STEM learning through engineering design: fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace

BackgroundInternationally, there is a growing concern for developing STEM education to prepare students for a scientifically and technologically advanced society. Despite educational bodies lobbying for an increased focus on STEM, there is limited research on how engineering might be incorporated especially in the elementary school curriculum. A framework of five comprehensive core engineering design processes (problem scoping, idea generation, design and construction, design evaluation, redesign), adapted from the literature on design thinking in young children, served as a basis for the study. We report on a qualitative study of fourth-grade students’ developments in working an aerospace problem, which took place during the first year of a 3-year longitudinal study. Students applied design processes together with their mathematics and science knowledge to the design and redesign of a 3-D model plane.ResultsThe study shows that through an aerospace engineering problem, students could complete initial designs and redesigns of a model plane at varying levels of sophistication. Three levels of increasing sophistication in students’ sketches were identified in their designs and redesigns. The second level was the most prevalent involving drawings or templates of planes together with an indication of how to fold the materials as well as measurements linked to the plane’s construction. The third level incorporated written instructions and calculations. Students’ engagement with each of the framework’s design processes revealed problem scoping components in their initial designs and redesigns. Furthermore, students’ recommendations for improving their launching techniques revealed an ability to apply their mathematics knowledge in conjunction with their science learning on the forces of flight. Students’ addition of context was evident together with an awareness of constraints and a consideration of what was feasible in their design creation. Interestingly, students’ application of disciplinary knowledge occurred more frequently in the last two phases of the engineering framework (i.e., design evaluation and redesign), highlighting the need for students to reach these final phases to enable the science and mathematics ideas to emerge.ConclusionsThe study supports research indicating young learners’ potential for early engineering. Students can engage in design and redesign processes, applying their STEM disciplinary knowledge in doing so. An appropriate balance is needed between teacher input of new concepts and students’ application of this learning in ways they choose. For example, scaffolding by the teacher about how to improve designs for increased detail could be included in subsequent experiences. Such input could enhance students’ application of STEM disciplinary knowledge in the redesign process. We offer our framework of design processes for younger learners as one way to approach early engineering education with respect to both the creation of rich problem experiences and the analysis of their learning.

[1]  Christine M. Cunningham,et al.  DESIGNING ENGINEERING EXPERIENCES TO ENGAGE ALL STUDENTS , 2014 .

[2]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[3]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Explanations in Gesture, Diagram, and Word , 2009, Spatial Language and Dialogue.

[4]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Insights on Designers’ Sketching Activities in New Product Design Teams , 2004 .

[5]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Model-Eliciting Activities for Engineering Education , 2008 .

[6]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Information Gathering: A Critical Step for Quality in the Design Process , 1997 .

[7]  Theodore Lewis,et al.  Coming to Terms with Engineering Design as Content , 2005 .

[8]  Aran W. Glancy,et al.  A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education: Research and Development , 2014 .

[9]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[10]  W. Dugger Standards for Technological Literacy. Content for the Study of Technology. , 2000 .

[11]  Robin Adams,et al.  The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix , 2012 .

[12]  Christine M. Cunningham,et al.  Engineering is Elementary: An Evaluation of Year 6 Field Testing , 2011 .

[13]  Matthew M. Mehalik,et al.  Middle‐School Science Through Design‐Based Learning versus Scripted Inquiry: Better Overall Science Concept Learning and Equity Gap Reduction , 2008 .

[14]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators , 2006 .

[15]  Marilyn Fleer,et al.  Working Technologically: Investigations into How Young Children Design and Make During Technology Education , 2000 .

[16]  David Hammer,et al.  Examining Young Students' Problem Scoping in Engineering Design. , 2014 .

[17]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Designers : the key to successful product development , 1998 .

[18]  Robert D. Atkinson,et al.  Refueling the U.S. Innovation Economy: Fresh Approaches to STEM Education , 2010 .

[19]  Merredith D. Portsmore,et al.  Exploring how experience with planning impacts first grade students' planning and solutions to engineering design problems , 2010 .

[20]  Monica E. Cardella,et al.  Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices , 2014 .

[21]  Donna Diaz,et al.  AC 2007-3069: ADAPTING A POST-SECONDARY STEM INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL TO K-5 MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION , 2007 .

[22]  Leema K. Berland,et al.  Designing for STEM Integration , 2013 .

[23]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  From “wiggly structures” to “unshaky towers”: problem framing, solution finding, and negotiation of courses of actions during a civil engineering unit for elementary students , 1995 .

[24]  Gina Navoa Svarovsky,et al.  Capturing the Design Thinking of Young Children Interacting with a Parent , 2014 .

[25]  Brenda J. Gustafson,et al.  The Role of Design Drawing among Children Engaged in a Parachute Building Activity. , 2004 .

[26]  Tamara J. Moore,et al.  Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education , 2012 .

[27]  David R. Meyer,et al.  The design process , 1978 .

[28]  John W. Hansen,et al.  Lessons from Star Trek: Examining the Social Values Embedded in Technological Programs. , 2000 .

[29]  Tony Wright,et al.  Science in the middle years: Building a model for the integrated curriculum , 2006 .

[30]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Design Heuristics in Engineering Concept Generation , 2012 .

[31]  Christine Cunningham,et al.  AC 2007-8: ENGINEERING IS ELEMENTARY: AN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY CURRICULUM FOR CHILDREN , 2007 .

[32]  Demetra Evangelou,et al.  Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: the teacher's experience , 2015 .

[33]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Thinking with Sketches , 2009 .

[34]  Martha W. Alibali,et al.  BRIDGES AND BARRIERS TO CONSTRUCTING CONCEPTUAL COHESION ACROSS MODALITIES AND TEMPORALITIES:: CHALLENGES OF STEM INTEGRATION IN THE PRE-COLLEGE ENGINEERING CLASSROOM , 2014 .

[35]  Robin Adams,et al.  An exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with scientific explanations , 2015, International Journal of STEM Education.

[36]  Christine M. Cunningham,et al.  ENGINEERING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS , 2014 .

[37]  John Orr,et al.  Curriculum Development And Integration For K 6 Engineering Education , 2007 .

[38]  John Woods,et al.  Meteorology meets engineering: an interdisciplinary STEM module for middle and early secondary school students , 2014 .

[39]  Karen M. Bursic,et al.  Verbal Protocol Analysis as a Method to Document Engineering Student Design Processes , 1998 .

[40]  Richard Lesh,et al.  A Modeling Perspective on Learning and Teaching in Engineering Education , 2008 .

[41]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research , 2014 .

[42]  David A. Gillam,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .

[43]  Luis Moreno-Armella,et al.  Intersecting representation and communication infrastructures , 2009 .

[44]  L. Katehi,et al.  Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. , 2009 .

[45]  Melanie Birks,et al.  Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide , 2011, QMiP Bulletin.

[46]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Iterative Refinement Cycles for Videotape Analyses of Conceptual Change , 2000 .

[47]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners , 2007 .

[48]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[49]  Ngss Lead States Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[50]  Heejun Lim,et al.  The Strategic Thinking of Novice Designers: Discontinuity between Theory and Practice. , 2000 .

[51]  Lyn D. English,et al.  STEM: Challenges and opportunities for mathematics education , 2015 .

[52]  Monica E. Cardella,et al.  Engineering in Pre-College Settings , 2014 .

[53]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[54]  Judith S. Zawojewski,et al.  Models and Modeling in Engineering Education: Designing Experiences for All Students , 2008 .

[55]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[56]  David D. Kumar,et al.  The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Stand for Teacher Education. , 2007 .

[57]  Helen Meyer,et al.  Mathematics and Science Integration: Models and Characterizations , 2009 .

[58]  Angela Anning,et al.  Drawing Out Ideas: Graphicacy and Young Children , 1997 .

[59]  Jay B. Labov,et al.  STEM Learning Is Everywhere: Summary of a Convocation on Building Learning Systems , 2014 .

[60]  Aran W. Glancy,et al.  Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education , 2014 .

[61]  Ioannis N. Miaoulis,et al.  K-12 Engineering - the Missing Core Discipline , 2010 .

[62]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Engineering based problem solving in the middle school: Design and construction with simple machines , 2013 .

[63]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Reconceptualizing Statistical Learning in the Early Years , 2013 .

[64]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Curricula integration : identifying and locating engineering education across the Australian curriculum , 2014 .