Do Augmentative and Alternative Communication Interventions Really Make a Difference?: The Challenges of Efficacy Research

The empirical evidence to support the efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interventions is still quite limited. Further efficacy research is urgently needed to establish best practices, maximize outcomes, ensure accountability, and justify cost. However, conducting efficacy research in the AAC field poses significant challenges because of the heterogeneity of the population of AAC users, the complexity of AAC systems and interventions, and the intricacies of the communication process. This paper discusses some of the challenges confronted when conducting AAC efficacy research—challenges in defining meaningful research questions, determining appropriate methods to investigate these questions, and analyzing the results or outcomes of efficacy research. Some potential solutions to these challenges are discussed and illustrated using examples from current efficacy research on AAC interventions to build communicative competence.

[1]  David McNaughton,et al.  Effect of repeated listening experiences on the intelligibility of synthesized speech , 1994 .

[2]  Janice Light,et al.  “Communication is the essence of human life”: reflections on communicative competence , 1997 .

[3]  J. Bedrosian.  Efficacy research issues in AAC: interactive storybook reading , 1999 .

[4]  Clinical Research in Communicative Disorders: Principles and Strategies , 1987 .

[5]  M. Rapport,et al.  Attention deficit disorder and methylphenidate: a multilevel analysis of dose-response effects on children's impulsivity across settings. , 1988, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[6]  David Crystal,et al.  ISAAC in Chains: The Future of Communication Systems , 1986 .

[7]  J Light,et al.  Instructing facilitators to support the communication of people who use augmentative communication systems. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  D. Bowler.  Need for theory in studies of augmentative and alternative communication , 1991 .

[9]  Stephen N. Calculator,et al.  AAC outcomes for children and youths with severe disabilities: when seeing is believing , 1999 .

[10]  D. Bogen,et al.  Computers, assistive devices, and augmentative communication aids: Technology for social inclusion , 1995 .

[11]  M. Granlund,et al.  Inservice training in collaborative problem solving and goal setting for special education teacher consultants working with profoundly impaired persons , 1992 .

[12]  D. Biklen,et al.  Communication Unbound: Autism and Praxis , 1990 .

[13]  Janice Light,et al.  Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems , 1989 .

[14]  Leija V. McReynolds,et al.  Flexibility of Single-Subject Experimental Designs. Part III , 1986 .

[15]  M. Hersen.  Single case experimental designs , 1992 .

[16]  G. Soto.  Teaching Specific Requests: A Comparative Analysis on Skill Acquisition and Preference Using Two Augmentative and Alternative Communication Aids. , 1993 .

[17]  G. Karlan,et al.  Case studies: Why and how , 1990 .

[18]  Janice Light,et al.  Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary c , 1985 .

[19]  David McNaughton,et al.  Comparison of two spelling instruction techniques for adults who use augmentative and alternative communication , 1993 .

[20]  Robert F. Orlikoff,et al.  Evaluating Research in Communicative Disorders , 1996 .

[21]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Assessing the Clinical or Applied Importance of Behavior Change through Social Validation , 1977 .

[22]  K P Kearns,et al.  Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part II: Design selection and arrangement of experimental phases. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[23]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials , 1982 .

[24]  Janice Light,et al.  Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions , 1988 .

[25]  G. Āllport.  The general and the unique in psychological science. , 1962, Journal of personality.

[26]  C. Binger,et al.  Teaching partner-focused questions to individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication to enhance their communicative competence. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[27]  Jeff Sigafoos,et al.  Initial comparison of the efficiency of a variety of AAC systems for ordering meals in fast food restaurants , 1991 .

[28]  Janice C Light,et al.  Message-encoding techniques for augmentative communication systems: the recall performances of adults with severe speech impairments. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.