Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind

A Good Read Theory of Mind is the human capacity to comprehend that other people hold beliefs and desires and that these may differ from one's own beliefs and desires. The currently predominant view is that literary fiction—often described as narratives that focus on in-depth portrayals of subjects' inner feelings and thoughts—can be linked to theory of mind processes, especially those that are involved in the understanding or simulation of the affective characteristics of the subjects. Kidd and Castano (p. 377, published online 3 October) provide experimental evidence that reading passages of literary fiction, in comparison to nonfiction or popular fiction, does indeed enhance the reader's performance on theory of mind tasks. Experimental evidence suggests that reading good fiction helps us to understand others. Understanding others’ mental states is a crucial skill that enables the complex social relationships that characterize human societies. Yet little research has investigated what fosters this skill, which is known as Theory of Mind (ToM), in adults. We present five experiments showing that reading literary fiction led to better performance on tests of affective ToM (experiments 1 to 5) and cognitive ToM (experiments 4 and 5) compared with reading nonfiction (experiments 1), popular fiction (experiments 2 to 5), or nothing at all (experiments 2 and 5). Specifically, these results show that reading literary fiction temporarily enhances ToM. More broadly, they suggest that ToM may be influenced by engagement with works of art.

[1]  Martijn Veltkamp,et al.  How Does Fiction Reading Influence Empathy? An Experimental Investigation on the Role of Emotional Transportation , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  Predicting workplace outcomes from the ability to eavesdrop on feelings. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Roland Barthes,et al.  S/Z: An Essay , 1970 .

[4]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Keith Oatley,et al.  Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes , 2009 .

[6]  R. Gerrig,et al.  Psychological Processes Underlying Literary Impact , 2004 .

[7]  Jordan B. Peterson,et al.  Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds , 2006 .

[8]  Dean E. Hewes,et al.  The Parasocial Contact Hypothesis , 2005 .

[9]  Simone G. Shamay-Tsoory,et al.  The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in affective theory of mind deficits in criminal offenders with psychopathic tendencies , 2010, Cortex.

[10]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[11]  J. Billington 'Reading for Life': prison reading groups in practice and theory , 2011 .

[12]  Anne Hudson Jones,et al.  Why literature and medicine? , 1996, The Lancet.

[13]  B. R. Buckingham What Should Children Read in School , 1924 .

[14]  T. Chamorro‐Premuzic,et al.  Investigating Theory of Mind deficits in nonclinical psychopathy and Machiavellianism , 2010 .

[15]  J. Bruner Actual minds, possible worlds , 1985 .

[16]  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore,et al.  Neural processing associated with cognitive and affective Theory of Mind in adolescents and adults. , 2012, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[17]  Laura Furman,et al.  The PEN/O. Henry Prize stories , 2009 .

[18]  N. Epley,et al.  In the mood to get over yourself: mood affects theory-of-mind use. , 2008, Emotion.

[19]  T. Brock,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology the Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives Text Quality Individual Differences and Situational Influences Transportation Scale Items Gender Differences Discriminant Validation: Need for Cognition Effect of Text Manipulation Beli , 2022 .

[20]  Daniel J. Acheson,et al.  New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[21]  S. Carey,et al.  Understanding other minds: linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  David S. Miall,et al.  Foregrounding, Defamiliarization, and Affect: Response to Literary Stories , 1994 .

[23]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics , 1985 .

[24]  S. Shamay-Tsoory The Neural Bases for Empathy , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[25]  Craig A. Anderson,et al.  Comfortably Numb , 2009, Psychological science.

[26]  D. Steel The Sins of the Mother , 2012 .

[27]  Louise Erdrich The Round House , 2012 .

[28]  Simone G. Shamay-Tsoory,et al.  Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: A lesion study , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  David S. Miall,et al.  Beyond text theory: Understanding literary response , 1994 .

[30]  Keith Oatley,et al.  The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[31]  Frans B. M. de Waal,et al.  The Antiquity of Empathy , 2012 .

[32]  S. Shamay-Tsoory Recognition of ‘Fortune of Others’ Emotions in Asperger Syndrome and High Functioning Autism , 2008, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[33]  J. Ashby References and Notes , 1999 .

[34]  David S. Miall,et al.  What is literariness? Three components of literary reading , 1999 .

[35]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  K. Oatley,et al.  Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy , 2013 .