Performance Comparison of Gaussian-Based Filters Using Information Measures

In many situations, solutions to nonlinear discrete-time filtering problems are available through approximations. Many of these solutions are based on approximating the posterior distributions of the states with Gaussian distributions. In this letter, we compare the performance of Gaussian-based filters including the extended Kalman filter, the unscented Kalman fitter, and the Gaussian particle filter. To that end, we measure the distance between the posteriors obtained by these filters and the one estimated by a sequential Monte Carlo (particle filtering) method. As a distance metric, we apply the Kullback-Leibler and x2 information measures. Through computer simulations, we rank the performance of the three filters.

[1]  G. Hendeby,et al.  Target Tracking Performance Evaluation - A General Software Environment for Filtering , 2007, 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[2]  G. Kitagawa A self-organizing state-space model , 1998 .

[3]  B. Anderson,et al.  Optimal Filtering , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[4]  Rudolph van der Merwe,et al.  The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symposium (Cat. No.00EX373).

[5]  Gustavo L. Gilardoni Accuracy of posterior approximations via χ2 and harmonic divergences , 2005 .

[6]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice , 2003 .

[7]  Petar M. Djuric,et al.  Gaussian particle filtering , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[8]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.