Key lessons for the design and integration of virtual environments in secondary science

This paper discusses a 3 year research project in which a virtual enviroment (VE) to teach radioactivity was developed and tested in a number of schools. Many software packages currently developed for schools tend to be fairly generic, covering a topic quite broadly. There has been a lack of attention to teachers' requirements and needs. This research emphasised the importance of involving teachers through the development process, from specification to evaluation. It also confirmed the importance of school-based evaluation studies in the development and evaluation of educational software. Through carrying out school-based evaluation studies a number of key considerations were identified. These "contextual considerations" covered three areas seen to be important in the design and development of an educational VE: facilities and equipment available, intended use in school and individual learner characteristics. Lessons learnt from this research may prove to be useful guidelines for future researchers. As such, a framework has been developed as a recommendation for a suitable method for the design, development and evaluation of virtual environments for education, and more generally other educational software applications.

[1]  Roger Frost.  Reflections on software for teaching science , 1997 .

[2]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Predicting quality in educational software: Evaluating For Learning, Usability and the Synergy between Them , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[3]  Josie Taylor.  Moving into Multimedia: Issues for Teaching and Learning , 1996 .

[4]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Experimental Comparison of Virtual Reality with Traditional Teaching Methods for Teaching Radioactivity , 2000, Education and Information Technologies.

[5]  Denise Whitelock,et al.  The roles of gaze, gesture and gender in CSCL , 1998, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[6]  Richard Riding,et al.  Cognitive style, gender and learning from multi-media materials in 11-year-old children , 1999, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[7]  Paul Brna,et al.  Adding intelligence to a learning environment: learner-centred design? , 1998, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[8]  Thomas A. Furness,et al.  Virtual Reality and Education , 1994, Exploring a New Partnership: Children, Teachers and Technology.

[9]  Meredith Bricken,et al.  Summer Students in Virtual Reality , 1992 .

[10]  Geoffrey Underwood,et al.  Computers and Learning: Helping Children Acquire Thinking Skills, Geoffrey Underwood & Jean Underwood. 1990. Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA. 209 pages. ISBN: 0-631-15807-3 (hc); 0-631-15808-1 (pb). $42.95 (hc); $14.95 (pb , 1992 .

[11]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[12]  Tom Carey,et al.  Human-computer interaction , 1994 .

[13]  J. Olson,et al.  Schoolworlds/Microworlds: Computers and the Culture of the Classroom , 1988 .

[14]  Ward Mitchell Cates.  Fifteen principles for designing more effective instructional hypermedia/multimedia products , 1992 .

[15]  David J. Brown,et al.  Development and Evaluation of the Virtual City , 1999, Int. J. Virtual Real..

[16]  Suzanne Weghorst.  Human interface technology laboratory , 1992 .

[17]  Marilyn C. Salzman,et al.  ScienceSpace: virtual realities for learning complex and abstract scientific concepts , 1996, Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[18]  Sarah Nichols,et al.  Theme-based content analysis: a flexible method for virtual environment evaluation , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Charles E. Hughes,et al.  The virtual academy: A simulated environment for constructionist learning , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  Contexts for evaluating educational software , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[21]  Christina Vasilakis,et al.  Learning and Building Together in an Immersive Virtual World , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[22]  Chris Dede,et al.  Assessing Virtual Reality's Potential for Teaching Abstract Science , 1997 .

[23]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments , 1997, CHI.

[24]  Margaret I. Brown,et al.  Integrative evaluation: an emerging role for classroom studies of CAL , 1996, Comput. Educ..