Mobile phones and political participation in Colombia: Mobile Twitter versus mobile Facebook

In this article, we test the relationships between Twitter and Facebook use on mobile phones and political conversation with offline and online political participation, as well as online expressive communication. Our findings show that using Twitter on mobile phones is associated with a higher likelihood for both online and offline political participation, as well as online expressive communication. Using Facebook is associated with a higher likelihood for online expressive communication only. The key contribution of this article is to show empirical differences between the relationships of social media and social networking on mobile devices with political participation and online expressive communication. Public social media apps, such as Twitter, bring mobile communication back into the public realm of a (albeit diffused) broadcast-like channel. Mobile Twitter adds to the affordances of mobility, networked connectivity, and the publicness of social media.

[1]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[3]  D. C. Howell.  Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[4]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism , 2001, Digital Cities.

[5]  Mark Aakhus,et al.  Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance , 2002 .

[6]  Richard Ling,et al.  Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway , 2002 .

[7]  Diana C. Mutz.  The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation , 2002 .

[8]  Christian Licoppe,et al.  ‘Connected’ Presence: The Emergence of a New Repertoire for Managing Social Relationships in a Changing Communication Technoscape , 2004 .

[9]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Statistical Methods for Communication Science , 2005 .

[10]  Diana C. Mutz.  Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[11]  Ye Sun,et al.  Mobilizing Political Talk in a Presidential Campaign , 2006, Commun. Res..

[12]  Mizuko Ito,et al.  Mobile Communication and Selective Sociality , 2006 .

[13]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse , 2006, The Journal of Politics.

[14]  Humberto Martínez-Fresneda Osorio.  Comunicación y ciudadanía , 2008 .

[15]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Mobile Media and Political Collective Action , 2008 .

[16]  Jonathan Donner,et al.  Research Approaches to Mobile Use in the Developing World : A Review of the Literature , 2007 .

[17]  Richard Ling.  New Tech, New Ties: How Mobile Communication Is Reshaping Social Cohesion , 2008 .

[18]  Hernando Rojas,et al.  Mobilizers Mobilized: Information, Expression, Mobilization and Participation in the Digital Age , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Political Discussion Frequency, Network Size, and “Heterogeneity” of Discussion as Predictors of Political Knowledge and Participation , 2009 .

[20]  Shikoh Gitau,et al.  New Paths: Exploring Mobile-Centric Internet Use in South Africa , 2009 .

[21]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[22]  Katy E. Pearce.  Accessible, Useful, and Conspicuous: Socioeconomic and Cultural Determinants of Information and Communication Technology Adoption in the Republic of Armenia , 2011 .

[23]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement , 2011, Commun. Res..

[24]  Scott W. Campbell,et al.  Political Involvement in “Mobilized” Society: The Interactive Relationships Among Mobile Communication, Network Characteristics, and Political Participation , 2011 .

[25]  Heather A. Horst,et al.  Mobile communication in the global south , 2011, New Media Soc..

[26]  Nojin Kwak,et al.  Mobile communication and strong network ties: Shrinking or expanding spheres of public discourse? , 2012, New Media Soc..

[27]  Robert E. Pinsker,et al.  Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. , 2012 .

[28]  D. Boyd,et al.  Socially Mediated Publicness: An Introduction , 2012 .

[29]  D. Murthy.  Towards a Sociological Understanding of Social Media: Theorizing Twitter , 2012 .

[30]  Zeynep Tufekci,et al.  Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square , 2012 .

[31]  S. Valenzuela.  Unpacking the Use of Social Media for Protest Behavior , 2013 .

[32]  Jonathan Bishop,et al.  Networked: The New Social Operating System , 2013, Int. J. E Politics.

[33]  Katy E. Pearce,et al.  Phoning it in: Theory in mobile media and communication in developing countries , 2013 .

[34]  A. Lambert.  Intimacy and Friendship on Facebook , 2013 .

[35]  Lee Humphreys,et al.  Mobile social media: Future challenges and opportunities , 2013 .

[36]  ksmouk.  Merging mobile communication studies and urban research: Mobile locative media, “onscreen encounters” and the reshaping of the interaction order in public places. , 2013 .

[37]  H. G. D. Zúñiga,et al.  Social Media, Political Expression, and Political Participation: Panel Analysis of Lagged and Concurrent Relationships , 2014 .

[38]  Gerard Goggin,et al.  Facebook’s mobile career , 2014, New Media Soc..

[39]  Ran Wei,et al.  Texting, tweeting, and talking: Effects of smartphone use on engagement in civic discourse in China , 2014 .

[40]  Jason A. Martin.  Mobile media and political participation: Defining and developing an emerging field , 2014 .

[41]  Molly C. Jackman,et al.  State of connectivity 2015: A report on global internet access , 2016 .

[42]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .