Compatibility of postural behavior induced by two aspects of visual feedback: time delay and scale display

Fourteen healthy adults were tested to assess the potential influence on stance maintenance of two parts of the visual feedback technique (display scale and time delay). The task consisted in their keeping a spot on the screen representing their center of pressure, CoP (i.e. successive points of application of the ground reaction forces detected by the force platform on which they were standing) to a minimum size. The analysis focused on elementary motions computed from the complex CoP trajectories, that is the horizontal motion of the center of gravity (CoGh) and the difference between the CoP and the vertical projection of the center of gravity (CoP−CoGv). The former is recognized as the main variable in postural control, and several interesting features can be extracted from the latter. The results indicate that setting a delay and increasing the display scale induce substantial reductions in CoP−CoGv and CoGh displacements, respectively. Interestingly, when the two effects are combined, these single effects cohabit quite happily. Fractional Brownian motion modeling of these trajectories revealed clearly that, in each case, these effects originate principally from poor or improved control, respectively. This feature confirms that these elementary motions are involved differently in the postural system and that study of the complex CoP might not be of great interest. By generating opposing but complementary trends, the visual feedback technique should thus be perceived as a promising tool for inducing particular postural behavior in healthy and disabled individuals.

[1]  Ma Gresty,et al.  Vestibular and Visual Control on Posture and Locomotor Equilibrium , 1986 .

[2]  Akira Takagi,et al.  A New Method of Statokinesigram Area Measurement: Application of a Statistically Calculated Ellipse , 1985 .

[3]  J. Marshall THE SKIN SENSES , 1969 .

[4]  Y. Brenière Why we walk the way we do. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  G. Somjen,et al.  FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CELL SIZE IN SPINAL MOTONEURONS. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  P Rougier,et al.  Optimising the visual feedback technique for improving upright stance maintenance by delaying its display: behavioural effects on healthy adults. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[7]  P Rougier,et al.  A comparative analysis of the center of gravity and center of pressure trajectory path lengths in standing posture: an estimation of active stiffness. , 2000, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[8]  P. Rougier Influence of visual feedback on successive control mechanisms in upright quiet stance in humans assessed by fractional Brownian motion modelling , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  P Rougier,et al.  Automatic determination of the transition between successive control mechanisms in upright stance assessed by modelling of the centre of pressure. , 1999, Archives of physiology and biochemistry.

[10]  V. Dietz,et al.  A basic posture control mechanism: the stabilization of the centre of gravity. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  P. Rougier,et al.  Center of Gravity Motions and Ankle Joint Stiffness Control in Upright Undisturbed Stance Modeled Through a Fractional Brownian Motion Framework , 2000, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  J. Collins,et al.  Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: A random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  P. Rougier,et al.  Backward and forward leaning postures modelled by an fBm framework , 2001, Neuroscience Research.

[14]  P Rougier,et al.  Modifying the gain of the visual feedback affects undisturbed upright stance control. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractional Brownian Motions, Fractional Noises and Applications , 1968 .

[16]  D. Winter,et al.  Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  P. Rougier,et al.  The influence of having the eyelids open or closed on undisturbed postural control , 2003, Neuroscience Research.

[18]  P. Rougier,et al.  Adaptative effects of loss of vision on upright undisturbed stance , 2000, Brain Research.

[19]  S Weinstein,et al.  Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex, and laterality , 1968 .

[20]  Patrice Rougier,et al.  Visual feedback induces opposite effects on elementary centre of gravity and centre of pressure minus centre of gravity motions in undisturbed upright stance. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  Y Brenière,et al.  Are dynamic phenomena prior to stepping essential to walking? , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  Y Brenière,et al.  Estimating the centre of gravity of the body on the basis of the centre of pressure in standing posture. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.