Interdisciplinary Collaborator Recommendation Based on Research Content Similarity

SUMMARY Most existing methods on research collaborator recom- mendation focus on promoting collaboration within a specific discipline and exploit a network structure derived from co-authorship or co-citation information. To find collaboration opportunities outside researchers’ own fields of expertise and beyond their social network, we present an interdis- ciplinary collaborator recommendation method based on research content similarity. In the proposed method, we calculate textual features that re- flect a researcher’s interests using a research grant database. To find the most relevant researchers who work in other fields, we compare construct- ing a pairwise similarity matrix in a feature space and exploiting existing social networks with content-based similarity. We present a case study at the Graduate University for Advanced Studies in Japan in which actual collaborations across departments are used as ground truth. The re- sults indicate that our content-based approach can accurately predict interdisciplinary collaboration compared with the conventional collaboration network-based approaches.

[1]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation? , 2009, ArXiv.

[2]  Hideaki Takeda,et al.  Topic Representation of Researchers' Interests in a Large-Scale Academic Database and Its Application to Author Disambiguation , 2015, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Heidi Ledford How to solve the world's biggest problems , 2015, Nature.

[4]  Leah G. Nichols A topic model approach to measuring interdisciplinarity at the National Science Foundation , 2014, Scientometrics.

[5]  Xi Chen,et al.  Cross-Domain Scientific Collaborations Prediction with Citation Information , 2014, 2014 IEEE 38th International Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops.

[6]  Atsuhiro Takasu,et al.  Collaborator Recommendation for Isolated Researchers , 2014, 2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.

[7]  Feng Xia,et al.  ACRec: a co-authorship based random walk model for academic collaboration recommendation , 2014, WWW.

[8]  Kei Kurakawa,et al.  Researcher Name Resolver: identifier management system for Japanese researchers , 2014, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[9]  Jimeng Sun,et al.  Cross-domain collaboration recommendation , 2012, KDD.

[10]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  Similar researcher search in academic environments , 2012, JCDL '12.

[11]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Topics in dynamic research communities: An exploratory study for the field of information retrieval , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Daniel A. McFarland,et al.  A study of academic collaboration in computational linguistics with latent mixtures of authors , 2011, ACL 2011.

[13]  F. J. Rijnsoever,et al.  Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration , 2011 .

[14]  Jung Cheol Shin,et al.  Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: research preference, collaboration, and time on research , 2010, Scientometrics.

[15]  Michael Ley,et al.  DBLP - Some Lessons Learned , 2009, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[16]  Alfred Kieser,et al.  How much do specialists have to learn from each other when they jointly develop radical product innovations , 2008 .

[17]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The link-prediction problem for social networks , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  A. Stirling A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Fast Random Walk with Restart and Its Applications , 2006, Sixth International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'06).

[20]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[21]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Friends and neighbors on the Web , 2003, Soc. Networks.