Decadal Variability in Land Carbon Sink Efficiency Reveals Apparent Trend Reversal After 2009

Background: The climate mitigation target of limiting the temperature increase below 2 °C above the pre-industrial levels requires the efforts from all countries. Tracking the trajectory of the land carbon sink efficiency is thus crucial to evaluate the nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Here, we define the instantaneous land sink efficiency as the ratio of natural land carbon sinks to emissions from fossil fuel and land-use and land-cover change with a value of 1 indicating carbon neutrality to track its temporal dynamics in the past decades.Results: Land sink efficiency has been decreasing during 1957-1990 because of the increased emissions from fossil fuel. After the effect of the Pinatubo eruption diminished (after 1994), the land sink efficiency firstly increased before 2009 and then began to decrease again after 2009. This reversal around 2009 is mostly attributed to changes in land sinks in Latin America in response to climate variations.Conclusions: The decreasing trend of land sink efficiency in the recent years reveals greater challenges in climate change mitigation, and impacts of climate on land carbon sinks need to be accurately quantified to assess the implementation of climate mitigation policies.

[1]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Fire decline in dry tropical ecosystems enhances decadal land carbon sink , 2020, Nature Communications.

[2]  Tomoko Hasegawa,et al.  Harmonization of Global Land-Use Change and Management for the Period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6 , 2020 .

[3]  David Kenfack,et al.  Asynchronous carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian tropical forests , 2020, Nature.

[4]  P. Ciais,et al.  Historical CO2 emissions from land-use and land-cover change and their uncertainty , 2020 .

[5]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Sources of Uncertainty in Regional and Global Terrestrial CO2 Exchange Estimates , 2020, Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

[6]  André C. P. L. F. de Carvalho,et al.  TerraBrasilis: A Spatial Data Analytics Infrastructure for Large-Scale Thematic Mapping , 2019, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[7]  Arnaud Mialon,et al.  Satellite-observed pantropical carbon dynamics , 2019, Nature Plants.

[8]  S. Zaehle,et al.  The fate of carbon in a mature forest under carbon dioxide enrichment , 2019, bioRxiv.

[9]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Five decades of northern land carbon uptake revealed by the interhemispheric CO2 gradient , 2019, Nature.

[10]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2016 , 2016 .

[12]  J. Marotzke,et al.  ENSO Change in Climate Projections: Forced Response or Internal Variability? , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[13]  S. Zaehle,et al.  Plant Regrowth as a Driver of Recent Enhancement of Terrestrial CO2 Uptake , 2018 .

[14]  S. Zaehle,et al.  How does the terrestrial carbon exchange respond to inter-annual climatic variations? A quantification based on atmospheric CO 2 data , 2018 .

[15]  Vivek K Arora,et al.  Reduction in global area burned and wildfire emissions since 1930s enhances carbon uptake by land , 2018, Nature Communications.

[16]  P. Forster,et al.  Implications of possible interpretations of ‘greenhouse gas balance’ in the Paris Agreement , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2018 , 2014, Earth System Science Data.

[18]  Dell,et al.  Contrasting carbon cycle responses of the tropical continents to the 2015–2016 El Niño , 2017, Science.

[19]  Richard A. Houghton,et al.  Global and regional fluxes of carbon from land use and land cover change 1850–2015 , 2017 .

[20]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  The key role of forests in meeting climate targets requires science for credible mitigation , 2017 .

[21]  J. Canadell,et al.  Reducing uncertainties in decadal variability of the global carbon budget with multiple datasets , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  P. Cox,et al.  Projected land photosynthesis constrained by changes in the seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO2 , 2016, Nature.

[23]  Susan G. Letcher,et al.  Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics , 2016, Science Advances.

[24]  Susan G. Letcher,et al.  Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests , 2016, Nature.

[25]  P. Ciais,et al.  Top–down assessment of the Asian carbon budget since the mid 1990s , 2015, Nature Communications.

[26]  E. Hansis,et al.  Relevance of methodological choices for accounting of land use change carbon fluxes , 2015 .

[27]  C. Kobayashi,et al.  The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Specifications and Basic Characteristics , 2015 .

[28]  R. Houghton,et al.  Terminology as a key uncertainty in net land use and land cover change carbon flux estimates , 2014 .

[29]  P. Jones,et al.  Updated high‐resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset , 2014 .

[30]  A. Timmermann,et al.  Increasing frequency of extreme El Niño events due to greenhouse warming , 2014 .

[31]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  A two-fold increase of carbon cycle sensitivity to tropical temperature variations , 2014, Nature.

[32]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  The declining uptake rate of atmospheric CO2 by land and ocean sinks , 2013 .

[33]  Y. Niwa,et al.  Global atmospheric carbon budget: results from an ensemble of atmospheric CO2 inversions. , 2013 .

[34]  J. Canadell,et al.  Variations in atmospheric CO2 growth rates coupled with tropical temperature , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  P. Ciais,et al.  A theoretical framework for the net land-to-atmosphere CO 2 flux and its implications in the definition of "emissions from land-use change" , 2013 .

[36]  P. Cox,et al.  Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability , 2013, Nature.

[37]  K. Wolter,et al.  El Niño/Southern Oscillation behaviour since 1871 as diagnosed in an extended multivariate ENSO index (MEI.ext) , 2011 .

[38]  Fabienne Maignan,et al.  CO2 surface fluxes at grid point scale estimated from a global 21 year reanalysis of atmospheric measurements , 2010 .

[39]  A. Rogers,et al.  Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[40]  P. Cox,et al.  Impact of changes in diffuse radiation on the global land carbon sink , 2009, Nature.

[41]  P. Ciais,et al.  Net carbon dioxide losses of northern ecosystems in response to autumn warming , 2008, Nature.

[42]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Scott D. Peckham,et al.  Fire as the dominant driver of central Canadian boreal forest carbon balance , 2007, Nature.

[44]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Growing season extension and its impact on terrestrial carbon cycle in the Northern Hemisphere over the past 2 decades , 2007 .

[45]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Sander Houweling,et al.  CO 2 flux history 1982–2001 inferred from atmospheric data using a global inversion of atmospheric transport , 2003 .

[47]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Climatic Control of the High-Latitude Vegetation Greening Trend and Pinatubo Effect , 2002, Science.

[48]  J. Wallace,et al.  A Pacific Interdecadal Climate Oscillation with Impacts on Salmon Production , 1997 .