Unit commitment considering generation flexibility and environmental constraints

This paper proposes a new framework for the power system unit commitment process, incorporating generation flexibility requirements and environmental constraints into the existing unit commitment algorithm. The generation flexibility requirements are to address the uncertainty and variability associated with large amounts of intermittent resources as well as with load, which cause real-time balancing requirements to be variable and less predictable. The proposed flexibility requirements include capacity, ramp-rate and energy (or ramp duration) for both upward and downward balancing reserves. The environmental constraints include emission limits for fossil fuelfired generators and ecological regulations for hydro power plants. The calculation of emission rates is formulated. Unit commitment under this new framework will be critical to the economic and reliable operation of the power grid and the minimization of its negative environmental impacts, especially when high penetration levels of intermittent resources are being approached, as required by the renewable portfolio standards in many states.

[1]  Shuai Lu,et al.  The future impact of wind on BPA power system ancillary services , 2008, 2008 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition.

[2]  R. Quentin Grafton,et al.  Water Resources Planning and Management: Urban water supply and management , 2011 .

[3]  Y. V. Makarov,et al.  Integration of wind generation and load forecast uncertainties into power grid operations , 2010, IEEE PES T&D 2010.

[4]  G. Joos,et al.  Generalized Estimation of Average Displaced Emissions by Wind Generation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Short-term generation scheduling with transmission and environmental constraints using an augmented Lagrangian relaxation , 1995 .

[6]  Erik Lundtang Petersen,et al.  Environmental impacts of wind-energy projects , 2007 .

[7]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Initial evaluation of the impact of post-combustion capture of carbon dioxide on supercritical pulverised coal power plant part load performance , 2007 .

[8]  Lora L Pinkerton,et al.  Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants Volume 1a: Bituminous Coal (PC) and Natural Gas to Electricity Revision 3 , 2011 .

[9]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Unit commitment with flexible generating units , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Hal E. Cardwell,et al.  Designing Instream Flows to Satisfy Fish and Human Water Needs , 1996 .

[11]  A. Turgeon Optimal scheduling of thermal generating units , 1978 .

[12]  Shigeki Morita,et al.  State-of-the-art Technologies for the 1,000-MW 24.5-MPa/600°C/600°C Coal-fired Boiler , 1999 .

[13]  G. Cornelis van Kooten,et al.  Wind integration into various generation mixtures , 2009 .

[14]  Shuai Lu,et al.  Prediction of power system balancing requirement and tail event , 2010, IEEE PES T&D 2010.