FLT-PET At 6 Weeks Predicts Response Assessed by CT at 12 Weeks in Melanoma Patients Treated With Pembrolizumab.

PURPOSE Investigate the ability of F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET combined with CT at 6 weeks to predict treatment response at 12 weeks after treatment with pembrolizumab. METHODS Five patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma were included in this single-institution pilot study. Patients underwent FLT-PET/CT (baseline and 6 weeks) and CT (baseline and 12 weeks). FLT-PET/CT response and CT response were assessed using PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors and immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, respectively. Patients were categorized as responders (complete response, partial response) and nonresponders (stable disease, progressive disease). Agreement between 6-week FLT-PET/CT and 12-week CT was calculated using Cohen kappa's agreement. Eight baseline FLT-PET/CT parameters were extracted: SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVSD, SUVmean, proliferative tumor volume, total lesion proliferation, bone marrow-to-liver SUVmax ratio, and spleen-to-liver SUVmax ratio. Eight delta-parameters were extracted at 6 weeks by calculating variation in FLT uptake as percentage change from baseline. RESULTS Agreement between 6-week FLT-PET/CT and 12-week CT was kappa = 0.615, P = 0.025. Three of 5 patients were categorized as responders on CT by immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. At baseline, responders had a lower mean proliferative tumor volume and a higher bone marrow-to-liver SUVmax ratio. At 6 weeks, responders demonstrated a decrease in tumor volume and tumor proliferation. CONCLUSIONS Our study illustrates the potential for FLT-PET/CT as an early predictor of response for patients with metastatic melanoma on anti-PD1 immunotherapy. Larger studies are indicated to confirm these findings.

[1]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Prognostic and theranostic 18F-FDG PET biomarkers for anti-PD1 immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: association with outcome and transcriptomics , 2019, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  R. Houot,et al.  Kinetics and nadir of responses to immune checkpoint blockade by anti-PD1 in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2018, European journal of cancer.

[3]  J. Mountz,et al.  Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy Response Assessment with F-18 Fluorothymidine Positron-Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Melanoma Brain Metastasis: A Pilot Study , 2018, Front. Oncol..

[4]  Lawrence H. Schwartz,et al.  (18)F-FDG PET and CT-scan Detect New Imaging Patterns of Response and Progression in Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated by Anti-PD1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor , 2018 .

[5]  T. Chan,et al.  Tumor and Microenvironment Evolution during Immunotherapy with Nivolumab , 2017, Cell.

[6]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Vemurafenib plus cobimetinib in unresectable stage IIIc or stage IV melanoma: response monitoring and resistance prediction with positron emission tomography and tumor characteristics (REPOSIT): study protocol of a phase II, open-label, multicenter study , 2017, BMC Cancer.

[7]  R. Wahl,et al.  A comparison of FLT to FDG PET/CT in the early assessment of chemotherapy response in stages IB–IIIA resectable NSCLC , 2017, EJNMMI Research.

[8]  Shi Qi,et al.  18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Predicting Response to Chemoradiotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Preliminary Results , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Charles Ferté,et al.  Hyperprogressive Disease Is a New Pattern of Progression in Cancer Patients Treated by Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  M. Burotto,et al.  Pseudoprogression and Immune-Related Response in Solid Tumors. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  April M. Kloxin,et al.  Metastatic melanoma - a review of current and future treatment options. , 2015, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[12]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Cancer immunotherapy: imaging assessment of novel treatment response patterns and immune-related adverse events. , 2015, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[13]  Bal Sanghera,et al.  FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response , 2014, Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India.

[14]  Markus Schwaiger,et al.  FLT-PET is superior to FDG-PET for very early response prediction in NPM-ALK-positive lymphoma treated with targeted therapy. , 2012, Cancer research.

[15]  W. Oyen,et al.  Early identification of antigen-specific immune responses in vivo by [18F]-labeled 3′-fluoro-3′-deoxy-thymidine ([18F]FLT) PET imaging , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Y. Kiniwa [Immunotherapy for melanoma]. , 2010, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[17]  A. Ribas,et al.  Imaging of CTLA4 Blockade–Induced Cell Replication with 18F-FLT PET in Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Tremelimumab , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  R. Wahl,et al.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  A. Hoffbrand,et al.  Alternative metabolic fates of thymine nucleotides in human cells. , 1981, The Biochemical journal.

[20]  R. Rocklin Modulation of cellular-immune responses in vivo and in vitro by histamine receptor-bearing lymphocytes. , 1976, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[21]  A. Shinomiya,et al.  Evaluation of 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) kinetics correlated with thymidine kinase-1 expression and cell proliferation in newly diagnosed gliomas , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[22]  J. Wolchok,et al.  The heterogeneity of the kinetics of response to ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma: patient cases. , 2008, Cancer immunity.