hotelling observer including aspects of the human visual system predict human observer performance in mammography? , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[4]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Signal template generation from acquired mammographic images for the non-prewhitening model observer with eye-filter , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Comparison of Channel Methods and Observer Models for the Task-Based Assessment of Multi-Projection Imaging in the Presence of Structured Anatomical Noise , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Can a channelized Hotelling observer assess image quality in acquired mammographic images of an anthropomorphic breast phantom including image processing? , 2019, Medical physics.

[7]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques , 2009 .

[8]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Incorporating Human Contrast Sensitivity in Model Observers for Detection Tasks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  A model observer study using acquired mammographic images of an anthropomorphic breast phantom , 2018, Medical physics.

[11]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  A. Burgess Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.

[13]  Damien Racine,et al.  Objective assessment of low contrast detectability in computed tomography with Channelized Hotelling Observer. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[14]  Rongping Zeng,et al.  Evaluating the sensitivity of the optimization of acquisition geometry to the choice of reconstruction algorithm in digital breast tomosynthesis through a simulation study. , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  H.H. Barrett,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[16]  D. Dance Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Optimization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) acquisition parameters for human observers: effect of reconstruction algorithms , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  D R Dance,et al.  Can the non-pre-whitening model observer, including aspects of the human visual system, predict human observer performance in mammography? , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[20]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Toward objective and quantitative evaluation of imaging systems using images of phantoms. , 2006, Medical physics.