Impact properties of floor coverings and their role during simulated hip fractures

Abstract Fractures of the hip are common among the elderly and preventative measures should be taken to reduce the risk. Hip protectors are a cost-effective solution and can be used successfully to reduce the likelihood of hip fracture. Unfortunately, they suffer from low patient compliance because they are uncomfortable to wear and require co-operation from the patient to wear them consistently. An alternative solution is to place a protective layer on the other impacting surface, which is the floor. This avoids the problem of patient compliance and ensures protection. Little research has been concerned with the role of floor coverings in an impact. A mechanical test rig has been designed and built to simulate a person falling onto floor coverings with sufficient impact energy to fracture the proximal femur if unprotected. Forces are measured using a piezoelectric load cell that is positioned under a pin to represent the greater trochanter. Both the time and frequency domain data have been analysed for each impact. Carpet and vinyl floor coverings have been tested with various underlay materials. The new underlay materials have been compared with typical carpet underlay. Results highlight the important energy absorption role that floor coverings have during impacts on the hip. In conclusion, it is suggested that it would be cost-effective to install energy absorbing flooring in areas where there is high risk of fall-induced injuries.

[1]  W C Hayes,et al.  Force attenuation in trochanteric soft tissues during impact from a fall , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  O Chadwick Airway and ventilator management. , 1983, Emergency medicine clinics of North America.

[3]  J. Lauritzen,et al.  Hip fractures: incidence, risk factors, energy absorption, and prevention. , 1996, Bone.

[4]  V. Askegaard,et al.  Protection against hip fractures by energy absorption. , 1992, Danish medical bulletin.

[5]  C. Cooper,et al.  Hip fractures in the elderly: A world-wide projection , 1992, Osteoporosis International.

[6]  J Kenwright,et al.  Measurement of impact force, simulation of fall and hip fracture. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  Westgate Road,et al.  The Design and Analysis of a New Trochanteric Hip Protector for the Elderly , 2004 .

[8]  S. Cummings,et al.  A hypothesis: the causes of hip fractures. , 1989, Journal of gerontology.

[9]  D A Streit,et al.  The Penn State Safety Floor: Part I--Design parameters associated with walking deflections. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  M. M. Petersen,et al.  Effect of external hip protectors on hip fractures , 1993, The Lancet.

[11]  P Kannus,et al.  Comparison of force attenuation properties of four different hip protectors under simulated falling conditions in the elderly: an in vitro biomechanical study. , 1999, Bone.

[12]  J W Runge,et al.  The cost of injury. , 1993, Emergency medicine clinics of North America.

[13]  Farhad Nabhani,et al.  Mechanical testing of hip protectors , 2002 .

[14]  S. Shinkai,et al.  [Compliance in use of external protectors for hip fractures among the community elderly in Japan]. , 1999, Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi. Japanese journal of geriatrics.

[15]  W C Hayes,et al.  Energy-shunting hip padding system attenuates femoral impact force in a simulated fall. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  D A Streit,et al.  The Penn State Safety Floor: Part II--Reduction of fall-related peak impact forces on the femur. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  W C Hayes,et al.  Prediction of femoral impact forces in falls on the hip. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  M. Parker,et al.  Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. , 1993, BMJ.