Modeling state-transition dynamics in brain signals by memoryless Gaussian mixtures

Recent studies have proposed that one can summarize brain activity into dynamics among a relatively small number of hidden states and that such an approach is a promising tool for revealing brain function. Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are a prevalent approach to inferring such neural dynamics among discrete brain states. However, the validity of modeling neural time series data with HMMs has not been established. Here, to address this situation and examine the performance of the HMM, we compare the model with the Gaussian mixture model (GMM), which is a statistically simpler model than the HMM with no assumption of Markovianity, by applying both models to synthetic and empirical resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. We find that the GMM allows us to interpret the sequence of the estimated hidden states as a time series obeying some patterns and is often better than HMMs in terms of the accuracy and consistency of estimating the time course of the hidden state. These results suggest that GMMs can be a model of first choice for investigating hidden-state dynamics in data even if the time series is apparently not memoryless.

[1]  B. Lindsay Mixture models : theory, geometry, and applications , 1995 .

[2]  G. Tononi,et al.  Rethinking segregation and integration: contributions of whole-brain modelling , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Energy landscape and dynamics of brain activity during human bistable perception , 2014, Nature Communications.

[4]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Brain network dynamics are hierarchically organized in time , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Naoki Masuda,et al.  Energy landscapes of resting-state brain networks , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[6]  V. Calhoun,et al.  The Chronnectome: Time-Varying Connectivity Networks as the Next Frontier in fMRI Data Discovery , 2014, Neuron.

[7]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  On The Effects of Sampling Rate and Interpolation in HMM-Based Dynamic Signature Verification , 2007, Ninth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR 2007).

[8]  L. Cocchi,et al.  Brain network dynamics in schizophrenia: Reduced dynamism of the default mode network , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[10]  Stephen J. Roberts,et al.  Ensemble Hidden Markov Models with Extended Observation Densities for Biosignal Analysis , 2005 .

[11]  Kaustubh Supekar,et al.  Temporal Dynamics and Developmental Maturation of Salience, Default and Central-Executive Network Interactions Revealed by Variational Bayes Hidden Markov Modeling , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  Jalil Taghia,et al.  Uncovering hidden brain state dynamics that regulate performance and decision-making during cognition , 2018, Nature Communications.

[13]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Discovering dynamic brain networks from big data in rest and task , 2017, NeuroImage.

[14]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Group-PCA for very large fMRI datasets , 2014, NeuroImage.

[15]  John E. Scofield,et al.  Latent resting-state network dynamics in boys and girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder , 2019, PloS one.

[16]  Neri Merhav,et al.  Hidden Markov processes , 2002, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[18]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Altered temporal stability in dynamic neural networks underlies connectivity changes in neurodevelopment , 2018, NeuroImage.

[19]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  MSM: A new flexible framework for Multimodal Surface Matching , 2014, NeuroImage.

[20]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[21]  G Deco,et al.  Discovery of key whole-brain transitions and dynamics during human wakefulness and non-REM sleep , 2019, Nature Communications.

[22]  Naoki Masuda,et al.  Energy landscape analysis of neuroimaging data , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  Diego Vidaurre,et al.  Spontaneous cortical activity transiently organises into frequency specific phase-coupling networks , 2017, bioRxiv.

[24]  G. Rees,et al.  Brain network dynamics in high-functioning individuals with autism , 2017, Nature Communications.

[25]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Andrew J. Viterbi,et al.  Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[27]  Jennifer Pohle,et al.  Selecting the Number of States in Hidden Markov Models: Pragmatic Solutions Illustrated Using Animal Movement , 2017 .

[28]  Ludovica Griffanti,et al.  Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: Combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers , 2014, NeuroImage.

[29]  L. Baum,et al.  A Maximization Technique Occurring in the Statistical Analysis of Probabilistic Functions of Markov Chains , 1970 .

[30]  M. Schölvinck,et al.  Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  G. Edelman,et al.  Complexity and coherency: integrating information in the brain , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[33]  Michiko Sakaki,et al.  Age‐related changes in the ease of dynamical transitions in human brain activity , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[34]  N V Hartvig,et al.  Spatial mixture modeling of fMRI data , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[35]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Multisubject Independent Component Analysis of fMRI: A Decade of Intrinsic Networks, Default Mode, and Neurodiagnostic Discovery , 2012, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Towards a consensus regarding global signal regression for resting state functional connectivity MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[37]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[38]  S. Bressler,et al.  Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  Marina Vannucci,et al.  A Bayesian Approach for Estimating Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity in fMRI Data , 2018, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[40]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Spectrally resolved fast transient brain states in electrophysiological data , 2016, NeuroImage.

[41]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast transient networks in spontaneous human brain activity , 2014, eLife.

[43]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Gilles Celeux,et al.  Selecting hidden Markov model state number with cross-validated likelihood , 2008, Comput. Stat..

[45]  A. Lassl,et al.  Automatic selection of ROIs in functional imaging using Gaussian mixture models , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[46]  B. Everitt,et al.  Mixture model mapping of brain activation in functional magnetic resonance images , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[47]  Jalil Taghia,et al.  Bayesian switching factor analysis for estimating time-varying functional connectivity in fMRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[48]  Steen Moeller,et al.  The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective , 2012, NeuroImage.

[49]  Steen Moeller,et al.  ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[50]  V. Menon Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .