Development of a Rolling Dynamic Deflectometer for Continuous Deflection Testing of Pavements

A rolling dynamic deflectometer (RDD) was developed as a nondestructive method for determining continuous deflection profiles of pavements. Unlike other commonly used pavement testing methods, the RDD performs continuous rather than discrete measurements. The ability to perform continuous measurements makes RDD testing very effective for quickly characterizing large sections of pavement while simultaneously providing a comprehensive picture of the pavement condition, with little danger of missing critical pavement features. RDD testing is performed while the RDD vehicle travels at speeds of up to 1.5 mph (2.4 km/hr). Continuous defection profiles determined with the RDD can be used to: 1) assess the overall stiffness of a pavement; 2) differentiate the relative stiffnesses of different regions; 3) detect cracks, joints, and weak regions; 4) assess the performance of cracked or jointed regions; 5) delineate the regions of the pavement influenced by joints and cracks; and 6) identify areas where additional discrete testing should be performed. The RDD is a powerful tool having the potential for: 1) designing pavement repairs and retrofits, 2) estimating the remaining life of pavements, and 3) functioning as a quality assurance and quality control system during the construction of new pavements. The RDD was constructed by modifying the electrohydraulic loading system on a Vibroseis truck. The RDD applies large sinusoidal dynamic forces to the pavement through specially designed loading rollers. The resulting deflections are simultaneously measured by rolling sensors designed to minimize the influence of noise caused by rough pavement surfaces. Distance measuring and data acquisition systems were designed to record the forces applied to the pavement and the resulting dynamic displacements; these systems also track the position of the RDD. The RDD was used to determine continuous deflection profiles at two sites on Interstate Highway 10 over a total length of 21 mi (33.5 km). These results were used to assess the condition of the pavement and to design an overlay. The RDD was also used to test runway and taxiway airport pavements at the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport as part of a project to predict the remaining life of the airport pavements. Finally, the RDD was used in a stationary mode to dynamically load bridges and bridge foundations. All testing except the bridge project is presented in this report.

[1]  William D. Stanley Operational Amplifiers with Linear Integrated Circuits , 1989 .

[2]  R F Johnson,et al.  Rolling Weight Deflectometer with Thermal and Vibrational Bending Compensation , 1996 .

[3]  Kenneth H. Stokoe,et al.  Analysis of Remaining Life for Runway 17R-35L and Taxiway L at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Volume II Final Report , 1997 .

[4]  Emmanuel Ifeachor,et al.  Digital Signal Processing: A Practical Approach , 1993 .

[5]  Ronald L Terrel,et al.  COMPARISON OF FALLING WEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER WITH OTHER DEFLECTION TESTING DEVICES , 1985 .

[6]  Anton Ziolkowski,et al.  The Vibroseis source , 1990 .

[7]  Ronald N. Bracewell,et al.  The Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1966 .

[8]  P Ullidtz,et al.  DANISH EXPERIMENTS WITH THE FRENCH FALLING WEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER , 1972 .

[9]  Marshall R Thompson,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SELECTED NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING DEVICES , 1982 .

[10]  Lobo Carneiro F Bolivar BENKELMAN BEAM-AUXILIARY INSTRUMENT OF THE MAINTENANCE ENGINEER , 1966 .

[11]  Kenneth H. Stokoe,et al.  Response of pavement systems to dynamic loads imposed by nondestructive tests , 1995 .

[12]  Kenneth Harold Waters,et al.  Reflection Seismology: A Tool for Energy Resource Exploration , 1978 .

[13]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS AND USER SATISFACTION OF COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE NDT EQUIPMENT (DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE) , 1985 .

[14]  Kenneth H. Stokoe,et al.  Determination of depth to bedrock from falling weight deflectometer test data , 1995 .

[15]  F. E. Richart,et al.  Vibrations of soils and foundations , 1970 .

[16]  K H Stokoe,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF ROLLING DYNAMIC DEFLECTOMETER , 1995 .

[17]  Ernest Zube,et al.  FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS AS DETERMINED BY DEFLECTION MEASUREMENT , 1966 .

[18]  F H Scrivner,et al.  A NEW RESEARCH TOOL FOR MEASURING PAVEMENT DEFLECTION , 1966 .

[19]  John W. Bedenbender,et al.  Force or pressure feedback control for seismic vibrators , 1985 .

[20]  Kenneth H. Stokoe,et al.  PREDICTION OF REMAINING LIFE ON AIRPORT PAVEMENTS , 1997 .

[21]  J Paquet The CEBTP curviameter - a new instrument for measuring highway pavement deflection , 1977 .

[22]  Dennis K. Reust,et al.  Enhanced servovalve technology for seismic vibrators , 1991 .