An Approach for the Intelligent Assessment of Future Technology Portfolios

A solid business case is highly dependent upon a strategic and intelligent technology research and development plan, or portfolio, in the early phases of product design. The embodiment of a strategic technology development plan is the identification and subsequent funding of high payoff technology areas that can maximize a company’s return on investment, which entails both performance and economic objectives. This paper describes an approach whereby the high payoff technology areas may be identified to quantitatively justify resource allocation decisions and investment opportunities to meet future organizational goals. The approach includes the simulation of the impact of generic technology areas and the degree of difficulty of technological advances within said areas. The approach results in a dynamic forecasting environment whereby rapid trade-offs can be performed in the conceptual phases of design. This environment allows for intelligently building a successful technology portfolio to facilitate a quantitative justification of a solid business case. A proof on concept application was performed on a next-generation supersonic transport.

[1]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces , 1988 .

[2]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Forecasting the Impact of Technology Infusion on Subsonic Transport Affordability , 1998 .

[3]  Oliver Bandte,et al.  A probabilistic multi-criteria decision making technique for conceptual and preliminary aerospace systems design , 2000 .

[4]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  DEMONSTRATION OF A PROBABILISTIC TECHNIQUE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF AIRCRAFT ECONOMIC VIABILITY , 1997 .

[5]  Successful Application to Weapon Acquisitions Requires Changes in DOD ’ s Environment , .

[6]  Joseph Paul Martino,et al.  Technological Forecasting for Decisionmaking , 1975 .

[7]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Development of a Methodology for the Determination of Technical Feasibility and Viability of Affordable Rotorcraft Systems , 1998 .

[8]  Dimitri N. Mavris.  Demonstration of a Probabilistic Technique for the Determination of Economic Viability of Very Large Transport Configurations , 1998 .

[9]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  A Methodology for Robust Design of Impingement Cooled HSCT Combustion Liners , 1997 .

[10]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  An Application of a Technology Impact Forecasting (TIF) Method to an Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicle , 1999 .

[11]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Forecasting and Management of Technology , 1991 .

[12]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  A Technique for Selecting Emerging Technologies for a Fleet of Commercial Aircraft to Maximize R&D Investment , 2001 .

[13]  Michelle R. Kirby,et al.  A Methodology for Technology Identification, Evaluation, and Selection in Conceptual and Prelimina , 2001 .

[14]  B. C. Twiss,et al.  Forecasting for technologists and engineers: A practical guide for better decisions , 1992 .

[15]  Joseph P. Martino,et al.  An introduction to technological forecasting , 1972 .

[16]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  A Stochastic Design Approach for Aircraft Affordability , 1998 .

[17]  Daniel P. Schrage,et al.  Effect of Mission Requirements on the Economic Robustness of an HSCT Concept , 1997 .