An adaptive cue combination model of spatial reorientation
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al. Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information , 2007, Animal Cognition.
[2] K. Cheng. A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.
[3] S. Shettleworth,et al. Learning about Environmental Geometry: an Associative Model , 2022 .
[4] Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al. Dissecting the Geometric Module , 2006, Psychological science.
[5] Ken Cheng,et al. Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[6] Alexandra D. Twyman,et al. Malleability in the development of spatial reorientation. , 2013, Developmental psychobiology.
[7] Peter L. Hurd,et al. Growing in Circles , 2007 .
[8] Ken Cheng,et al. 25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[9] J. Huttenlocher,et al. Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.
[10] J. Rieser,et al. Bayesian integration of spatial information. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.
[11] Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al. Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size. , 2005, Developmental science.
[12] Giorgio Vallortigara,et al. Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment , 2007, Animal Cognition.
[13] Alexandra D. Twyman,et al. Young children's use of features to reorient is more than just associative: further evidence against a modular view of spatial processing. , 2010, Developmental science.
[14] Nora S Newcombe,et al. Reorienting When Cues Conflict , 2008, Psychological science.
[15] Alinda Friedman,et al. Penetrating the geometric module: catalyzing children's use of landmarks. , 2007, Developmental psychology.
[16] Debbie M. Kelly,et al. Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .
[17] Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al. Sources of Flexibility in Human Cognition: Dual-Task Studies of Space and Language , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.
[18] Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al. How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces , 2006, Animal Cognition.
[19] Noam Miller,et al. Modeling the effects of enclosure size on geometry learning , 2009, Behavioural Processes.
[20] L. Hedges,et al. Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. , 1991, Psychological review.
[21] Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al. A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.
[22] C. Gallistel. The organization of learning , 1990 .
[23] Lynn Nadel,et al. Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.
[24] E. Spelke,et al. Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.
[25] J. Huttenlocher,et al. Development of Spatial Cognition , 2007 .
[26] Marcia L Spetch,et al. Reorientation in a two-dimensional environment: I. Do adults encode the featural and geometric properties of a two-dimensional schematic of a room? , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.
[27] Nora S. Newcombe,et al. Is language necessary for human spatial reorientation? Reconsidering evidence from dual task paradigms , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.
[28] Giorgio Vallortigara,et al. Experience and geometry: controlled-rearing studies with chicks , 2010, Animal Cognition.