Risk of childhood leukemia after low-level exposure to ionizing radiation

Leukemia risk models There is unambiguous epidemiological evidence that exposure to moderate and high doses of ionizing radiation increases the subsequent risk of leukemia [1,2]. This evidence is based upon studies of the Japanese survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, and groups exposed therapeutically or occupationally. Models of radiation-induced leukemia risk derived from leukemia mortality among the Japanese atomic bomb survivors adopt a linear dose–response relationship in the low-dose (<100 mGy) region, and assume that there is no threshold dose below which there is an absence of risk [1,2]. The implication of these models is that even low doses of radiation increase the risk of leukemia to some (albeit small) extent. In the low-dose region, the excess relative risk (ERR) coefficient (the proportional increase in risk over background per unit radiation dose received by the red bone marrow) is predicted to increase after a minimum latent period of 2 years, and this increase is especially steep for those exposed as children, rising to a maximum of approximately 50 Gy some 7 years after exposure. The ERR then attenuates, so that, at 25 years after exposure, it is approximately 2, which is the proportional increase in risk experienced this long after exposure by those irradiated as adults [3,4]. Therefore, for those exposed as children, the proportional increase in the risk of leukemia is expressed over time as a distinct ‘wave’.

[1]  J. Lubin,et al.  The Statistical Power of Epidemiological Studies Analyzing the Relationship between Exposure to Ionizing Radiation and Cancer, with Special Reference to Childhood Leukemia and Natural Background Radiation , 2010, Radiation research.

[2]  S. Darby,et al.  Temporal trends in childhood leukaemia incidence following exposure to radioactive fallout from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing , 2010, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[3]  M. Charles Effects of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: UNSCEAR 2006 Report, Volume 1—Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes A and B , 2010 .

[4]  M. Little,et al.  Updated estimates of the proportion of childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain that may be caused by natural background ionising radiation , 2009, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[5]  D. Richardson,et al.  Ionizing Radiation and Leukemia Mortality among Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors, 1950–2000 , 2009, Radiation research.

[6]  E. Hall,et al.  Low Dose Radiation Epidemiology: What Can It Tell Us? , 2009, Radiation research.

[7]  T. Fell,et al.  Dose to red bone marrow of infants, children and adults from radiation of natural origin , 2009, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[8]  M. Little,et al.  The proportion of childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain that may be caused by natural background ionizing radiation , 2009, Leukemia.

[9]  D. Laurier,et al.  Epidemiological studies of leukaemia in children and young adults around nuclear facilities: a critical review. , 2008, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[10]  Richard Wakeford,et al.  Childhood leukaemia following medical diagnostic exposure to ionizing radiation in utero or after birth. , 2008, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[11]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  M. Little,et al.  Are cancer risks associated with exposures to ionising radiation from internal emitters greater than those in the Japanese A-bomb survivors? , 2007, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[13]  Yukiko Shimizu,et al.  Effect of Recent Changes in Atomic Bomb Survivor Dosimetry on Cancer Mortality Risk Estimates , 2004, Radiation research.

[14]  R. Wakeford Childhood leukaemia and radiation exposure of fathers--the end of the road, perhaps? , 2003, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[15]  M. Little,et al.  Risk coefficients for childhood cancer after intrauterine irradiation: a review , 2003, International journal of radiation biology.

[16]  Jack Valentin,et al.  Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus) , 2003 .

[17]  岩崎 民子 SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[18]  M. Little,et al.  A review of the risks of leukemia in relation to parental pre-conception exposure to radiation. , 1995, Health Physics.

[19]  A J Hall,et al.  Results of case-control study of leukaemia and lymphoma among young people near Sellafield nuclear plant in West Cumbria. , 1990, BMJ.

[20]  T. Fell,et al.  The risk of leukemia in Seascale from radiation exposure. , 1988, Health physics.

[21]  D. Crouch Science and trans-science in radiation risk assessment: child cancer around the nuclear fuel reprocessing plant at Sellafield, U.K. , 1986, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation : BEIR VII Phase 2 4 / 10 / 2011 , 2011 .

[23]  C. Streffer,et al.  Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus). A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. , 2003, Annals of the ICRP.

[24]  Enrique Egaña,et al.  Effects of Ionizing Radiation , 1971 .

[25]  Qu Liang,et al.  The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation , 1965, Nature.