A Unified Estimation Framework for State-Related Changes in Effective Brain Connectivity

Objective: This paper addresses the critical problem of estimating time-evolving effective brain connectivity. Current approaches based on sliding window analysis or time-varying coefficient models do not simultaneously capture both slow and abrupt changes in causal interactions between different brain regions. Methods: To overcome these limitations, we develop a unified framework based on a switching vector autoregressive (SVAR) model. Here, the dynamic connectivity regimes are uniquely characterized by distinct vector autoregressive (VAR) processes and allowed to switch between quasi-stationary brain states. The state evolution and the associated directed dependencies are defined by a Markov process and the SVAR parameters. We develop a three-stage estimation algorithm for the SVAR model: 1) feature extraction using time-varying VAR (TV-VAR) coefficients, 2) preliminary regime identification via clustering of the TV-VAR coefficients, 3) refined regime segmentation by Kalman smoothing and parameter estimation via expectation-maximization algorithm under a state-space formulation, using initial estimates from the previous two stages. Results: The proposed framework is adaptive to state-related changes and gives reliable estimates of effective connectivity. Simulation results show that our method provides accurate regime change-point detection and connectivity estimates. In real applications to brain signals, the approach was able to capture directed connectivity state changes in functional magnetic resonance imaging data linked with changes in stimulus conditions, and in epileptic electroencephalograms, differentiating ictal from nonictal periods. Conclusion: The proposed framework accurately identifies state-dependent changes in brain network and provides estimates of connectivity strength and directionality. Significance: The proposed approach is useful in neuroscience studies that investigate the dynamics of underlying brain states.

[1]  Lester Melie-García,et al.  Estimating brain functional connectivity with sparse multivariate autoregression , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Chee-Ming Ting,et al.  Estimating Effective Connectivity from fMRI Data Using Factor-based Subspace Autoregressive Models , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[3]  Brian Litt,et al.  Time-frequency spectral estimation of multichannel EEG using the Auto-SLEX method , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Aiping Liu,et al.  A Sticky Weighted Regression Model for Time-Varying Resting-State Brain Connectivity Estimation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Switching Kalman Filters , 1998 .

[6]  Karl J. Friston.  Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..

[7]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  A new Kalman filter approach for the estimation of high-dimensional time-variant multivariate AR models and its application in analysis of laser-evoked brain potentials , 2010, NeuroImage.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multivariate Autoregressive Modelling of fMRI time series , 2003 .

[9]  K. Lehnertz,et al.  State dependent properties of epileptic brain networks: Comparative graph–theoretical analyses of simultaneously recorded EEG and MEG , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Piotr J. Franaszczuk,et al.  Ictal propagation of high frequency activity is recapitulated in interictal recordings: Effective connectivity of epileptogenic networks recorded with intracranial EEG , 2014, NeuroImage.

[11]  Bin He,et al.  Electrophysiological Imaging of Brain Activity and Connectivity—Challenges and Opportunities , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  A critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: A simulation study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[13]  Guorong Wu,et al.  A blind deconvolution approach to recover effective connectivity brain networks from resting state fMRI data , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[14]  C. Braun,et al.  Adaptive AR modeling of nonstationary time series by means of Kalman filtering , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Steven C. Cramer,et al.  Hierarchical vector auto-regressive models and their applications to multi-subject effective connectivity , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[16]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic Granger causality based on Kalman filter for evaluation of functional network connectivity in fMRI data , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  J. Raz,et al.  Automatic Statistical Analysis of Bivariate Nonstationary Time Series , 2001 .

[18]  Mahyar Hamedi,et al.  Estimating dynamic cortical connectivity from motor imagery EEG using KALMAN smoother & EM algorithm , 2014, 2014 IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing (SSP).

[19]  Steven C. Cramer,et al.  Resting-state cortical connectivity predicts motor skill acquisition , 2014, NeuroImage.

[20]  J. Régis,et al.  Enhanced EEG functional connectivity in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy , 2008, Epilepsy Research.

[21]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Connectome : A MATLAB toolbox for mapping and imaging of brain , 2010 .

[22]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Parameter estimation for linear dynamical systems , 1996 .

[23]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Tracking the Time-Varying Cortical Connectivity Patterns by Adaptive Multivariate Estimators , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  H. Ombao,et al.  SLEX Analysis of Multivariate Nonstationary Time Series , 2005 .

[25]  Hernando Ombao,et al.  Advanced Topics for Modeling Electroencephalograms , 2016 .

[26]  Kewei Chen,et al.  Identification and validation of effective connectivity networks in functional magnetic resonance imaging using switching linear dynamic systems , 2010, NeuroImage.

[27]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Assessing and Compensating for Zero-Lag Correlation Effects in Time-Lagged Granger Causality Analysis of fMRI , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[29]  Helmut Ltkepohl,et al.  New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis , 2007 .

[30]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis , 1990 .

[31]  Daniele Marinazzo,et al.  Synergy and redundancy in the Granger causal analysis of dynamical networks , 2014, New Journal of Physics.

[32]  Giulio Tononi,et al.  Estimation of Cortical Connectivity From EEG Using State-Space Models , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  Chee-Ming Ting,et al.  Is First-Order Vector Autoregressive Model Optimal for fMRI Data? , 2015, Neural Computation.

[34]  Catie Chang,et al.  Time–frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[35]  T. Caliński,et al.  A dendrite method for cluster analysis , 1974 .

[36]  Hernando Ombao,et al.  Investigating brain connectivity using mixed effects vector autoregressive models , 2012, NeuroImage.

[37]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Evaluating dynamic bivariate correlations in resting-state fMRI: A comparison study and a new approach , 2014, NeuroImage.

[38]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Dynamic connectivity regression: Determining state-related changes in brain connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[39]  Baxter P. Rogers,et al.  Evolution of Functional Connectivity of Brain Networks and Their Dynamic Interaction in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy , 2015, Brain Connect..

[40]  Ali S. Hadi,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Chster Analysis , 1991 .

[41]  Boualem Boashash,et al.  Measuring Time-Varying Information Flow in Scalp EEG Signals: Orthogonalized Partial Directed Coherence , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  R. Shumway,et al.  AN APPROACH TO TIME SERIES SMOOTHING AND FORECASTING USING THE EM ALGORITHM , 1982 .

[43]  Hernando Ombao,et al.  Evolutionary Coherence of Nonstationary Signals , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[44]  Zening Fu,et al.  Adaptive Covariance Estimation of Non-Stationary Processes and its Application to Infer Dynamic Connectivity From fMRI , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[45]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  Christoforos Anagnostopoulos,et al.  Estimating time-varying brain connectivity networks from functional MRI time series , 2013, NeuroImage.

[47]  Aaron Kucyi,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity of the default mode network tracks daydreaming , 2014, NeuroImage.

[48]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Principal components of functional connectivity: A new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest , 2013, NeuroImage.

[49]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast transient networks in spontaneous human brain activity , 2014, eLife.