Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia.

PURPOSE To study the preoperative risk factors for night vision complaints (NVCs) after LASIK in a clinical setting. DESIGN Retrospective noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS Seven hundred ninety-five patients (1488 eyes) who underwent LASIK for myopia up to -9.75 diopters (D) (from January 1 to December 31, 1999). SETTING Private clinic. METHODS A complete preoperative examination was performed. Patients had bilateral LASIK surgery using the Nidek EC-5000 non-wavefront guided slit-scanning excimer laser and the Moria LSK One microkeratome. Patients were observed postoperatively for 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The reported NVCs for each eye were rated on a subjective scale based on functional visual comfort. Clinically important NVC odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. RESULTS Reports of NVCs decreased considerably from 25.6% at 1 month to 4.7% at 12 months postoperatively, at which time all patients reported similar NVCs in both eyes. Stratification of risk factors at 12 months postoperatively showed a 2.8-times increase in NVCs for initial myopia of >5 D, a 2.5-times increase for an optical zone of </=6.0 mm, and a 2.9-times increase for a postoperative spherical equivalent outside +/-0.5 D of emmetropia. The role of attempted spherical correction, age of the patient, and postoperative spherical equivalent had significant importance in logistic regression of the OR throughout the first postoperative year. In a stepwise logistic regression using 6- and 12-month data, attempted spherical correction and optical zone were the most predictive factors of NVCs (P<0.001). Pupil size at any month postoperatively was not statistically predictive of postoperative NVCs in any differential model involving it. CONCLUSIONS Attempted degree of spherical correction, age, optical zone, and postoperative spherical equivalent were major risk factors of NVCs throughout the first postoperative year, whereas pupil size was not. Future wavefront studies that characterize higher order aberrations might be helpful for understanding individual visual aberrations while predicting quality of vision.

[1]  F. Fitzke,et al.  Disturbances in night vision after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy , 1994, Eye.

[2]  Abnormal activation in the visual cortex after corneal refractive surgery for myopia: demonstration by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[3]  Karla Zadnik,et al.  Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[4]  G. Lafond Treatment of halos after photorefractive keratectomy. , 1997, Journal of refractive surgery.

[5]  M Kaemmerer,et al.  Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: early results in three eyes. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[6]  D. Gartry,et al.  Photorefractive keratectomy: A 6-year follow-up study , 1998 .

[7]  E. Sarver,et al.  Schematic eye models for simulation of patient visual performance. , 2001, Journal of refractive surgery.

[8]  Y. Payette,et al.  Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: a control-matched study. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[9]  R A Applegate,et al.  Effect of pupillary dilation on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy. , 1998, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  Predicting visual performance following excimer photorefractive keratectomy. , 1992, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[11]  R Navarro,et al.  Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  F. Fitzke,et al.  Halos--a problem for all myopes? A comparison between spectacles, contact lenses, and photorefractive keratectomy. , 1993, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[13]  M. Lawless,et al.  Comparison of 5-mm and 6-mm ablation zones in photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. , 1996, Journal of refractive surgery.

[14]  I-Jong Wang,et al.  Quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis: Influence of dioptric correction and pupil size on visual function , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[15]  S. Klyce,et al.  Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. , 1999, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  C J Koester,et al.  Optical zone diameters for photorefractive corneal surgery. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  T. Seiler,et al.  Increased higher‐order optical aberrations after laser refractive surgery: A problem of subclinical decentration , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[18]  J. Marshall,et al.  Effects of ablation diameter, depth, and edge contour on the outcome of photorefractive keratectomy. , 1996, Journal of refractive surgery.

[19]  Florian Pop,et al.  Embedding problems over large fields , 1996 .

[20]  M Pop,et al.  Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 2: survey of 690 patients. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[21]  D. Gartry,et al.  Photorefractive keratectomy with an argon fluoride excimer laser: a clinical study. , 1991, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[22]  Y. Payette,et al.  Results of bilateral photorefractive keratectomy. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[23]  H. Hamberg‐Nyström,et al.  Patient satisfaction following photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. , 1995, Journal of refractive surgery.

[24]  Enrique Hita,et al.  Changes in corneal asphericity after laser in situ keratomileusis , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[25]  E. Manche,et al.  Effect of preoperative pupil measurements on glare, halos, and visual function after photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[26]  I. Wang,et al.  Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. , 1996, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi.

[27]  T. Seiler,et al.  Effective spherical aberration of the cornea as a quantitative descriptor in corneal topography , 1993, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[28]  J. Marshall,et al.  Night Vision after Excimer Laser Photorefractive Keratectomy: Haze and Halos , 1994, European journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  S. Trokel,et al.  Enlargement of the photorefractive keratectomy optical zone , 1996, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[30]  Discrimination between the origins and functional implications of haze and halo at night after photorefractive keratectomy. , 1994, Journal of refractive and corneal surgery.

[31]  M. A. Danasoury Prospective bilateral study of night glare after laser in situ keratomileusis with single zone and transition zone ablation. , 1998 .

[32]  S. Barbero,et al.  Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurements. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[33]  S. Pieh,et al.  Glare and halo phenomena after laser in situ keratomileusis , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[34]  J. Schwiegerling,et al.  Corneal ablation patterns to correct for spherical aberration in photorefractive keratectomy. , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[35]  R A Applegate,et al.  Optics of aberroscopy and super vision , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[36]  D. Gartry,et al.  Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: comparison of 4.00- and 5.00-millimeter ablation zones. , 1994, Journal of refractive and corneal surgery.

[37]  R. Steinert,et al.  Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison of optical side effects. Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[38]  Y. Payette,et al.  Comparison of the pupil card and pupillometer in measuring pupil size , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[39]  Effect of pupil size on visual function under monocular and binocular conditions in LASIK and non-LASIK patients. , 2003 .