The International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation

Background. Since May 2002, all groups performing hand transplantations have supplied information to the International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation (IRHCCT). The analysis of all cases with follow-up information up to September 2007 is presented here. Methods. From September 1998 to September 2007, 38 hands (18 unilateral and 10 bilateral hand transplantations) and two digits have been reported to IRHCTT, for a total of 30 patients with a follow-up period ranging from 6 months to 9 years. They were 28 males and two females, median age of 34 years. Time since hand loss ranged from 2 months to 34 years and in 50% of cases the level of amputation was at wrist level. Immunosuppressive therapy included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, rapamycin, and steroids; polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies were used for induction. Topical immunosuppression was also employed in several cases. Results. Patient survival was 100%. Graft survival was 100% at 1 and 2 years. Except for the Chinese patients, current graft survival is 95.6% and cause of graft loss was always no compliance to the treatment. Acute rejection episodes occurred in 85% of the patients within the first year and they were reversible in all compliant patients. Side-effects included opportunistic infections and metabolic complications. All patients developed protective sensibility, 90% of them developed tactile sensibility, and 72% also a discriminative sensibility. Motor recovery enabled patients to perform most daily activities. Conclusions. Hand transplantation is feasible with a high success rate and satisfactory functional outcome.

[1]  F. Schuind,et al.  The International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation , 2010, Transplantation.

[2]  F. Schuind,et al.  Atypical Acute Rejection After Hand Transplantation , 2008, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[3]  F. Schuind,et al.  Second report (1998-2006) of the International Registry of Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation. , 2007, Transplant immunology.

[4]  F. Baldanti,et al.  Cytomegalovirus-Related Complications in Human Hand Transplantation , 2005, Transplantation.

[5]  Marco Lanzetta,et al.  Pathological score for the evaluation of allograft rejection in human hand (composite tissue) allotransplantation. , 2005, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[6]  C. Ekdahl,et al.  The quality of reporting and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials related to upper-extremity disorders. , 2004, The Journal of hand surgery.

[7]  Jean Kanitakis,et al.  Clinicopathologic features of graft rejection of the first human hand allograft , 2003, Transplantation.

[8]  Marco Lanzetta,et al.  Functional Results of the First Human Double-Hand Transplantation , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[9]  C. Ekdahl,et al.  The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery , 2003, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[10]  E. Nordh,et al.  SENSORY RECOVERY AFTER HAND REIMPLANTATION: A CLINICAL, MORPHOLOGICAL, AND NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDY IN HUMANS , 2003, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[11]  R. Margreiter,et al.  A double-hand transplant can be worth the effort! , 2002, Transplantation.

[12]  J. Dubernard,et al.  Hand Transplantation: Ethics, Immunosuppression and Indications , 2001, Journal of hand surgery.

[13]  Pascal Giraux,et al.  Cortical reorganization in motor cortex after graft of both hands , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  G. Pei,et al.  [A preliminary report of two cases of human hand allograft]. , 2000, Zhonghua yi xue za zhi.

[15]  M. Lanzettà,et al.  Human hand allograft: report on first 6 months , 1999, The Lancet.

[16]  J. Yew,et al.  The immunosuppressant FK506 increases GAP-43 mRNA levels in axotomized sensory neurons , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  E. Fess,et al.  Evaluation of impairment of the upper extremity. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  S. Tamai Twenty years' experience of limb replantation--review of 293 upper extremity replants. , 1985, The Journal of hand surgery.

[19]  R. Beasley,et al.  Present indications and contraindications for replantation as reflected by long-term functional results. , 1981, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[20]  A. Dellon SQUAMOUS CARCINOMA ARISING IN AN ARTIFICIAL VAGINA , 1974 .

[21]  M. Edgerton,et al.  REEDUCATION OF SENSATION IN THE HAND AFTER NERVE INJURY AND REPAIR , 1974, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  P. Petruzzo,et al.  A Comprehensive Functional Score System in Hand Transplantation , 2007 .

[23]  W P Cooney,et al.  Successful hand transplantation--one year follow-up. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  J. Dubernard,et al.  Hand transplantation: Comparisons and observations of the first four clinical cases , 2000, Microsurgery.

[25]  T. Barfred,et al.  Principles of evaluation and results in microsurgical treatment of major limb amputations. A follow-up study of 26 consecutive cases 1978-1987. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[26]  D. Barclay,et al.  One-year follow-up , 1975 .