Enhanced Efficiency of Cd-Free Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2 Minimodule Via (Zn,Mg)O Second Buffer Layer and Alkali Metal Post-Treatment

New record efficiencies have been achieved on Cd-free Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2 thin-film photovoltaic submodules prepared by a two-step sulfurization after selenization process. Aperture area efficiencies of 19.2% and 19.8% were independently confirmed on a 30 cm × 30 cm submodule (841 cm2) and on a 7 cm × 5 cm minimodule (24.2 cm2), respectively. These achievements were brought about by transferring several key techniques, especially atomic layer deposited (Zn,Mg)O second buffer layer and K treatment of the absorber surface, from the fundamental study of small-area cell development. The former technique was applied to the submodule and both techniques were implemented into the minimodule. The (Zn,Mg)O second buffer layer increases transmittance of the window layer and improves junction quality resulting in the reduced interface recombination. The K treatment, which was developed by reference to the postdeposition treatment widely used in the co-evaporation process, significantly enhances open-circuit voltage and fill factor. Several material and device characterizations performed to illuminate the effects of the K treatment showed that increased free carrier concentration and reduced carrier recombination throughout the whole absorber film contributed to the improved performance. Contrary to the conventional postdeposition treatment in the co-evaporation process, significant depletion of Cu at the absorber surface was not observed, which can be attributed to S-rich circumstances of our absorber surface. The achievement of nearly 20% efficiency on the minimodule having identical structure to the production modules ensures further performance improvements in industrial Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2 modules in the near future.

[1]  W. Shafarman,et al.  Bulk and metastable defects in CuIn1−xGaxSe2 thin films using drive-level capacitance profiling , 2004 .

[2]  A. Forchel,et al.  Minority-carrier lifetime and efficiency of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells , 1998 .

[3]  E. Handick,et al.  Potassium Postdeposition Treatment-Induced Band Gap Widening at Cu(In,Ga)Se₂ Surfaces--Reason for Performance Leap? , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[4]  H. Sugimoto High efficiency and large volume production of CIS-based modules , 2014, 2014 IEEE 40th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC).

[5]  Philip Jackson,et al.  Effects of heavy alkali elements in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with efficiencies up to 22.6% , 2016 .

[6]  G. Kühn,et al.  Phase relations in the ternary system Cu-In-Se , 1987 .

[7]  R. Reedy,et al.  Enhanced Performance in Cu(In,Ga)Se$_{\bf 2}$ Solar Cells Fabricated by the Two-Step Selenization Process With a Potassium Fluoride Postdeposition Treatment , 2014, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[8]  T. Nakada,et al.  Effect of potassium fluoride post-deposition treatment on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films and solar cells fabricated onto sodalime glass substrates , 2016 .

[9]  H. Schock,et al.  Na incorporation into Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cell absorbers deposited on polyimide: Impact on the chemical and electronic surface structure , 2012 .

[10]  Takuya Kato,et al.  New world record Cu(In, Ga)(Se, S)2 thin film solar cell efficiency beyond 22% , 2016, 2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).

[11]  T. Wada,et al.  Crystallographic and optical properties of Cu , 2014 .

[12]  B. Ahn,et al.  Design of energy band alignment at the Zn(1-x)Mg(x)O/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 interface for Cd-free Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. , 2012, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[13]  I. Repins,et al.  19·9%‐efficient ZnO/CdS/CuInGaSe2 solar cell with 81·2% fill factor , 2008 .

[14]  D. Hariskos,et al.  Compositional investigation of potassium doped Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with efficiencies up to 20.8% , 2014 .

[15]  Motoshi Nakamura,et al.  Recent R&D progress in solar frontier's small-sized Cu(InGa)(SeS)2 solar cells , 2014, 2014 IEEE 40th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC).

[16]  Andreas Bauer,et al.  Properties of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with new record efficiencies up to 21.7% , 2015 .

[17]  H. Schock,et al.  Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Thin-Film Solar Cells , 2003 .

[18]  R. Menozzi,et al.  Alkali-templated surface nanopatterning of chalcogenide thin films: a novel approach toward solar cells with enhanced efficiency. , 2015, Nano letters.

[19]  Hans Zogg,et al.  Efficiency enhancement of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells due to post-deposition Na incorporation , 2004 .

[20]  Rakesh Agrawal,et al.  Generalized quantum efficiency analysis for non-ideal solar cells: Case of Cu2ZnSnSe4 , 2016 .

[21]  S. Nishiwaki,et al.  Unveiling the effects of post-deposition treatment with different alkaline elements on the electronic properties of CIGS thin film solar cells. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[22]  Y. Hirai,et al.  Control of valence band offset at CdS/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 interface by inserting wide-bandgap materials for suppression of interfacial recombination in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells , 2015 .

[23]  L. Mansfield,et al.  Wide bandgap Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with improved energy conversion efficiency , 2012 .

[24]  W. Warta,et al.  Solar cell efficiency tables (version 50) , 2017 .

[25]  D. Abou‐Ras,et al.  Characterization of Grain Boundaries in Cu(In,Ga)Se$_{\bf 2}$ Films Using Atom-Probe Tomography , 2011, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[26]  M. Powalla,et al.  Efficiency enhancement of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin‐film solar cells by a post‐deposition treatment with potassium fluoride , 2013 .

[27]  D. Hariskos,et al.  New world record efficiency for Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin‐film solar cells beyond 20% , 2011 .

[28]  T. Kato Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2 solar cell research in Solar Frontier: Progress and current status , 2017 .

[29]  R. Klenk,et al.  Experimental indication for band gap widening of chalcopyrite solar cell absorbers after potassium fluoride treatment , 2014 .

[30]  M. Lux‐Steiner,et al.  Determination of the band gap depth profile of the penternary Cu(In(1−X)GaX)(SYSe(1−Y))2 chalcopyrite from its composition gradient , 2004 .

[31]  Debora Keller,et al.  Potassium-induced surface modification of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films for high-efficiency solar cells. , 2013, Nature materials.

[32]  Takashi Minemoto,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the effect of conduction band offset of window/CIS layers on performance of CIS solar cells using device simulation , 2001 .

[33]  Thomas Feurer,et al.  Progress in thin film CIGS photovoltaics – Research and development, manufacturing, and applications , 2017 .

[34]  H. Sugimoto,et al.  Characterization of the Back Contact of CIGS Solar Cell as the Origin of “Rollover” Effect , 2016 .

[35]  L. J. Giling,et al.  Phase relations in the system Cu2S-In2S3 , 1980 .

[36]  W. Warta,et al.  Solar cell efficiency tables (version 49) , 2017 .

[37]  H. Sugimoto,et al.  From 20.9 to 22.3% Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 solar cell: Reduced recombination rate at the heterojunction and the depletion region due to K-treatment , 2017 .

[38]  S. Grover,et al.  A recombination analysis of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with low and high Ga compositions , 2014 .