Axiomatic First-Order Probability

Most languages for the Semantic Web have their logical basis in some fragment of first-order logic. Thus, integrating first-order logic with probability is fundamental for representing and reasoning with uncertainty in the semantic web. Defining semantics for probability logics presents a dilemma: a logic that assigns a real-valued probability to any first-order sentence cannot be axiomatized and lacks a complete proof theory. This paper develops a first-order axiomatic theory of probability in which probability is formalized as a function mapping Godel numbers to elements of a real closed field. The resulting logic is fully first-order and recursively axiomatizable, and therefore has a complete proof theory. This gives rise to a plausible reasoning logic with a number of desirable properties: the logic can represent arbitrarily fine-grained degrees of plausibility intermediate between proof and disproof; all mathematical and logical assumptions can be explicitly represented as finite computational structures accessible to automated reasoners; contradictions can be discovered in finite time; and the logic supports learning from observation.

[1]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  UnBBayes: Modeling Uncertainty for Plausible Reasoning in the Semantic Web , 2010 .

[2]  G. Sacks A DECISION METHOD FOR ELEMENTARY ALGEBRA AND GEOMETRY , 2003 .

[3]  A. Dawid Calibration-Based Empirical Probability , 1985 .

[4]  Marc Snir,et al.  Probabilities over rich languages, testing and randomness , 1982, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[5]  Herbert B. Enderton,et al.  A mathematical introduction to logic , 1972 .

[6]  Kathryn B. Laskey MEBN: A language for first-order Bayesian knowledge bases , 2008, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Thomas Lukasiewicz Uncertainty Representation and Reasoning in the Semantic Web , 2008 .

[8]  David Lindley,et al.  de Finetti, Bruno , 2005 .

[9]  H. Gaifman Concerning measures in first order calculi , 1964 .

[10]  Vic Barnett,et al.  Comparative Statistical Inference , 1974, Technometrics.

[11]  Per Martin-Löf,et al.  The Definition of Random Sequences , 1966, Inf. Control..

[12]  Fahiem Bacchus,et al.  Representing and reasoning with probabilistic knowledge - a logical approach to probabilities , 1991 .

[13]  Dirk Siefkes,et al.  Association For Symbolic Logic , 2000, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic.

[14]  William I. Gasarch,et al.  Book Review: An introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and its Applications Second Edition, 1997 by Ming Li and Paul Vitanyi (Springer (Graduate Text Series)) , 1997, SIGACT News.

[15]  L. Stein,et al.  Probability and the Weighing of Evidence , 1950 .

[16]  G. Wetherill,et al.  Comparative Statistical Inference , 1974, Technometrics.

[17]  Ming Li,et al.  An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications , 1997, Texts in Computer Science.

[18]  Joseph Y. Halpern An Analysis of First-Order Logics of Probability , 1989, IJCAI.

[19]  I. Good Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and Its Applications , 1983 .

[20]  John W. Lloyd,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in a classical logic , 2009, J. Appl. Log..

[21]  Joseph R. Shoenfield,et al.  Mathematical logic , 1967 .

[22]  L. M. M.-T. Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.