The Mechanisms for Autonomous Energy Efficiency Increases: A Cointegration Analysis of the US Energy/GDP Ratio

Many forecasts for energy use and carbon emissions assume that energy intensity will decline over time for reasons unrelated to energy prices, which are termed autonomous energy efficiency increases (AEEI). A cointegration analysis of a vector error correction model indicates that the types of fuels consumed, personal consumption expenditures spent on energy, and energy prices account for changes in the ratio of energy use to economic activity in the US between 1929 and 1999. Cointegration indicates that AEEI is associated with technical and/or structural changes which allow consumers to substitute oil, natural gas, and/or primary electricity for coal, and that shift energy use from final demand to intermediate sectors. Identifying the factors responsible for AEEI allows me to: (1) show that econometric efforts to measure technical change using a deterministic trend are inconsistent with economic theory and cannot be interpreted reliably; (2) show that modeling technical change with a deterministic trend may generate forecasts that overstate reductions in energy use and carbon emissions; and (3) test the observational record for the presence of price-induced technical change and its effect on economic growth. Together, the results indicate that current estimates for AEEI may overstate future reductions in energy use and that the economic impacts of policies to reduce energy use and slow emissions may have a greater effect on economic growth than anticipated currently.

[1]  D. Stern,et al.  Aggregation and the role of energy in the economy , 2000 .

[2]  C. Hall,et al.  Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective , 1984, Science.

[3]  Paul Newbold,et al.  Spurious regressions in econometrics , 2001 .

[4]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  World Carbon Dioxide Emissions: 19502050 , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[5]  C. Granger.  Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[6]  Dermot Gately,et al.  Imperfect Price-Reversibility of U.S. Gasoline Demand: Asymmetric Responses to Price Increases and Declines , 1992 .

[7]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[8]  H. D. Groot,et al.  Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence , 2004 .

[9]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies , 1999 .

[10]  A. Manne,et al.  Buying greenhouse insurance: The economics costs of carbon dioxide emission limits , 1992 .

[11]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Global Energy: Assessing the Future , 1985 .

[12]  C. Shumway,et al.  Technical Change and Model Specification: U.S. Agricultural Production , 1997 .

[13]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Managing The Global Commons , 1994 .

[14]  S. Johansen.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF COINTEGRATION VECTORS , 1988 .

[15]  B. Hannon.  Analysis of the energy cost of economic activities: 1963 to 2000 , 1982 .

[16]  S. Hall,et al.  On the Identification of Cointegrated Systems in Small Samples: Practical Procedures with an Application to UK Wages and Prices , 1999 .

[17]  William W. Hogan,et al.  Productivity Trends and the Cost of Reducing CO2 Emissions , 1991 .

[18]  G. Nicoletti,et al.  GREEN: A GLOBAL MODEL FOR QUANTIFYING THE COSTS OF POLICIES TO CURB CO2 EMISSIONS , 1992 .

[19]  James H. Stock,et al.  Asymptotic Properties of Least Squares Estimators of Cointegrating Vectors , 1987 .

[20]  Michael Osterwald-Lenum.  A Note with Quantiles of the Asymptotic Distribution of the Maximum Likelihood Cointegration Rank Test Statistics , 1992 .

[21]  James G. MacKinnon,et al.  Approximate Asymptotic Distribution Functions for Unit-Root and Cointegration Tests , 1994 .

[22]  D. Stern,et al.  Energy and economic growth , 2004, Routledge Handbook of Energy Economics.

[23]  James G. MacKinnon,et al.  Critical Values for Cointegration Tests , 1990 .

[24]  Asami Miketa,et al.  Energy productivity across developed and developing countries in 10 manufacturing sectors: Patterns of growth and convergence , 2005 .

[25]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Meeting Environmental Objectives? , 1999 .

[26]  Jay Zarnikau,et al.  A Note: Will Tomorrow’s Energy Efficiency Indices Prove Useful in Economic Studies? , 1999 .

[27]  S. Johansen,et al.  MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE ON COINTEGRATION — WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE DEMAND FOR MONEY , 2009 .

[28]  Hadi Dowlatabadi,et al.  A REVIEW OF TECHNICAL CHANGE IN ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE POLICY , 1999 .

[29]  David Popp,et al.  Induced Innovation and Energy Prices , 2001 .

[30]  Robert K. Kaufmann,et al.  The relation between marginal product and price in US energy markets: Implications for climate change policy☆ , 1994 .

[31]  James D. Hamilton.  Oil and the Macroeconomy since World War II , 1983, Journal of Political Economy.

[32]  C. Granger,et al.  Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing , 1987 .

[33]  A. Manne,et al.  Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of CO2 Emission Limits , 1992 .

[34]  Robert K. Kaufmann,et al.  A biophysical analysis of the energy/real GDP ratio: implications for substitution and technical change , 1992 .

[35]  F. Gerard Adams,et al.  On Relative Fuel Efficiency and the Output Elasticity of Energy Consumption in Western Europe , 1968 .

[36]  David I. Stern,et al.  A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy , 2000 .

[37]  W. Fuller,et al.  Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root , 1979 .

[38]  Estimating Duality Models with Biased Technical Change: A Time Series Approach , 1992 .