Comparison of Frameless Stereotactic Systems: Accuracy, Precision, and Applications

OBJECTIVE Frameless stereotactic systems have become an integral part of neurosurgical practice. At our center, we recently introduced for clinical use a small, portable, frameless stereotactic system, namely the Cygnus PFS system (Compass International, Rochester, MN). The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the Cygnus PFS system with that of two larger systems that are also currently in use at our institution, i.e., the SMN system (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and the ISG viewing wand (ISG Technologies, Toronto, Canada). These systems represent three kinds of frameless stereotactic technologies that are commercially available. Each system uses a different method of spatial localization, i.e., mechanical linkage (ISG system), magnetic field digitization (Cygnus system), or optical technology (SMN system). METHODS Using a stereotactic “phantom,” we measured the accuracies of all three systems with identical data sets. The errors in localization in three-dimensional space for nine targets were calculated by using 10 magnetic resonance imaging data sets. The precision of each system was also calculated. RESULTS With this experimental protocol, the Cygnus system attained a mean accuracy of 1.90 ± 0.7 mm, the ISG viewing wand system a mean accuracy of 1.67 ± 0.43 mm, and the SMN microscope a mean accuracy of 2.61 ± 0.99 mm. The precision values were not significantly different among the systems. CONCLUSION We observed only small differences in accuracy and precision among these three systems. We briefly review the advantages and disadvantages of each system and note that other factors, such as portability, ease of use, and microscope integration, should influence the selection of a frameless stereotactic system.

[1]  M. Y. Wang,et al.  Measurement of Intraoperative Brain Surface Deformation Under a Craniotomy , 1998, MICCAI.

[2]  David M.D. Roberts,et al.  Image-Guided Neurosurgery: Clinical Applications of Surgical Navigation , 1998 .

[3]  C. Matula,et al.  Frameless stereotactic lesion contour-guided surgery using a computer-navigated microscope. , 1998, Surgical neurology.

[4]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Frameless stereotaxy with real-time tracking of patient head movement and retrospective patient-image registration. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  B. Dawant,et al.  Effect of geometrical distortion correction in MR on image registration accuracy. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  S J Zinreich,et al.  In vivo accuracy testing and clinical experience with the ISG Viewing Wand. , 1996, Neurosurgery.

[7]  R. Young,et al.  Accuracy of stereotaxis. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  I. Pollack,et al.  The role of frameless stereotactic techniques in the treatment of pediatric CNS lesions. , 1995, Pediatric neurology.

[9]  L. Smith,et al.  Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: results of 325 cases. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  K. Ea.  Venous disease and tumors. , 1995 .

[11]  R. Maciunas,et al.  The application accuracy of stereotactic frames. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[12]  H F Reinhardt,et al.  Micro-stereometry: a frameless computerized navigating system for open microsurgery. , 1994, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[13]  A M Kadi,et al.  Interactive intraoperative localization using an infrared-based system. , 1993, Neurological research.

[14]  G H Barnett,et al.  Intraoperative localization using an armless, frameless stereotactic wand. Technical note. , 1993, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  F. Beer,et al.  Tumor Stereotaxis, Patrick J. Kelly (Ed.). W.B. Saunders Company (1991), 0 72 165360 , 1991 .

[16]  P J Kelly,et al.  Stereotactic surgery: what is past is prologue. , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[17]  C. Mascott.  The Cygnus PFS image-guided system. , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[18]  P. Helm,et al.  Accuracy of registration methods in frameless stereotaxis. , 1998, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[19]  M S Eljamel,et al.  Accuracy, efficacy, and clinical applications of the Radionics Operating Arm System. , 1997, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[20]  L. Zamorano,et al.  Application accuracy study of a semipermanent fiducial system for frameless stereotaxis. , 1997, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[21]  J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  A universal method for geometric correction of magnetic resonance images for stereotactic neurosurgery. , 1996, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[22]  E. Knopp.  Venous disease and tumors. , 1995, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[23]  B A Kall,et al.  Three-dimensional display in the evaluation and performance of neurosurgery without a stereotactic frame: more than a pretty picture? , 1994, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[24]  P. Kelly,et al.  A stereotactic magnetic field digitizer. , 1994, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[25]  M P Heilbrun,et al.  Three-point transformation for integration of multiple coordinate systems: applications to tumor, functional, and fractionated radiosurgery stereotactic planning. , 1994, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[26]  T Takizawa,et al.  Isocentric stereotactic three-dimensional digitizer for neurosurgery. , 1993, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[27]  L. Lemieux,et al.  Accuracy in frame-based and frameless stereotaxy. , 1993, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[28]  A Hartov,et al.  Further development and clinical application of the stereotactic operating microscope. , 1992, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[29]  E Plante,et al.  Sources of error in the quantitative analysis of MRI scans. , 1991, Magnetic resonance imaging.