Frequency of carcinoma at secondary imaging-guided percutaneous breast biopsy performed after a high-risk pathologic result at primary biopsy.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of carcinoma identified with secondary presurgical imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy for patients with high-risk pathologic findings at primary percutaneous biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective computerized search of our breast imaging database from January 1, 2005, to October 1, 2010, was conducted to identify the cases of patients with high-risk pathologic findings at primary biopsy who underwent at least one secondary biopsy within 9 months and underwent surgical excision. Lesion type, location, biopsy guidance, device, number of samples, and histopathologic findings were recorded. The pathologic findings at surgical excision were compared with the percutaneous biopsy results. RESULTS One hundred twenty-three patients underwent 158 secondary biopsies. On average, 1.3 additional biopsies were performed per patient. Among the 158 secondary biopsies, 105 (66.4%) had benign, 48 (30.4%) had high-risk, and five (3.2%) had malignant histopathologic findings. No malignant tumors were identified at secondary percutaneous biopsies in cases in which the same lesion type was biopsied in the same quadrant. Use of secondary percutaneous biopsy led to detection of nine malignant tumors in 7.3% of patients-with percutaneous biopsy in four (3.2%) patients and at surgical excision in five (4.1%) patients. CONCLUSION After initial imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy reveals high-risk pathologic findings, identification of additional high-risk lesions at secondary percutaneous biopsy is common, and detection of malignancy is relatively infrequent. However, because the secondarily identified high-risk lesions are sometimes upstaged to cancer at surgical excision, additional imaging-directed biopsy has potential benefit for patients with known highrisk lesions and multiple synchronous findings.

[1]  E. Deperi,et al.  Long-Term Follow-up of Lobular Neoplasia (Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia/Lobular Carcinoma In Situ) Diagnosed on Core Needle Biopsy , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[2]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Progression risk of columnar cell lesions of the breast diagnosed in core needle biopsies , 2011, International journal of cancer.

[3]  A. Tanimoto,et al.  Mucocele-like lesions of the breast: a long-term follow-up study , 2011, Diagnostic pathology.

[4]  D. Noh,et al.  Papillary Lesions Initially Diagnosed at Ultrasound-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy: Rate of Malignancy Based on Subsequent Surgical Excision , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[5]  Aye Moe Thu Ma,et al.  Multi‐Centric Breast Cancer Involving a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt , 2010, The breast journal.

[6]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Frequency, upgrade rates, and characteristics of high-risk lesions initially identified with breast MRI. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  D. Rayson,et al.  Flat Epithelial Atypia on Breast Needle Core Biopsy: A Retrospective Study with Clinical–Pathological Correlation , 2010, The breast journal.

[8]  L. Salomon,et al.  Risk of invasive breast cancer after lobular intra-epithelial neoplasia: review of the literature. , 2010, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[9]  N. Khouri,et al.  Incidental Minimal Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia on Core Needle Biopsy: Correlation With Findings on Follow-up Excision , 2010, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[10]  J. Youk,et al.  Atypical papilloma diagnosed by sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast mass. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  B. Deyarmin,et al.  Chromosomal Alterations in Pure Nonneoplastic Breast Lesions: Implications for Breast Cancer Progression , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  C. Sagan,et al.  Pure flat epithelial atypia (DIN 1a) on core needle biopsy: study of 60 biopsies with follow-up surgical excision , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[13]  S. Raza,et al.  Management of Intraductal Papillomas of the Breast: An Analysis of 129 Cases and Their Outcome , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[14]  Christopher Mills,et al.  Papillary lesions of the breast diagnosed by core needle biopsy: 71 cases with surgical follow-up. , 2009, American journal of surgery.

[15]  W. Yang,et al.  Management of radial sclerosing lesions of the breast diagnosed using percutaneous vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy: recommendations for excision based on seven years’ of experience at a single institution , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[16]  A. Nonni,et al.  Diagnosing Papillary Lesions Using Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: Should Conservative or Surgical Management Follow? , 2008, Oncology Research and Treatment.

[17]  E. Mendelson,et al.  Atypical lobular hyperplasia and classic lobular carcinoma in situ in core biopsy specimens: routine excision is not necessary , 2008, Modern Pathology.

[18]  D. Dabbs,et al.  Frequency and clinical significance of simultaneous association of lobular neoplasia and columnar cell alterations in breast tissue specimens. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[19]  S. Jaffer,et al.  Lobular neoplasia on core needle biopsy does not require excision , 2008, Cancer.

[20]  I. Ellis,et al.  The significance of lobular neoplasia on needle core biopsy of the breast , 2008, Virchows Archiv.

[21]  G. Gong,et al.  Papillary lesions of the breast diagnosed at percutaneous sonographically guided biopsy: comparison of sonographic features and biopsy methods. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  G. Zografos,et al.  Breast Ductal Endoscopy: Do Not Neglect Education , 2008, Oncology Research and Treatment.

[23]  W. Wood,et al.  Surgical Follow-Up and Clinical Presentation of 142 Breast Papillary Lesions Diagnosed by Ultrasound-Guided Core-Needle Biopsy , 2008, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[24]  N. Arora,et al.  Clinicopathologic features of papillary lesions on core needle biopsy of the breast predictive of malignancy. , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[25]  M. Kerin,et al.  Radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions and malignancy in a screening programme: incidence and histological features revisited , 2007, Histopathology.

[26]  Ralph T. Wynn,et al.  Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  T. Hijaz,et al.  Underestimation of the presence of breast carcinoma in papillary lesions initially diagnosed at core-needle biopsy. , 2007, Radiology.

[28]  M. Mahoney,et al.  Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  Norman Wolmark,et al.  Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[30]  R. Vierkant,et al.  An Analysis of Breast Cancer Risk in Women With Single, Multiple, and Atypical Papilloma , 2006, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[31]  G. Tse,et al.  Role of radiologic features in the management of papillary lesions of the breast. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  L. Liberman,et al.  Is surgical excision warranted after benign, concordant diagnosis of papilloma at percutaneous breast biopsy? , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  M. Latour,et al.  Management of radial scars found at percutaneous breast biopsy. , 2006, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[34]  J. Cangiarella,et al.  Papillary lesions of the breast at percutaneous core-needle biopsy. , 2006, Radiology.

[35]  A. Ricci,et al.  Follow-up surgical excision is indicated when breast core needle biopsies show atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ. , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[36]  C. Griffith,et al.  All radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions seen on breast screening mammograms should be excised. , 2005, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[37]  J. Silverman,et al.  Follow-up Surgical Excision Is Indicated When Breast Core Needle Biopsies Show Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia or Lobular Carcinoma In Situ: A Correlative Study of 33 Patients With Review of the Literature , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[38]  I. Haigh,et al.  Needle core biopsy can reliably distinguish between benign and malignant papillary lesions of the breast , 2005, Histopathology.

[39]  G. Farshid,et al.  Assessment of 142 Stellate Lesions With Imaging Features Suggestive of Radial Scar Discovered During Population-based Screening for Breast Cancer , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[40]  A. Renshaw,et al.  Papillomas and atypical papillomas in breast core needle biopsy specimens: risk of carcinoma in subsequent excision. , 2004, American journal of clinical pathology.

[41]  B. McNeil,et al.  Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[42]  N. Sneige,et al.  Accuracy of core needle biopsy diagnosis in assessing papillary breast lesions: histologic predictors of malignancy , 2004, Modern Pathology.

[43]  J. Cawson,et al.  Fourteen‐gauge needle core biopsy of mammographically evident radial scars , 2003, Cancer.

[44]  P. Tartter,et al.  The Significance of Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia at Percutaneous Breast Biopsy , 2003, The breast journal.

[45]  Mary Scott Soo,et al.  Imaging-guided core needle biopsy of papillary lesions of the breast. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[46]  W. P. Evans,et al.  Percutaneous core needle biopsy of radial scars of the breast: when is excision necessary? , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[47]  D. Ikeda,et al.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? , 2002, Radiology.

[48]  Mythreyi Bhargavan,et al.  Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. , 2001, Radiology.

[49]  D. Georgian-Smith,et al.  Calcifications of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[50]  W. P. Evans,et al.  Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. , 2001, Radiology.

[51]  Darrell N. Smith,et al.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[52]  C. Lee,et al.  Underestimation of breast cancer with II-gauge vacuum suction biopsy. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[53]  F. Greene,et al.  Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by Mammotome? , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[54]  C. Lee,et al.  Uncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importance. , 2000, Radiology.

[55]  A. Stavros,et al.  Incidental treatment of nipple discharge caused by benign intraductal papilloma through diagnostic Mammotome biopsy. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[56]  R. Brem,et al.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[57]  R. J. Jackman,et al.  Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. , 1999, Radiology.

[58]  G. Colditz,et al.  Radial scars in benign breast-biopsy specimens and the risk of breast cancer. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[59]  C K Redmond,et al.  Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[60]  G. Farr,et al.  Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[61]  W. P. Evans,et al.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. , 1997, Radiology.

[62]  H. Frierson,et al.  Association of breast cancer with the finding of atypical ductal hyperplasia at core breast biopsy. , 1997, Annals of surgery.

[63]  L. Liberman,et al.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[64]  G. W. Eklund,et al.  Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. , 1994, Radiology.

[65]  R. J. Jackman,et al.  Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. , 1994, Radiology.

[66]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Radial scars of the breast: review of 38 consecutive mammographic diagnoses. , 1993, Radiology.