Damage Behavior of Foam Core Sandwich Composites Subjected to Quasi-Static Indentation Testing

Damage behavior of foam core sandwich composites subjected to quasi-static indentation testing was investigated detailedly. Force-displacement curves and the cross-sections of damaged sandwich panels were analyzed. Effects of core thickness, face-sheet thickness and toughness of face-sheet materials were discussed by comparison with different specimens subjected to quasi-static indentation testing. Results showed that damage behavior of sandwich composites had identical feature. Collapse of foam core initially appeared, and then foam core generated crack. Delamination and fiber breakage of upper face-sheet occurred. Finally, the foam core and the face-sheet were disengaged. For the specimens with thick foam cores, the foam crack extended in longitudinal direction was caused. However, for the specimens with thin foam cores, the foam cracked in transverse direction. After face-sheets were toughened with PAEK, the damage resistance and the maximum force of the sandwich panels increased. Also, the shear angle of foam crack changed to be lager. Compared with the penetrated damage behavior of sandwich panels with thin face-sheets, the upper face-sheets of the former the specimens with thick face-sheets bulged partially and could not be penetrated.

[1]  X.-S. Yi,et al.  Effect of interleaf sequence on impact damage and residual strength in a graphite/epoxy laminate , 2004 .

[2]  Michelle S. Hoo Fatt,et al.  Dynamic models for low-velocity impact damage of composite sandwich panels – Part A: Deformation , 2001 .

[3]  L. Xiaogang,et al.  Toughness improvement of PMR-type polyimide and laminated graphite systems by ex-situ concept , 2005 .

[4]  F. M. Shuaeib,et al.  Indentation failure of composite sandwich beams , 1997 .

[5]  Robin Olsson,et al.  Impact on composite structures , 2004, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[6]  Michelle S. Hoo Fatt,et al.  Dynamic models for low-velocity impact damage of composite sandwich panels – Part B: Damage initiation , 2001 .

[7]  Zhang Zilong,et al.  Toughness improvement of carbon laminates by periodic interleaving thin thermoplastic films , 2002 .

[8]  P D Soden,et al.  Indentation of composite sandwich beams , 1996 .

[9]  Stefan Hallström,et al.  Failure Mechanisms and Modelling of Impact Damage in Sandwich Beams - A 2D Approach: Part I - Experimental Investigation , 2003 .

[10]  Robin Olsson,et al.  Engineering Method for Prediction of Impact Response and Damage in Sandwich Panels , 2002 .

[11]  M. Akay,et al.  A comparison of honeycomb-core and foam-core carbon-fibre/epoxy sandwich panels , 1990 .

[12]  Stephen R Reid,et al.  Indentation, Penetration and Perforation of Composite Laminate and Sandwich Panels under Quasi-Static and Projectile Loading , 1997 .

[13]  X. An,et al.  Ex‐situ Formation Periodic Interlayer Structure to Improve Significantly the Impact Damage Resistance of Carbon Laminates , 2003 .