Improving the Organization, Management, and Outcomes of Substance Abuse Treatment Programs

Objective: This study presents an organizing framework for empirical analyses of substance abuse treatment program effectiveness, based on relevant theories of organization and public management and the body of substance abuse treatment studies, and is applied in analyses of treatment program data. Method: We use descriptive analyses of data from the National Treatment Improvement Evaluation Study that were collected from 519 substance abuse treatment service delivery units and 6593 patients to identify instruments of policy and management that might either frustrate or facilitate the implementation of “best practices” in substance abuse treatment. Results: The analyses show statistically significant and substantively interesting relationships among measures of organizational structure and mission, financial management (e.g., revenues per patient and revenue sources), human resources management (e.g., staffing levels, the use of case managers, etc.), and measures of service technology (e.g., the provision of supportive services, counseling intensity, etc.). Conclusion: Researchers should strive to measure and account for the significant interactions among structural, management, and service technology variables in substance abuse treatment programs and the impact of these variables, mediated through patient characteristics and pre-treatment histories, on treatment outcomes.

[1]  B. McCrady,et al.  Curative factors in alcohol and drug treatment: behavioral and disease model perspectives. , 1992, British journal of addiction.

[2]  P. Attewell,et al.  Government Policy and Local Practice , 1979 .

[3]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[4]  P. Friedmann,et al.  Organizational correlates of access to primary care and mental health services in drug abuse treatment units. , 1999, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[5]  S. Magura Variations in methadone treatment practices. , 1992, JAMA.

[6]  J. N. Baldwin,et al.  Treating Drug Problems, Volume 1: A Study of the Evolution, Effectiveness, and Financing of Public and Private Drug Treatment Systems , 1991 .

[7]  D. Metzger,et al.  The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index. , 1992, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[8]  T. Vaughn,et al.  Variations in methadone treatment practices. Results from a national study. , 1992, JAMA.

[9]  B. Ellis,et al.  THE NATIONAL TREATMENT IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION STUDY : MULTILEVEL REANALYSIS OF TREATMENT OUTCOMES ~ , 2002 .

[10]  H. Rainey,et al.  Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations , 1999 .

[11]  R. Hubbard,et al.  Overview of 1-year follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). , 1997 .

[12]  D. Gerstein,et al.  Services Research Outcomes Study: Overview of Drug Treatment Population and Outcomes , 2000, Substance use & misuse.

[13]  J. Wheeler,et al.  Private and Public Ownership in Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment: Do We Have a Two-Tiered System? , 2004, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[14]  Gerstein Dr,et al.  Treating drug problems. Volume 1: a study of the evolution, effectiveness and financing of public and private drug treatment options , 1990 .

[15]  D P MacKinnon,et al.  Multilevel Mediation Modeling in Group-Based Intervention Studies , 1999, Evaluation review.

[16]  James L. Perry,et al.  Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research , 2001 .

[17]  Matilde P. Machado,et al.  Dollars and performance: treating alcohol misuse in Maine. , 2001, Journal of health economics.

[18]  T. Borkman,et al.  Measuring treatment philosophy: a scale for substance abuse recovery programs. , 1998, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[19]  P. Barnett,et al.  Two Separate Tracks? A National Multivariate Analysis of Differences Between Public and Private Substance Abuse Treatment Programs , 2000, The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse.

[20]  R. Hubbard,et al.  Conceptualizing and Assessing Treatment Structure and Process in Community-Based Drug Dependency Treatment Programs , 2000, Substance use & misuse.

[21]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: a study of drug abuse treatment units. , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[22]  K. Broome,et al.  Patient and program attributes related to treatment process indicators in DATOS. , 1999, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[23]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[24]  R. Hubbard,et al.  The relationship of counseling and self-help participation to patient outcomes in DATOS. , 1999, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[25]  Laurence E. Lynn,et al.  Means and Ends: A Comparative Study of Empirical Methods For Investigating Governance and Performance , 2001 .