The taste of typefaces in different countries and languages.

People associate tastes and taste words (e.g., “bitter”, “sweet”, etc.) with shape features in predictable ways. In the present study, we evaluate how the curvature and boldness of typeface influences the gustatory taste (i.e., bitter, salty, sour, and sweet) associated with the typefaces of words written in three languages (Spanish, English, and Chinese). The study also included participants from three countries: Colombia, the United Kingdom, and China. Consistent with previous research, rounder typefaces were reliably associated with the word sweet, whereas more angular typefaces were associated with the other tastes in all three languages and countries. These results provide robust support for the notion that shape curvature is differentially matched to tastes, in a manner that is similar, across countries. Moreover, the results also indicate that all of the participants evaluated the angular typefaces in Spanish and English as more bitter, salty, and sour than the round typefaces in Spanish and English, but this angular/rounded effect was not found with Chinese typefaces. Additionally, the rounder typefaces were evaluated as sweeter than the angular typefaces in all languages and countries. Given that the Chinese round and angular characters differed only in terms of the perceived curvature (not liking, familiarity, and clarity), it is not possible to conclude that liking accounts for all the correspondences that we report. Possible mechanisms and directions for future research are discussed.

[1]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Eating with our eyes: From visual hunger to digital satiation , 2016, Brain and Cognition.

[2]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Crossmodal correspondences between taste and shape, and their implications for product packaging: A review , 2016 .

[3]  U. Orth,et al.  Healthy by design, but only when in focus: Communicating non-verbal health cues through symbolic meaning in packaging , 2016 .

[4]  Bianca Grohmann Communicating brand gender through type fonts , 2016 .

[5]  P. Walker Cross-sensory correspondences: A Theoretical framework and their relevance to music , 2016 .

[6]  Marcos Nadal,et al.  Preference for Curvature: A Historical and Conceptual Framework , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Comparing Angular and Curved Shapes in Terms of Implicit Associations and Approach/Avoidance Responses , 2015, PloS one.

[8]  C. Spence,et al.  The sweetest thing: the influence of angularity, symmetry, and the number of elements on shape-valence and shape-taste matches , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[9]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science , 2015, Science.

[10]  Carlos Velasco,et al.  The Taste of Typeface , 2015, i-Perception.

[11]  Carlos Velasco,et al.  Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review , 2015, PeerJ.

[12]  C. Spence On the psychological impact of food colour , 2015, Flavour.

[13]  C. Spence,et al.  Hedonic mediation of the crossmodal correspondence between taste and shape , 2015 .

[14]  Charles Spence,et al.  Sensory expectations based on product-extrinsic food cues: An interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts , 2015 .

[15]  D. Westerman,et al.  The effect of processing fluency on impressions of familiarity and liking. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Jasper J. F. van den Bosch,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in crossmodal correspondences between basic tastes and visual features , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[17]  Elia Gatti,et al.  A taste of Kandinsky: assessing the influence of the artistic visual presentation of food on the dining experience , 2014, Flavour.

[18]  Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos,et al.  Predictive packaging design: Tasting shapes, typefaces, names, and sounds , 2014 .

[19]  C. Spence,et al.  On the shapes of flavours: A review of four hypotheses , 2014 .

[20]  Vanessa Lobue Deconstructing the snake: the relative roles of perception, cognition, and emotion on threat detection. , 2014, Emotion.

[21]  Karin Wendin,et al.  A Comparative Study on Facially Expressed Emotions in Response to Basic Tastes , 2014, Chemosensory Perception.

[22]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  Music–color associations are mediated by emotion , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Ian D. Parkman,et al.  Using type font characteristics to communicate brand personality of new brands , 2013 .

[24]  J. Delwiche,et al.  You eat with your eyes first , 2012, Physiology & Behavior.

[25]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Implicit affective evaluation of visual symmetry. , 2012, Emotion.

[26]  A. Wilkins,et al.  Periodic letter strokes within a word affect fixation disparity during reading. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[27]  J. Henrich,et al.  Most people are not WEIRD , 2010, Nature.

[28]  C. Carbon The cycle of preference: long-term dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[29]  David C. Zhu,et al.  Recognizing Threat: A Simple Geometric Shape Activates Neural Circuitry for Threat Detection , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Doyle,et al.  The massage in the medium: Transfer of connotative meaning from typeface to names and products , 2009 .

[31]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference , 2009 .

[32]  P. Walker,et al.  Font tuning: A review and new experimental evidence , 2008 .

[33]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  If It's Hard to Read, It's Hard to Do , 2008, Psychological science.

[34]  Rachael E. Jack,et al.  Culture Shapes How We Look at Faces , 2008, PloS one.

[35]  S. Juni,et al.  Emotional and Persuasive Perception of Fonts , 2008, Perceptual and motor skills.

[36]  Arnold J Wilkins,et al.  Stripes within Words Affect Reading , 2007, Perception.

[37]  Pinya Silayoi,et al.  The Importance of Packaging Attributes: A Conjoint Analysis Approach , 2007 .

[38]  Søren Højsgaard,et al.  The R Package geepack for Generalized Estimating Equations , 2005 .

[39]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[40]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Impression Management using Typeface Design , 2004 .

[41]  J. Doyle,et al.  Font appropriateness and brand choice , 2004 .

[42]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Comparing the effects of text size and format on the readibility of computer-displayed Times New Roman and Arial text , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[43]  J. Hanley,et al.  Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[44]  J. E. Steiner,et al.  Comparative expression of hedonic impact: affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[45]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  On Perceptual Metaphors , 1996 .

[46]  Geoffrey L. Collier,et al.  Affective synesthesia: Extracting emotion space from simple perceptual stimuli , 1996 .

[47]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Symmetry, beauty and evolution , 1994, Nature.

[48]  B. W. Whittlesea Illusions of familiarity. , 1993 .

[49]  Lester M. Hyman,et al.  Which are the stimuli in facial displays of anger and happiness? Configurational bases of emotion recognition. , 1992 .

[50]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Communicability of the emotional connotation of type , 1986 .

[51]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[52]  B. Lyman Representation of Complex Emotional and Abstract Meanings by Simple Forms , 1979, Perceptual and motor skills.

[53]  I. Child,et al.  Emotional meaning of four typographical variables. , 1968, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  Percy H. Tannenbaum,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Typeface Connotations , 1964 .

[55]  A. T. Poffenberger,et al.  The Feeling Value of Lines. , 1924 .

[56]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  1 RUNNING HEAD : TASTE-SHAPE SEMANTICS 2 3 4 THE SEMANTIC BASIS OF TASTE-SHAPE ASSOCIATIONS 5 , 2018 .

[57]  Franck Celhay,et al.  Food packages and communication through typeface design: The exoticism of exotypes , 2015 .

[58]  Simon Garfield,et al.  Just My Type: A Book About Fonts , 2010 .

[59]  T. V. Leeuwen Towards a semiotics of typography , 2006 .

[60]  John R. Doyle,et al.  Dressed for the Occasion: Font-Product Congruity in the Perception of Logotype , 2006 .

[61]  L. Birch Development of food preferences. , 1999, Annual review of nutrition.

[62]  R. E. Warren,et al.  Interference in a typeface variant of the Stroop test , 1974 .

[63]  A. T. Poffenberger,et al.  A study of the appropriateness of type faces. , 1923 .