Long-term potentiation and memory.

The discovery of long-term potentiation (LTP) transformed research on the neurobiology of learning and memory. This did not happen overnight, but the discovery of an experimentally demonstrable phenomenon reflecting activity-driven neuronal and synaptic plasticity changed discussions about what might underlie learning from speculation into something much more concrete. Equally, however, the relationship between the discovery of LTP and research on the neurobiology of learning and memory has been reciprocal; for it is also true that studies of the psychological, anatomical and neurochemical basis of memory provided a developing and critical intellectual context for the physiological discovery. The emerging concept of multiple memory systems, from 1970 onwards, paved the way for the development of new behavioural and cognitive tasks, including the watermaze described in this paper. The use of this task in turn provided key evidence that pharmacological interference with an LTP induction mechanism would also interfere with learning, a finding that was by no means a foregone conclusion. This reciprocal relationship between studies of LTP and the neurobiology of memory helped the physiological phenomenon to be recognized as a major discovery.

[1]  WILLIAM M. LANDAU,et al.  Clinical Neurosurgery , 1969, Neurology.

[2]  D Marr,et al.  Simple memory: a theory for archicortex. , 1971, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  E. Warrington,et al.  New Method of Testing Long-term Retention with Special Reference to Amnesic Patients , 1968, Nature.

[4]  R. Morris,et al.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions , 1982, Nature.

[5]  M Mishkin,et al.  An analysis of short-term visual memory in the monkey. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[6]  D. Olton,et al.  Animal Behavior Processes , 2022 .

[7]  S. J. Martin,et al.  New life in an old idea: The synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis revisited , 2002, Hippocampus.

[8]  G. Collingridge,et al.  Excitatory amino acids in synaptic transmission in the Schaffer collateral‐commissural pathway of the rat hippocampus. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  W. Scoville,et al.  LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS , 1957, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[10]  E. Capaldi,et al.  The organization of behavior. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[11]  G. Lynch,et al.  The biochemistry of memory: a new and specific hypothesis. , 1984, Science.

[12]  R. Rescorla A theory of pavlovian conditioning: The effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement , 1972 .

[13]  A. Sahgal Neurobiology of the Hippocampus, W. Seifert (Ed.). Academic Press (1983), xxviii + 632, ISBN: 0 126 34880 4 , 1984 .

[14]  G. Lynch,et al.  Intracellular injections of EGTA block induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation , 1983, Nature.

[15]  Gurindar S. Sohi,et al.  Memory systems , 1996, CSUR.

[16]  R. Morris,et al.  Impaired spatial learning after saturation of long-term potentiation. , 1998, Science.

[17]  J L McGaugh,et al.  Time-Dependent Processes in Memory Storage , 1966, Science.

[18]  W. Seifert Neurobiology of the hippocampus , 1983 .

[19]  G. Lynch,et al.  Chronic administration of a thiol-proteinase inhibitor blocks long-term potentiation of synaptic responses , 1988, Brain Research.

[20]  R. Morris Spatial Localization Does Not Require the Presence of Local Cues , 1981 .

[21]  J. O'Keefe,et al.  The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. , 1971, Brain research.

[22]  C. Barnes Memory deficits associated with senescence: a neurophysiological and behavioral study in the rat. , 1979, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[23]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[24]  P. Andersen A prelude to long-term potentiation. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[25]  S. J. Martin,et al.  Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[26]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Recognition impaired and association intact in the memory of monkeys after transection of the fornix. , 1974, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[27]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Long-term enhancement of hippocampal synaptic transmission and the acquisition of spatial information , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  L. Nadel,et al.  Spatial learning in the rat: impairment induced by the thiol-proteinase inhibitor, leupeptin, and an analysis of [3H]glutamate receptor binding in relation to learning. , 1987, Behavioral and neural biology.

[29]  L. Kamin Attention-like processes in classical conditioning , 1967 .

[30]  T. Bliss,et al.  Long‐lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  G. Lynch,et al.  Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5 , 1986, Nature.