Ethics in Social Networking: A Framework for Evaluating Online Information Disclosure

Participation and membership in social networking sites has exploded in the past several years. Services such as Myspace, Facebook, and LinkedIn have evolved from niche communities to active societies. In addition to an increase in usage rates among certain demographic groups, there has also been an increase in the amount and type of information participants freely reveal. In this paper, we integrate decision making research from marketing, theology and privacy literature to explain information disclosure in online communities. In particular, we use Potter's Box to propose a framework for evaluating the ethical implications of online information disclosure. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

[1]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Friendster and publicly articulated social networking , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[2]  D. Boyd.  Reflections on Friendster, Trust and Intimacy , 2003 .

[3]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Communities of Practice: Fostering Peer-to-Peer Learning and Informal Knowledge Sharing in the Work Place , 2008 .

[4]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Christian Fuchs,et al.  Towards a dynamic theory of virtual communities , 2007, Int. J. Knowl. Learn..

[6]  John M. Silvester,et al.  The Social Life of Information: Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. ISBN 0-87584-762-5. 320 pages , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[7]  D. Fesenmaier,et al.  Defining the virtual tourist community: implications for tourism marketing , 2002 .

[8]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[9]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Information revelation and privacy in online social networks , 2005, WPES '05.

[10]  S. Milgram,et al.  The Individual In A Social World: Essays and Experiments , 1992 .

[11]  Marko Čupić,et al.  Online communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability , 2003 .

[12]  T. Ponzurick,et al.  The Right Choice: A Case Method for Taching Ethics in Marketing , 1992 .

[13]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Trust and Privacy Concern Within Social Networking Sites: A Comparison of Facebook and MySpace , 2007, AMCIS.

[14]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[15]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Relationships Between Open Source Software Companies and Communities: Observations from Nordic Firms , 2005 .

[16]  Hugo Liu.  InterestMap : Harvesting Social Network Profiles for Recommendations , 2004 .

[17]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Because Time Matters: Temporal Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Karin Garrety,et al.  Integrating communities of practice in technology development projects , 2004 .

[19]  Lior Jacob Strahilevitz,et al.  A Social Networks Theory of Privacy , 2004 .

[20]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[21]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[22]  Scott J. Vitell,et al.  Marketing ethics: Conceptual and empirical foundations of a positive theory of decision making in marketing situations having ethical content , 1986 .

[23]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Determinants of success for online communities: an empirical study , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[25]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .

[26]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[27]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[29]  Ying-Feng Kuo,et al.  A study on service quality of virtual community websites , 2003 .

[30]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[31]  FarajSamer,et al.  Why should i share? examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice , 2005 .

[32]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[33]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Social networks and Internet connectivity effects , 2005 .

[34]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[35]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition via Three Learning Processes in Enterprise Information Portals: Learning-by-Investment, Learning-by-Doing, and Learning-from-Others , 2005, MIS Q..