CFD Predictions of Jet Engine Exhaust Plumes

Laser beam propagation in severe environment such as a jet engine exhaust may influence performance of e.g. laser countermeasures and active imaging systems located on airborne platforms. Beam propagation in close vicinity to the engine plume causes performance degradation due to beam wander and beam broadening effects. In this study, aero-optical effects, as well as conventional fluid dynamical issues, are computationally examined using Large Eddy Simulations (LES) in round and square shaped co-annular jets having the same cross-sectional nozzle area. The target configuration for these LES computations is a downscaled jet engine, operated by Volvo Aero, providing a characteristic exhaust in comparison to a full-scale engine. The LES model is separately validated against velocity and temperature data from the Seiner experiments before being employed to compute the target engine configuration. The computed results are used to elucidate the fluid dynamics in a supersonic jet plume, and to help in further understand the complicated aero-optical processes in the engine plume. In particular, we estimate the refractive index and structure parameter that in turn can be used to estimate the beam wander, distortion and broadening. Laser beam propagation through adverse turbulent regions, such as the environment close to a jet engine exhaust, needs to be studied in order to understand the mechanisms affecting the performance of airborne laser systems. During recent years, development of several laser systems aimed primarily at airborne applications has attracted interest. In security applications, Directed Infra-Red Counter-Measures (DIRCM) are now being developed to protect civilian airliners from heat seeking missile threats that potentially could be used by terrorists. DIRCM systems operate by directing modulated laser irradiation towards the missile seeker causing the optical sensor within the seeker to be jammed or decoyed, hence prohibiting target tracking. As a result of a successful jamming, the missile will break-lock and miss the intended target. Other airborne laser systems include e.g. active imaging and free-space optical communication. There are several sources that may perturb the emitted laser radiation such as, atmospheric turbulence, structural vibrations, aero-optical effects and jet engine exhaust plumes. In this study, the effects of the jet engine exhaust are emphasized using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) together with supporting experimental measurement data. The jet engine exhaust plume is turbulent, and may therefore introduce severe aero-optic perturbations that accumulate and cause laser beam degradation in terms of beam wander, intensity scintillations and beam broadening at long range. By characterizing and evaluating perturbations, schemes for compensation or evasion of performance degradation can be devised. Jet engine exhaust plumes, figure 1, are complicated in nature as being created by the combustion process in the combustion chamber and being affected by the turbine, afterburner and nozzle. The engine processes are unsteady and sometimes affected by combustion instabilities, whereas the flow in the nozzle sometimes experience intermittent separation close to the walls. These jet engine plumes are supersonic, hot and with nozzle orifice pressures either just above or below the ambient pressure. The pressure mismatch causes the jet boundary to oscillate as it attempts to match the ambient pressure, and since the sound waves, by which information is transferred across the jet, travel slower than the supersonic flow, the jet repeatedly overshoots its equilibrium position. The sound waves converge to develop a network of shock diamonds that alternate with rarefaction fans. The gas in the jet interior expands and cools off as it flows

[1]  F. Nicoud,et al.  Subgrid-Scale Stress Modelling Based on the Square of the Velocity Gradient Tensor , 1999 .

[2]  A. D. Gosman,et al.  Large Eddy Simulations of the Flow Around a Square Prism , 2000 .

[3]  Lars Sjöqvist,et al.  Experimental study of mid-IR laser beam wander close to a jet engine exhaust , 2006, SPIE Security + Defence.

[4]  Guoqiang Li,et al.  An experimental and computational study of a multi-swirl gas turbine combustor , 2007 .

[5]  Rickard Bensow,et al.  On the justification and extension of mixed models in LES , 2007 .

[6]  Christer Fureby,et al.  On LES and DES of Wall Bounded Flows , 2007 .

[7]  Fernando F. Grinstein On Integrating Numerical and Laboratory Turbulent Flow Experiments , 2006 .

[8]  J. L. Barrett,et al.  Laser beam propagation through strong turbulence , 1992 .

[9]  Fernando Grinstein,et al.  Coherent structure dynamics and transition to turbulence in rectangular jet systems , 1999 .

[10]  V. S. Sirazetdinov,et al.  Experimental study and numerical simulation of laser beams propagation through the turbulent aerojet. , 2008, Applied optics.

[11]  S. Pope PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows , 1985 .

[12]  B. Launder,et al.  Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc , 1974 .

[13]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , 1979 .

[14]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes , 1998, Math. Comput..

[15]  Christer Fureby,et al.  Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Compressible Turbulent Shear Flows , 2007 .

[16]  Franck Nicoud,et al.  An approach to wall modeling in large-eddy simulations , 2000 .

[17]  Sutanu Sarkar,et al.  Application of a Reynolds stress turbulence model to the compressible shear layer , 1990 .

[18]  Rickard Bensow,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of the Viscous Flow around a Submarine During Maneuver , 2007 .

[19]  James R. DeBonis,et al.  Navier–Stokes analysis methods for turbulent jet flows with application to aircraft exhaust nozzles , 2006 .

[20]  P. Sagaut Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows , 2001 .

[21]  Christopher L. Rumsey,et al.  Turbulence modeling effects on calculation of lobed nozzle flowfields , 2006 .

[22]  Magnus Berglund,et al.  LES of Injection-Driven Flow in a Nozzleless Rocket Motor: Inflow Turbulence Eects , 2005 .

[23]  Fernando F. Grinstein,et al.  ENTRAINMENT, AXIS SWITCHING, AND ASPECT-RATIO EFFECTS IN RECTANGULAR FREE JETS , 1997 .

[24]  Rickard Bensow,et al.  Numerical investigation of the flow over an axisymmetric hill using LES, DES, and RANS , 2006 .

[25]  T. H. van den Berg,et al.  Turbulent bubbly flow , 2004 .

[26]  P. Moin,et al.  A dynamic subgrid‐scale eddy viscosity model , 1990 .

[27]  J. Smagorinsky,et al.  GENERAL CIRCULATION EXPERIMENTS WITH THE PRIMITIVE EQUATIONS , 1963 .

[28]  R. A. Silverman,et al.  Wave Propagation in a Turbulent Medium , 1961 .

[29]  H. A. Stine,et al.  Light Diffusion Through High-speed Turbulent Boundary Layers , 1956 .

[30]  J. Lambert Computational Methods in Ordinary Differential Equations , 1973 .

[31]  U. Schumann Subgrid Scale Model for Finite Difference Simulations of Turbulent Flows in Plane Channels and Annuli , 1975 .

[32]  D. C. Leslie,et al.  Large eddy simulation - A predictive approach to turbulent flow computation , 1979 .

[33]  Charles G. Speziale,et al.  Second-Order Closure Models for Supersonic Turbulent Flows , 1991 .

[34]  Christer Fureby,et al.  Large eddy simulation of the flow around an inclined prolate spheroid , 2004 .

[35]  James Bridges,et al.  Flowfield Comparisons from Three Navier-Stokes Solvers for an Axisymmetric Separate Flow Jet , 2002 .

[36]  John M. Seiner,et al.  The effects of temperature on supersonic jet noise emission , 1992 .

[37]  D. Wilcox Turbulence modeling for CFD , 1993 .

[38]  J. Ferziger,et al.  Improved subgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulation , 1980 .

[39]  A. Gosman,et al.  A comparative study of subgrid scale models in homogeneous isotropic turbulence , 1997 .

[40]  Christer Fureby,et al.  LES of a Multi-burner Annular Gas Turbine Combustor , 2010 .

[41]  Markus Henriksson,et al.  Laser beam propagation in close vicinity to a down-scaled jet engine exhaust , 2004, SPIE Security + Defence.

[42]  Christer Fureby,et al.  Simulation of transition and turbulence decay in the Taylor–Green vortex , 2007 .

[43]  Christer Fureby,et al.  Comparison of Flamelet and Finite Rate Chemistry LES for Premixed Turbulent Combustion , 2007 .

[44]  C. Hogge,et al.  Laser beam probing of jet exhaust turbulence. , 1971, Applied optics.