High-resolution mapping of sources contributing to urban air pollution using adjoint sensitivity analysis: benzene and diesel black carbon.

The adjoint of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model at 1 km horizontal resolution is used to map emissions that contribute to ambient concentrations of benzene and diesel black carbon (BC) in the San Francisco Bay area. Model responses of interest include population-weighted average concentrations for three highly polluted receptor areas and the entire air basin. We consider both summer (July) and winter (December) conditions. We introduce a novel approach to evaluate adjoint sensitivity calculations that complements existing methods. Adjoint sensitivities to emissions are found to be accurate to within a few percent, except at some locations associated with large sensitivities to emissions. Sensitivity of model responses to emissions is larger in winter, reflecting weaker atmospheric transport and mixing. The contribution of sources located within each receptor area to the same receptor's air pollution burden increases from 38-74% in summer to 56-85% in winter. The contribution of local sources is higher for diesel BC (62-85%) than for benzene (38-71%), reflecting the difference in these pollutants' atmospheric lifetimes. Morning (6-9am) and afternoon (4-7 pm) commuting-related emissions dominate region-wide benzene levels in winter (14 and 25% of the total response, respectively). In contrast, afternoon rush hour emissions do not contribute significantly in summer. Similar morning and afternoon peaks in sensitivity to emissions are observed for the BC response; these peaks are shifted toward midday because most diesel truck traffic occurs during off-peak hours.

[1]  Spyros N. Pandis,et al.  Impact of grid resolution on the predicted fine PM by a regional 3-D chemical transport model , 2013 .

[2]  M. Bocquet,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for mercury over Europe , 2006 .

[3]  Robert A Harley,et al.  Adjoint sensitivity analysis for a three-dimensional photochemical model: implementation and method comparison. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  S. Napelenok,et al.  Air Quality Response Modeling for Decision Support , 2011 .

[5]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Inverse modeling and mapping US air quality influences of inorganic PM 2.5 precursor emissions using the adjoint of GEOS-Chem , 2008 .

[6]  Adrian Sandu,et al.  Adjoint sensitivity analysis of regional air quality models , 2005 .

[7]  R. Morello-Frosch,et al.  Separate and Unequal: Residential Segregation and Estimated Cancer Risks Associated with Ambient Air Toxics in U.S. Metropolitan Areas , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  J. Bao,et al.  Observed and WRF-Simulated Low-Level Winds in a High-Ozone Episode during the Central California Ozone Study , 2008 .

[9]  Adrian Sandu,et al.  The adjoint of CMAQ. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Laurent Menut,et al.  Adjoint modeling for atmospheric pollution process sensitivity at regional scale , 2003 .

[11]  A. Hakami,et al.  Attainment vs exposure: ozone metric responses to source-specific NOx controls using adjoint sensitivity analysis. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Ian A. Waitz,et al.  Spatial sensitivities of human health risk to intercontinental and high-altitude pollution , 2013 .

[13]  Elliot Martin,et al.  High‐resolution mapping of motor vehicle carbon dioxide emissions , 2014 .

[14]  Steven R.H. Barrett,et al.  Air pollution and early deaths in the United States. Part II: Attribution of PM2.5 exposure to emissions species, time, location and sector , 2014 .

[15]  Robert A Harley,et al.  Adjoint sensitivity analysis for a three-dimensional photochemical model: application to Southern California. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  A. Hakami,et al.  Source Attribution of Health Benefits from Air Pollution Abatement in Canada and the United States: An Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[17]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Analysis of transpacific transport of black carbon during HIPPO-3: implications for black carbon aging , 2014 .

[18]  Daven K. Henze,et al.  Intercontinental source attribution of ozone pollution at western U.S. sites using an adjoint method , 2009 .

[19]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Development of the adjoint of GEOS-Chem , 2006 .

[20]  Emil M. Constantinescu,et al.  An adjoint sensitivity analysis and 4D-Var data assimilation study of Texas air quality , 2008 .

[21]  Allen H Goldstein,et al.  Long-term trends in California mobile source emissions and ambient concentrations of black carbon and organic aerosol. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  D. Byun,et al.  Review of the Governing Equations, Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System , 2006 .

[23]  Adrian Sandu,et al.  Adjoint sensitivity analysis of ozone nonattainment over the continental United States. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Andrew J. Kean,et al.  Long-term changes in emissions of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter from on-road gasoline and diesel vehicles , 2008 .

[25]  K. Bowman,et al.  Impacts of transported background pollutants on summertime western US air quality: model evaluation, sensitivity analysis and data assimilation , 2012 .

[26]  Robert Vautard,et al.  Sensitivity of photochemical pollution using the adjoint of a simplified chemistry‐transport model , 2000 .

[27]  Ahmet Palazoglu,et al.  Identification of weather patterns impacting 24-h average fine particulate matter pollution. , 2010 .

[28]  K. Bowman,et al.  Assessment of source contributions to seasonal vegetative exposure to ozone in the U.S. , 2014 .

[29]  P. Percell,et al.  Differences between magnitudes and health impacts of BC emissions across the United States using 12 km scale seasonal source apportionment. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.