Assessing the assessments: evaluation of four impact assessment protocols for invasive alien species

Aim Effective policy and management responses to the multiple threats posed by invasive alien species (IAS) rely on the ability to assess their impacts before conclusive empirical evidence is available. A plethora of different IAS risk and/or impact assessment protocols have been proposed, but it remains unclear whether, how and why the outcomes of such assessment protocols may differ. Location Europe. Methods Here, we present an in-depth evaluation and informed assessment of the consistency of four prominent protocols for assessing IAS impacts (EICAT, GISS, Harmonia+ and NNRA), using two non-native parrots in Europe: the widespread ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri) and the rapidly spreading monk parakeet (Myiopsitta monachus). Results Our findings show that the procedures used to assess impacts may influence assessment outcomes. We find that robust IAS prioritization can be obtained by assessing species based on their most severe documented impacts, as all protocols yield consistent outcomes across impact categories. Additive impact scoring offers complementary, more subtle information that may be especially relevant for guiding management decisions regarding already established invasive alien species. Such management decisions will also strongly benefit from consensus approaches that reduce disagreement between experts, fostering the uptake of scientific advice into policy-making decisions. Main conclusions Invasive alien species assessments should take advantage of the capacity of consensus assessments to consolidate discussion and agreement between experts. Our results suggest that decision-makers could use the assessment protocol most fit for their purpose, on the condition they apply a precautionary approach by considering the most severe impacts only. We also recommend that screening for high-impact IAS should be performed on a more robust basis than current ad hoc practices, at least using the easiest assessment protocols and reporting confidence scores.

[1]  Helen E. Roy,et al.  Generic ecological impact assessments of alien species in Norway: a semi-quantitative set of criteria , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[2]  W. Rabitsch,et al.  Making the EU Legislation on Invasive Species a Conservation Success , 2017 .

[3]  E. Mori,et al.  Worldwide impact of alien parrots (Aves Psittaciformes) on native biodiversity and environment: a review , 2014 .

[4]  Diederik Strubbe,et al.  Concerns regarding the scientific evidence informing impact risk assessment and management recommendations for invasive birds , 2011 .

[5]  Erik Lebret,et al.  The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure , 2010, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[6]  Melodie A. McGeoch,et al.  Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasion , 2015, Biological Invasions.

[7]  S. Kumschick,et al.  Some alien birds have as severe an impact as the most effectual alien mammals in Europe. , 2010 .

[8]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  The generic impact scoring system (GISS): a standardized tool to quantify the impacts of alien species , 2016, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[9]  Franz Essl,et al.  Review of risk assessment systems of IAS in Europe and introducing the German-Austrian Black List Information System (GABLIS). , 2011 .

[10]  Helen E. Roy,et al.  Invasive alien species – framework for the identification of invasive alien species of EU concern , 2014 .

[11]  V. Smith,et al.  Macroparasites of introduced parakeets in Italy: a possible role for parasite-mediated competition , 2015, Parasitology Research.

[12]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Policy advice: Use experts wisely , 2015, Nature.

[13]  Daniel Sol,et al.  TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: a framework for best practices. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[14]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  Invasive alien species - prioritising prevention efforts through horizon scanning , 2015 .

[15]  W. Revelle.  psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research , 2017 .

[16]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[17]  O. Gordo,et al.  An evaluation of monk parakeet damage to crops in the metropolitan area of Barcelona , 2016 .

[18]  Janet M. Carey,et al.  Linguistic Uncertainty in Qualitative Risk Analysis and How to Minimize It , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  W. Nentwig,et al.  Environmental and economic impact assessment of alien and invasive fish species in Europe using the generic impact scoring system , 2015 .

[20]  M. Vilà.  Handbook of Alien Species in Europe , 2009 .

[21]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  A Unified Classification of Alien Species Based on the Magnitude of their Environmental Impacts , 2014, PLoS biology.

[22]  R. Leuven,et al.  Risk classifications of aquatic non-native species: Application of contemporary European assessment protocols in different biogeographical settings , 2012 .

[23]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  A Generic Impact‐Scoring System Applied to Alien Mammals in Europe , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[24]  Hanno Sandvik,et al.  Generic ecological impact assessment of alien species (GEIAA): the third generation of assessments in Norway , 2019, Biological Invasions.

[25]  J. Dick,et al.  Alien aquatics in Europe: assessing the relative environmental and socio-economic impacts of invasive aquatic macroinvertebrates and other taxa. , 2015 .

[26]  Els Ducheyne,et al.  Harmonia+ and Pandora+: risk screening tools for potentially invasive plants, animals and their pathogens , 2015, Biological Invasions.

[27]  S. Kumschick,et al.  Weak or strong invaders? A comparison of impact between the native and invaded ranges of mammals and birds alien to Europe , 2011 .

[28]  W. Nentwig,et al.  Environmental and economic impact of alien terrestrial arthropods in Europe , 2014 .

[29]  P. Clergeau,et al.  Rose-ringed parakeet Psittacula krameri populations and numbers in Europe: a complete overview , 2016 .

[30]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Invasive Alien Species , 2007 .

[31]  R. Ferris,et al.  The UK risk assessment scheme for all non-native species , 2008 .

[32]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[33]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  Framework and guidelines for implementing the proposed IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) , 2015 .

[34]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[35]  Gritta Schrader,et al.  Consistency in pest risk analysis - how can it be achieved and what are the benefits?* , 2012 .

[36]  S. L. Sporer,et al.  How you ask is what you get: On the influence of question form on accuracy and confidence , 2004 .

[37]  Skariyachan Sinosh,et al.  合成アゾ染料とそれにより汚染されたインドKarnatakaの繊維工業廃水に対するPleurotus ostreatus(Jacq.:Fr.)P.Kumm.子実体の分解能の環境アセスメント , 2016 .

[38]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgment , 2011 .

[39]  M. G. Morgan.  Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Jaakko Heikkilä,et al.  A review of risk prioritisation schemes of pathogens, pests and weeds: principles and practices , 2008 .

[41]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[42]  Johnson Holt.  Score averaging for alien species risk assessment: a probabilistic alternative. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[43]  Marnie L. Campbell,et al.  A review of international, regional and national biosecurity risk assessment frameworks , 2011 .

[44]  Jan Pergl,et al.  Bias and error in understanding plant invasion impacts. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  G. van der Velde,et al.  Evaluation of international risk assessment protocols for exotic species , 2010 .

[46]  T. Blackburn,et al.  Application of the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) to a global assessment of alien bird impacts , 2016 .

[47]  M. Vilà,et al.  Comparing impacts of alien plants and animals in Europe using a standard scoring system , 2015 .