The A3 pulley.

The tendon-pulley geometry and gliding resistance with and without the A3 pulley were compared in 6 fresh human cadaver fingers. We measured the x-ray images of the distal A2 pulley-tendon angle and proximal A4 pulley-tendon angle with varying degrees of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion between 0 degrees and 120 degrees before and after A3 pulley resection. The gliding resistance of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon under the A2 pulley was also measured at varying tendon-pulley angles. With the A3 pulley removed, the tendon-pulley angle significantly increased compared with the A3 intact state. The gliding resistance between tendon and pulley quadratically increased as the tendon-pulley angle increase from 0 degrees to 60 degrees. These results indicate that the A3 pulley might serve to reduce tendon-pulley gliding resistance by reducing the tendon-pulley angle during finger flexion.

[1]  E Y Chao,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of finger flexor pulley reconstruction. , 1989, Journal of hand surgery.

[2]  L J Berglund,et al.  Flexor tendon-pulley interaction after tendon repair. A biomechanical study. , 1995, Journal of hand surgery.

[3]  D. Mass,et al.  A biomechanical study of the flexor digitorum superficialis: effects of digital pulley excision and loss of the flexor digitorum profundus. , 1997, The Journal of hand surgery.

[4]  A Karev,et al.  The mechanical efficiency of the pulley system in normal digits compared with a reconstructed system using the "belt loop" technique. , 1987, The Journal of hand surgery.

[5]  K. An,et al.  Functional anatomy of the human digital flexor pulley system. , 1989, The Journal of hand surgery.

[6]  A. Amis,et al.  The interior of the flexor tendon sheath of the finger. The functional significance of its structure. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  K. An,et al.  Reconstruction of the Flexor Pulley. The Effect of the Tension and Source of the Graft in an in Vitro Dog Model* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  M. Aoki,et al.  Work of Flexion after Tendon Repair with Various Suture Methods , 1995, Journal of hand surgery.

[9]  J. R. Doyle.  Anatomy of the flexor tendon sheath and pulley system: a current review. , 1989, The Journal of hand surgery.

[10]  D Mass,et al.  Efficiency of the flexor tendon pulley system in human cadaver hands. , 1996, The Journal of hand surgery.

[11]  C Phillips,et al.  Mechanical analysis of the palmar aponeurosis pulley in human cadavers. , 1996, The Journal of hand surgery.

[12]  L Berglund,et al.  Measurement of friction between pulley and flexor tendon. , 1993, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[13]  J R Doyle,et al.  Anatomy of the finger flexor tendon sheath and pulley system. , 1988, The Journal of hand surgery.

[14]  Barton Nj,et al.  Experimental study of optimal location of flexor tendon pulleys. , 1969 .

[15]  A New Type of Flexor Tendon Repair , 1995, Journal of hand surgery.

[16]  J. S. Watson,et al.  A Comparative Study of Two Methods of Controlled Mobilization of Flexor Tendon Repairs in Zone 2 , 1998, Journal of hand surgery.

[17]  P C Amadio,et al.  Method for the measurement of friction between tendon and pulley , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  J. Tang,et al.  Flexor Tendon Repair in Zone 2C , 1994, Journal of hand surgery.

[19]  P. Manske,et al.  Effect of pulley excision on flexor tendon biomechanics , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[20]  K. An,et al.  Anatomy and pathomechanics of the flexor pulley system , 1989 .