Towards the Teaching of Motor Skills as a System of Growing Complexity

The teaching of motor skills has been strongly influenced by the conception of motor learning process teachers and coaches adopt. Current theories of motor learning are basically concerned with the stabilization of performance, that is, with a process seeking for functional stabilization by means of negative feedback. These theories do not account for the open system nature of human beings. Open systems by exchanging mater, energy, and information with the environment are able to break down the achieved stability and seek growing complexity. Thus, an alternative model of motor learning is proposed, which considers motor skill acquisition as a cyclic and continuous process of instability and stability. In this model, motor learning takes place through two hierarchical processes: stabilization and adaptation. The first refers to the functional stabilization, that is, pattern formation by the spatiotemporal organization of the action. This is the current emphasis in the teaching of motor skills. The second refers to the reorganization of the acquired patterns in response to the perturbation (new task demands or goals), that is, adaptation. In this process the basic question is what kind of pattern or structure should be formed to account for the perturbation or what type of competence is required from the motor system to perturbation become an agent of change towards complexity? The motor skill cannot be represented as a fixed pattern but as a pattern that reorganizes itself in the context of new learning process. In other words, it has some degree of stability but can reconstruct itself when destabilized by perturbation. From this perspective, factors related to disorder as uncertainty, variability, error, and diversity should be focused as a means to promote adaptation. In the educational context how to teach motor skills with the adaptive process in mind is a big challenge. That is the question addressed in this chapter.

[1]  Christopher G. Langton,et al.  Life at the Edge of Chaos , 1992 .

[2]  P. Bak,et al.  Self-organized criticality in the 'Game of Life" , 1989, Nature.

[3]  Constant-Random Practice and the Adaptive Process in Motor Learning with Varying Amounts of Constant Practice , 2010, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  Timothy K. Smith,et al.  Student-centered physical education : strategies for developing middle school fitness and skills , 1998 .

[5]  L. Bertalanffy The theory of open systems in physics and biology. , 1950 .

[6]  Go Tani,et al.  The Influence of a Goalkeeper as an Outfield Player on Defensive Subsystems in Futsal , 2014 .

[7]  Magoroh Maruyama,et al.  THE SECOND CYBERNETICS Deviation-Amplifying Mutual Causal Processes , 1963 .

[8]  D. Glencross 34 Levels and Strategies of Response Organization , 1980 .

[9]  Alan Garfinkel,et al.  Self-organizing systems : the emergence of order , 1987 .

[11]  Umberto Cesar Corrêa,et al.  Estrutura de prática e idade no processo adaptativo da aprendizagem de uma tarefa de "timing" coincidente , 2010 .

[12]  Corey S. Powell,et al.  Hubble Bags a Great White , 1991 .

[13]  M. Mitchell Waldrop,et al.  Complexity : the emerging science and the edge of order and chaos , 1992 .

[14]  Keith Davids,et al.  The Role of Nonlinear Pedagogy in Physical Education , 2007 .

[15]  Go Tani,et al.  The game of futsal as an adaptive process. , 2012, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[16]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[17]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: perception of catchableness of fly balls. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  K M Newell,et al.  On task and theory specificity. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  P. Bak,et al.  Self-organized criticality , 1991 .

[20]  N. D. Cook Stability and Flexibility: An Analysis of Natural Systems , 1980 .

[21]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  Toward a Taxonomy of Human Performance. , 1975 .

[22]  Henderien W. Steenbeek,et al.  The emergence of learning-teaching trajectories in education: a complex dynamic systems approach. , 2013, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[23]  Herbert Ugrinowitsch,et al.  An adaptive process model of motor learning: insights for the teaching of motor skills. , 2014, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[24]  J. Deese The psychology of learning , 1952 .

[25]  H. Whiting Concepts in skill learning , 1975 .

[26]  G. Tani,et al.  Effects of practice schedule on the adaptive process of motor learning , 2010 .

[27]  Go Tani,et al.  Diversification of motor skills rely upon an optimal amount of variability of perceptive and motor task demands , 2015, Adapt. Behav..

[28]  Martin Gardner,et al.  Problems of Life. , 1953 .

[29]  Keith Davids,et al.  Nonlinear pedagogy: a constraints-led framework for understanding emergence of game play and movement skills. , 2006, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[30]  I. Prigogine The end of certainty , 1997 .

[31]  Stanley S. Salthe,et al.  Hierarchical Non-Equilibrium Self-Organization as the New Post-Cybernetic Perspective , 1992 .

[32]  Craig A. Wrisberg Sport Skill Instruction for Coaches , 2007 .

[33]  Umberto Cesar Corrêa,et al.  Prática constante-aleatória e aprendizagem motora: Efeitos da quantidade de prática constante e da manipulação de exigências motoras da tarefa , 2006 .

[34]  Go Tani,et al.  Different Faces of Variability in the Adaptive Process of Motor Skill Learning. , 2015, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[35]  Effects of the amount and schedule of varied practice after constant practice on the adaptive process of motor learning , 2014 .

[36]  Go Tani EDUCAÇÃO FISICA NA PRE-ESCOLA E NAS QUATRO PRIMEIRAS SÉRIES DO ENSINO DE PRIMEIRO GRAU: UM ABORDAGEM DE DESENVOLVIMENTO I , 2013, Kinesis.