The Institutional Origins of Dynamic Capabilities in Multinational Enterprises

This article argues that a focus on the institutional underpinnings of multinational enterprise (MNE) strategy and behavior is not only consistent with the emerging literature on dynamic capabilities, but it also serves to highlight the unique role played by MNEs in generating new organizational routines by combining locally embedded capabilities with those that are mobile across borders. Firms shape markets rather than the other way around, because of the role organizational innovation plays in redefining the rules of selection in the operating environment. Of such innovations, some proportion will remain proprietary, while others become diffused more widely in the industry, as the choices made by pioneering firms are imitated by others. We argue that the combination of increasing interconnections between geographically dispersed markets and the greater use of market-based transactions have intensified the incentives for MNEs to engage in the development of new routines, and to formalize them into transferable practices. This is likely to increase the overall transparency of the origins of firm capabilities, leading potentially to more specialization and less internalization at the industry level. Copyright 2010 The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

[1]  M. Casson,et al.  The future of the multinational enterprise , 1977 .

[2]  Peter S. Davis,et al.  Mode of International Entry: An Isomorphism Perspective , 2000 .

[3]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  Edith Penrose and a learning-based perspective on the MNE and OLI , 2007 .

[4]  George Strauss,et al.  Tracking the Giant Corporation@@@Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. , 1991 .

[5]  Scott Moss,et al.  Industry recipes: The nature and sources of managerial judgement: J.-C. Spender (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1989) pp. 240 , 1992 .

[6]  R. Sugden,et al.  The Nature of the Transnational Firm (2nd ed.) , 2000 .

[7]  J. Dunning.  Reappraising the Eclectic Paradigm in an Age of Alliance Capitalism , 1995 .

[8]  David J. Teece,et al.  The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Perspectives on Alfred Chandler's Scale and Scope , 1993 .

[9]  A. Rugman,et al.  A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises , 2004 .

[10]  Douglass C. North,et al.  Understanding the Process of Economic Change , 1999 .

[11]  M. Zollo,et al.  Interest alignment and competitive advantage , 2007 .

[12]  N. Kay.  Dynamic capabilities as context: the role of decision, system and structure , 2010 .

[13]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[14]  R. Nelson.  Evolutionary social science and universal Darwinism , 2006 .

[15]  D. Mcfetridge.  Knowledge, Market Failure and the Multinational Enterprise: A Comment , 1995 .

[16]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Book Review , 2001 .

[17]  C. Oliver.  SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[18]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory , 1996 .

[19]  Oliver E. Williamson,et al.  Examining economic organization through the lens of contract , 2003 .

[20]  R. Nelson.  Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? , 1991 .

[21]  John Cantwell,et al.  Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[22]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view , 2007 .

[23]  J. Barney.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes , 2001 .

[24]  J. Hennart.  Free-Standing Firms and the Internalisation of Markets for Financial Capital: A Response to Casson , 1994 .

[25]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities , 2001 .

[26]  J. Dunning.  Towards a New Paradigm of Development: Implications for the Determinants of International Business Activity , 2010 .

[27]  Sarianna M. Lundan,et al.  The Internationalization of Corporate R&D: A Review of the Evidence and Some Policy Implications for Home Countries , 2008 .

[28]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Bringing institutions into evolutionary growth theory , 2002 .

[29]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions , 2002 .

[30]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[31]  J. Hennart,et al.  Transaction costs theory and the multinational enterprise , 2005 .

[32]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? , 2001 .

[33]  Peer Hull Kristensen,et al.  The contested space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism , 2006 .

[34]  Albert O. Hirschman,et al.  Exit, Voice, and Loyalty , 1970 .

[35]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  A Behavioral Resource-Based View of the Firm: The Synergy of Cyert and March (1963) and Penrose (1959) , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[36]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[37]  Li Li,et al.  Managing Knowledge Transfer in Mncs: The Impact of Headquarters Control Mechanisms , 2004 .

[38]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose , 2003 .

[39]  John Cantwell,et al.  Innovation and Information Technology in the MNE , 2009 .

[40]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  A memoir and reflection: knowledge and an evolutionary theory of the multinational firm 10 years later , 2003 .

[41]  Richard Florida,et al.  Technology and Tolerance , 2005 .

[42]  A. Madhok.  Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm and the institutional structure of production , 2002 .

[43]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[44]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  The resource‐based view of the firm: Ten years after , 1995 .

[45]  Liisa Välikangas,et al.  The quest for resilience. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[46]  David J. Teece,et al.  Reflections on the Hymer thesis and the multinational enterprise , 2006 .

[47]  M. Jacobides,et al.  Benefiting from Innovation: Value Creation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures , 2006 .

[48]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[49]  D. Teece,et al.  Cross-border Market Co-creation, Dynamic Capabilities and the Entrepreneurial Theory of the Multinational Enterprise , 2010 .

[50]  Sarianna M. Lundan,et al.  Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise , 2008 .

[51]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[52]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  Adoption of the Multidivisional Structure: Analyzing History from the Start , 1998 .

[53]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[54]  G. Dosi,et al.  Learning how to govern and learning how to solve problems: on the co-evolution of competences, confl , 1995 .

[55]  Todd Sandler,et al.  The Economic Theory of Clubs: An Evaluative Survey , 1980 .

[56]  Joseph E. Stiglitz,et al.  TOWARDS A NEW PARADIGM FOR DEVELOPMENT , 1998 .

[57]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[58]  Jean‐Franois Hennart.  THE ‘COMPARATIVE INSTITUTIONAL’ THEORY OF THE FIRM: SOME IMPLICATIONS FOR CORPORATE STRATEGY* , 1994 .

[59]  R. Mudambi,et al.  Is Knowledge Power? Knowledge Flows, Subsidiary Power and Rent-Seeking within MNCs , 2004 .

[60]  D. North,et al.  Economic performance through time , 2012 .

[61]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[62]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[63]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[64]  D. Teece,et al.  Strategy as Evolution with Design: The Foundations of Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in the Economic System , 2008 .

[65]  J. Dunning,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Second Edition , 1992 .

[66]  M. Jacobides.  Playing Football in a Soccer Field: Value Chain Structures, Institutional Modularity and Foreign Expansion , 2005 .

[67]  H. Gray.  Extending the Eclectic Paradigm in International Business , 2003 .

[68]  P. Almond,et al.  Institutional theory and the cross-national transfer of employment policy: the case of ‘workforce diversity’ in US multinationals , 2005 .

[69]  A. Rugman,et al.  The end of globalization , 2000 .

[70]  Roger Pooley,et al.  Industry Recipes: The Nature and Sources of Managerial Judgement , 1989 .

[71]  S. Winter,et al.  The Co-evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production , 2005 .

[72]  Alan M. Rugman,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of International Business , 2010 .

[73]  Mike W. Peng.  The resource-based view and international business: , 2001 .

[74]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[75]  Peer Hull Kristensen,et al.  Local Players in Global Games: The Strategic Constitution of a Multinational Corporation , 2004 .

[76]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Dynamic capabilities, deliberate learning and environmental dynamism: a simulation model , 2010 .

[77]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  The Emergence and Impact of MNC Centres of Excellence: A Subsidiary Perspective , 2000 .

[78]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Selective Intervention and Internal Hybrids : Interpreting and Learning from the Rise and Decline of the Oticon Spaghetti Organization , 2001 .

[79]  M. Kipping,et al.  The Americanisation of European business : the Marshall Plan and the transfer of US management models , 1998 .

[80]  D. Teece,et al.  The (New) Nature and Essence of the Firm , 2009 .

[81]  Thomas P. Kenworthy,et al.  Multidivisional vs metanational governance of the multinational enterprise , 2008 .

[82]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[83]  A. Rugman,et al.  Subsidiary‐specific advantages in multinational enterprises , 2001 .

[84]  L. Pil.  The Rise of the Creative Class , 2004 .

[85]  T. Kostova,et al.  Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects , 2002 .

[86]  Mark C. Casson.  Institutional Diversity in Overseas Enterprise: Explaining the Free-Standing Company , 1994 .

[87]  D. Teece,et al.  Organizing for innovation: When is virtual virtuous? , 2002 .

[88]  Heather A. Haveman.  Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .

[89]  John H. Dunning,et al.  The contribution of Edith Penrose to international business scholarship , 2003 .

[90]  K. R. Conner.  A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[91]  R. Langlois.  The Vanishing Hand: The Changing Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism , 2001 .

[92]  J. Cantwell.  A survey of theories of international production , 2005 .

[93]  John Cantwell,et al.  MNE competence‐creating subsidiary mandates , 2005 .

[94]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[95]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[96]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[97]  A. Rugman,et al.  Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise: internalization and strategic management perspectives , 2003 .

[98]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[99]  Mie Augier,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions , 2007 .

[100]  John H. Dunning,et al.  Some antecedents of internalization theory , 2003 .

[101]  G. Hodgson.  Opportunism is not the only reason why firms exist: why an explanatory emphasis on opportunism may mislead management strategy , 2004 .

[102]  José Santos,et al.  From global to metanational: how companies win in the knowledge economy , 2001, UBIQ.

[103]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[104]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[105]  N. Foss.  Knowledge-Based Approaches to the Theory of the Firm: Some Critical Comments , 1996 .

[106]  T. Kostova,et al.  Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions , 2008 .

[107]  R. Nelson,et al.  Making Sense of Institutions as a Factor Shaping Economic Performance (Spanish Version) , 2001 .

[108]  A. Rugman,et al.  Edith Penrose's contribution to the resource-based view of strategic management , 2002 .

[109]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Economic Development from the Perspective of Evolutionary Economic Theory , 2008 .

[110]  J. Dunning,et al.  An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment , 2009 .

[111]  Joan V. Robinson,et al.  The Nature of the Firm , 2004 .

[112]  John H. Dunning,et al.  The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future , 2001 .

[113]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[114]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[115]  J. Hennart.  Theories of the multinational enterprise , 2009 .

[116]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Resources, Firms, and Strategies: A Reader in the Resource-Based Perspective , 1997 .

[117]  S. Chen.  Extending internalization theory: a new perspective on international technology transfer and its generalization , 2005 .

[118]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[119]  Gianmario Verona,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities Deconstructed: A Bibliographic Investigation into the Origins, Development, and Future Directions of the Research Domain , 2010 .

[120]  M. Wilkins,et al.  The Free-Standing Company in the World Economy, 1830-1996 , 2001 .

[121]  R. Grosse.  The Free-Standing Company in the World Economy , 2001 .

[122]  P. Cook,et al.  Explaining international production , 1990 .

[123]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[124]  J. Hennart,et al.  Explaining the swollen middle : Why most transactions are a mix of market and hierarchy , 1993 .