E-Procurement: Myth or Reality

Governments across the globe appear to identify and tout technology as a way to transform how they govern. Public procurement is at the forefront of most reform efforts given that it plays a significant role in promoting accountability and transparency. This study relies on survey data of procurement professionals to delineate the current status of e- procurement implementation in United States and Canada. Findings suggest that digitalized public procurement has not yet led to significant transformative changes. Unsuitability of software platforms, organizational resistance, lack of strategic systems' integration and failure to involve public procurement professionals in the design of e-procurement systems were identified as the primary obstacles of effectively implementing digital procurement. These findings suggest that in order to capitalize on the potentially transformative nature of ICT in procurement, policymakers, system designers, and procurement professionals must take an active role in both the design of the software and its adoption across political, institutional and behavioral domains.

[1]  Phillip J. Cooper,et al.  Governing by Contract: Challenges and Opportunities for Public Managers , 2002 .

[2]  E. Turban,et al.  Electronic Commerce: A Managerial Perspective , 1999 .

[3]  Dr. Anders Hanberger Democratic Implications of Public Organizations , 2003 .

[4]  D. West Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance , 2007 .

[5]  Katarina Arbin,et al.  E-procurement maturity in industry , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Bus..

[6]  E. Sclar YOU DON'T ALWAYS GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR. THE ECONOMICS OF PRIVATIZATION , 2000 .

[7]  Khalid S. Soliman,et al.  An exploratory study to identify the critical factors affecting the decision to establish Internet-based interorganizational information systems , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Tanya Castleman,et al.  Electronic Procurement in Government: More Complicated than Just Good Business , 2001, ECIS.

[9]  M. Varney E-Procurement—current law and future challenges , 2011 .

[10]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  Policy Recommendations for Electronic Public Procurement , 2005 .

[11]  Alistair Brandon-Jones,et al.  The impact of user‐perceived e‐procurement quality on system and contract compliance , 2011 .

[12]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Governing the Hollow State , 2000 .

[13]  W. Orlikowski Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[14]  J. Fountain Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[15]  Mohamed G. Aboelmaged,et al.  Predicting e-procurement adoption in a developing country: An empirical integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behaviour , 2010, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[16]  Tanvi Kothari,et al.  E-Procurement: An emerging tool for the hotel supply chain management , 2005 .

[17]  Susan P. Williams,et al.  E-government policy and practice: A theoretical and empirical exploration of public e-procurement , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  E-Procurement Adoption in the Danish Public Sector: The Influence of Economic and Political Rationality , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Michael McGuire,et al.  Multinetwork Management: Collaboration and the Hollow State in Local Economic Policy , 1998 .

[20]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Electronic commerce 2006: a managerial perspective , 2006 .

[21]  W. Orlikowski The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[22]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Current practices of leading e-government countries , 2005, Commun. ACM.

[23]  Huaiqing Wang,et al.  An agent based approach for exception handling in e-procurement management , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  The Myths of E-Government: Looking Beyond the Assumptions of a New and Better Government , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[26]  Andrew Cox,et al.  Sourcing Indirect Spend: A Survey of Current Internal and External Strategies for Non-Revenue-Generating Goods and Services , 2005 .

[27]  Carl Erik Moe,et al.  Public e-Procurement - Determinants of Attitudes Towards Adoption , 2004, EGOV.

[28]  Stephen P. Osborne,et al.  The New Public Governance? 1 , 2006 .

[29]  Andrea Lösch,et al.  E-Reverse Auctions Revisited: An Analysis of Context, Buyer–Supplier Relations and Information Behavior , 2007 .

[30]  Lisa M. Ellram,et al.  Activities related to purchasing and supply management involvement in supplier alliances , 2001 .

[31]  C. Hood,et al.  The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox? , 2004 .

[32]  宇賀 克也 パブリック・コメントにおけるインターネットの利用 Stephen M.Johnson,The Internet Changes Everything:Revolutionizing Public Participation and Access to Government Information Through the Internet , 2000 .

[33]  Vincent Homburg,et al.  New Public Management in Europe , 2007 .

[34]  Kim Normann Andersen,et al.  Fractional Institutional Endeavors and eProcurement in Local Government , 2009, Bled eConference.

[35]  Kit Hong Wong,et al.  Adoption of e-procurement and participation of e-marketplace on firm performance: Trust as a moderator , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[36]  L. D. Boer,et al.  A conceptual model for assessing the impact of electronic procurement , 2002 .

[37]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance , 2005 .

[38]  S. Croom The Impact of Web-Based Procurement on the Management of Operating Resources Supply , 2000 .

[39]  Michael McGuire,et al.  THE LIMITATIONS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT NETWORKS , 2011 .

[40]  Rob Kling,et al.  Learning About Information Technologies and Social Change: The Contribution of Social Informatics , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[41]  Accountable Agents: Federal Performance Measurement and Third-Party Government , 2010 .

[42]  Harry Bouwman,et al.  Information and communication technology in organizations , 2005 .

[43]  Flavio Perazzo Barbosa Mota,et al.  Public e-procurement and the duality of technology: a comparative study in the context of Brazil and of the state of Paraíba , 2011 .

[44]  E. Savas,et al.  Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships , 1999 .

[45]  Robert Johnston,et al.  E‐service: enhancing internal customer service through e‐procurement , 2003 .

[46]  Per Lægreid Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms , 2013 .

[47]  Prabhudev Konana,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Internet Use in Procurement: An Empirical Investigation of U.S. Manufacturing Firms , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  Joerg Leukel,et al.  A comparative analysis of product classification in public vs. private e-procurement , 2005 .