Modulating activity in the motor cortex affects performance for the two hands differently depending upon which hemisphere is stimulated

We modulated neural excitability in the human motor cortex to investigate behavioral effects for both hands. In a previous study, we showed that decreasing excitability in the dominant motor cortex led to a decline in performance for the contralateral hand and an improvement for the ipsilateral hand; increasing excitability produced the opposite effects. Research suggests that the ipsilateral effects were mediated by interhemispheric inhibition. Physiological evidence points to an asymmetry in interhemispheric inhibition between the primary motor cortices, with stronger inhibitory projections coming from the dominant motor cortex. In the present study, we examined whether there is a hemispheric asymmetry in the effects on performance when modulating excitability in the motor cortex. Anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation were applied to the motor cortex of 17 participants, targeting the non‐dominant hemisphere on one day and the dominant hemisphere on another day, along with one sham session. Participants performed a finger‐sequence coordination task with each hand before and after stimulation. The dependent variable was calculated as the percentage of change in the number of correct keystrokes. We found that the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation depended upon which hemisphere was stimulated; modulating excitability in the dominant motor cortex significantly affected performance for the contralateral and ipsilateral hands, whereas modulating excitability in the non‐dominant motor cortex only had a significant impact for the contralateral hand. These results provide evidence for a hemispheric asymmetry in the ipsilateral effects of modulating excitability in the motor cortex and may be important for clinical research on motor recovery.

[1]  Y. Kim,et al.  Time-dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the enhancement of working memory , 2008, Neuroreport.

[2]  Nava Levit-Binnun,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in a Finger-tapping Task Separates Motor from Timing Mechanisms and Induces Frequency Doubling , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Julie Duque,et al.  Intermanual Differences in Movement-related Interhemispheric Inhibition , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Imaging correlates of motor recovery from cerebral infarction and their physiological significance in well-recovered patients , 2007, NeuroImage.

[5]  H. Lanfermann,et al.  Determining the topography of interhemispheric fibres in the human corpus callosum (CC) between the primary motor cortices with a combined fMRI/DTI-fibretracking prodecure , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  John Rothwell,et al.  Does brain stimulation after stroke have a future? , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[7]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  L. Cohen,et al.  Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.

[9]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Testing for causality with transcranial direct current stimulation: pitch memory and the left supramarginal gyrus , 2006, Neuroreport.

[10]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Neuroreport.

[11]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Extensive training of elementary finger tapping movements changes the pattern of motor cortex excitability , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Ichiro Watanabe,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Contralesional Primary Motor Cortex Improves Hand Function After Stroke , 2005, Stroke.

[14]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neuroreport.

[15]  Francesca Morgante,et al.  Effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on interhemispheric inhibition. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Off-Line Learning and the Primary Motor Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neurology.

[18]  S. Sato,et al.  Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals , 2005, Neurology.

[19]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Standardizing and validating transcranial magnetic stimulation measures for use in stroke rehabilitation research , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  L. Cohen,et al.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Facilitation of probabilistic classification learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the human , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts tactile perception , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  Gary Kamen,et al.  Hemispheric differences in the relationship between corticomotor excitability changes following a fine-motor task and motor learning. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence for Homeostatic Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[26]  Masako Okamoto,et al.  Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10–20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping , 2004, NeuroImage.

[27]  U. Ziemann,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry of transcallosalinhibition in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Uwe Herwig,et al.  Using the International 10-20 EEG System for Positioning of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2004, Brain Topography.

[29]  U. Ziemann,et al.  Slowing fastest finger movements of the dominant hand with low-frequency rTMS of the hand area of the primary motor cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Ipsilateral motor cortex activation on functional magnetic resonance imaging during unilateral hand movements is related to interhemispheric interactions , 2003, NeuroImage.

[31]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological Modulation of Cortical Excitability Shifts Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Humans , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  J. Liepert,et al.  Interhemispheric effects of high and low frequency rTMS in healthy humans , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Effects on the right motor hand‐area excitability produced by low‐frequency rTMS over human contralateral homologous cortex , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Facilitation of Implicit Motor Learning by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex in the Human , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Intermanual Transfer in a Simple Motor Task , 2002, Cortex.

[36]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[38]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Mirror Movements Complicate Interpretation of Cerebral Activation Changes during Recovery from Subcortical Infarction , 2000, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[40]  M. Hallett,et al.  Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  M. George,et al.  Crossed reduction of human motor cortex excitability by 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation 1 These data were previously published in abstract form in: Wassermann, E.M., Wedegaertner, F.R., George, M.S. and Chen, R., Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 103 (1997) 151. 1 , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[42]  U. Ziemann,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry of transcallosal inhibition in man. , 1995, Experimental brain research.

[43]  B. Day,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[44]  U. Halsband,et al.  LEFT HEMISPHERE PREPONDERANCE IN TRAJECTORIAL LEARNING , 1992, Neuroreport.

[45]  R. Homan,et al.  Cerebral location of international 10-20 system electrode placement. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[46]  M. Coltheart Hemispheric asymmetry , 1978, Nature.

[47]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.