Feedback Control Over Lossy SNR-Limited Channels: Linear Encoder–Decoder–Controller Design

In this paper, we consider the problem of encoding and decoding codesign for linear feedback control of a scalar, possibly unstable, stochastic linear system when the sensed signal is to be transmitted over a finite capacity communication channel. In particular, we consider a limited capacity channel which transmits quantized data and is subject to packet losses. We first characterize the optimal strategy when perfect channel feedback is available, i.e., the transmitter has perfect knowledge of the packet loss history. This optimal scheme, innovation forwarding hereafter, is reminiscent of differential pulse-code modulation schemes adapted to deal with state space models, and is strictly better than a scheme which simply transmits the measured data, called measurement forwarding (MF) hereafter. Comparison in terms of control cost as well as of critical regimes, i.e., regimes where the cost is not finite, are provided. We also consider and compare two popular suboptimal schemes from the existing literature, based on 1) state estimate forwarding and 2) measurement forwarding, which ignore quantization effects in the associated estimator and controller design. In particular, it is shown that surprisingly the suboptimal MF strategy is always better then the suboptimal state forwarding strategy for small signal-to-quantization-noise-ratios.

[1]  Bruno Sinopoli,et al.  Foundations of Control and Estimation Over Lossy Networks , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  Alessandro Chiuso,et al.  Remote Estimation With Noisy Measurements Subject to Packet Loss and Quantization Noise , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[3]  Tamer Basar,et al.  Optimal control of LTI systems over unreliable communication links , 2006, Autom..

[4]  Sekhar Tatikonda,et al.  A Counterexample in Distributed Optimal Sensing and Control , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[5]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Optimal LQG control across packet-dropping links , 2007, Syst. Control. Lett..

[6]  Koji Tsumura,et al.  Tradeoffs between quantization and packet loss in networked control of linear systems , 2009, Autom..

[7]  David L. Neuhoff,et al.  The validity of the additive noise model for uniform scalar quantizers , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  V. Borkar,et al.  LQG Control with Communication Constraints , 1997 .

[9]  Ling Shi,et al.  Estimation schemes for networked control systems using UDP-like communication , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Nevio Benvenuto,et al.  State control in networked control systems under packet drops and limited transmission bandwidth , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[11]  S. Sahai,et al.  The necessity and sufficiency of anytime capacity for control over a noisy communication link , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[12]  Keyou You,et al.  Minimum Data Rate for Mean Square Stabilizability of Linear Systems With Markovian Packet Losses , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  Bruno Sinopoli,et al.  Optimal linear LQG control over lossy networks without packet acknowledgment , 2008 .

[14]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  LQG-like control of scalar systems over communication channels: The role of data losses, delays and SNR limitations , 2014, Autom..

[15]  R. Murray,et al.  Optimal LQG Control Across a Packet-Dropping Link , 2004 .

[16]  Eduardo I. Silva,et al.  Performance limitations for single-input LTI plants controlled over SNR constrained channels with feedback , 2013, Autom..

[17]  Emanuele Garone,et al.  LQG control over lossy TCP-like networks with probabilistic packet acknowledgements , 2010 .

[18]  Massimo Franceschetti,et al.  Stabilization Over Markov Feedback Channels: The General Case , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[19]  Alessandro Chiuso,et al.  Linear encoder-decoder-controller design over channels with packet loss and quantization noise , 2015, 2015 European Control Conference (ECC).

[20]  Tamer Basar,et al.  Optimal control of dynamical systems over unreliable communication links , 2004 .

[21]  Richard H. Middleton,et al.  Feedback stabilization over signal-to-noise ratio constrained channels , 2007, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[22]  Sekhar Tatikonda,et al.  Control under communication constraints , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[23]  Mikael Skoglund,et al.  Nonlinear distributed sensing for closed-loop control over Gaussian channels , 2011, 2011 IEEE Swedish Communication Technologies Workshop (Swe-CTW).

[24]  Munther A. Dahleh,et al.  Feedback Control in the Presence of Noisy Channels: “Bode-Like” Fundamental Limitations of Performance , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[25]  H. Witsenhausen A Counterexample in Stochastic Optimum Control , 1968 .

[26]  Nicola Elia,et al.  Limitations of Linear Control Over Packet Drop Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[27]  Andrey V. Savkin,et al.  The problem of LQG optimal control via a limited capacity communication channel , 2004, Syst. Control. Lett..

[28]  Anant Sahai,et al.  The Necessity and Sufficiency of Anytime Capacity for Stabilization of a Linear System Over a Noisy Communication Link—Part I: Scalar Systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[29]  N. Elia,et al.  Limitations of linear remote control over packet drop networks , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[30]  Vivek K Goyal High-rate transform coding: how high is high, and does it matter? , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (Cat. No.00CH37060).

[31]  Subhrakanti Dey,et al.  Quantized Filtering Schemes for Multi-Sensor Linear State Estimation: Stability and Performance Under High Rate Quantization , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.